Article

2004-08-02 International-UN-NGOs

UN Urged to Protect Muslims Who Change Religion

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by TS(vice girl) 2004-08-02 11:07:00 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 In Britain, it said, not only has there been no reply from the Muslim Council, the main umbrella body, but also "virtually no response" from leaders of major Christian denominations who had been contacted. "It is a tragic day when so few...

Dhimmitude dares not speak its name.

Posted by mhw 2004-08-02 11:51:37 AM|| 2004-08-02 11:51:37 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Religion of Peace and Tolorence.....

Posted by CrazyFool 2004-08-02 11:51:48 AM|| 2004-08-02 11:51:48 AM|| Front Page Top

#3
It's about time somebody did this, and the US Ambassador to the UN should stand up and give a speech on the subject every single day.
.

Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-08-02 12:46:14 PM|| 2004-08-02 12:46:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Campaigners for religious freedom have urged the United Nations to act to protect "Muslims who choose to convert to another faith." A petition signed by almost 90,000 people in 32 countries was presented last week to U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour, the organization spearheading the campaign said Monday.

This has got to be a joke. How is the UN going to protect Muslim converts when, in the absence of U.S. backing, it can't even put any weight behind its own resolutions?

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-08-02 3:02:17 PM|| 2004-08-02 3:02:17 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 I'm with your Bar. The UN cannot even protect a group who seek only to practice their faith undisturbed, namely, the Jews. What f&%king use will the UN be in protecting apostasic Muslims from their terrorist counterparts? The UN can't even squeeze out a resolution properly condemning terrorism without larding it with anti-Semitic language. Who honestly thinks they would be worth sh!t protecting people from the very groups that hijack every general assembly?

Posted by Zenster 2004-08-02 4:00:14 PM|| 2004-08-02 4:00:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 "When thou seeketh protection, seeketh not the threshold of the United Nations." - an annonymous Rwandan

Posted by Super Hose 2004-08-02 5:11:09 PM|| 2004-08-02 5:11:09 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 EUros should support this 100% since they are so anti-death penalty (...chirp, chirp)

Posted by Spot 2004-08-02 9:44:34 PM|| 2004-08-02 9:44:34 PM|| Front Page Top

03:26 FlameBait93268
03:16 Anonymous6006
14:26 john
11:13 BigEd
09:26 .com
00:33 gromky
00:27 Ol_Dirty_American
00:25 Anonymous5977
00:17 Ol_Dirty_American
00:01 Seafarious
00:00 Zenster
23:58 CrazyFool
23:51 Seafarious
23:48 Oldspook
23:46 Frank G
23:46 CrazyFool
23:42 Ol_Dirty_American
23:37 CrazyFool
23:36 Ol_Dirty_American
23:09 GreatestJeneration
23:06 Lucky
22:53 Mike Sylwester
22:49 Mike Sylwester
22:37 Brutus