Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 08/14/2004 View Fri 08/13/2004 View Thu 08/12/2004 View Wed 08/11/2004 View Tue 08/10/2004 View Mon 08/09/2004 View Sun 08/08/2004
1
2004-08-14 Iraq-Jordan
Najaf fighting pauses for negotiations, Powell gets it
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2004-08-14 12:35:21 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 But the mere word of it among his fighters set off a fresh round of fury against the Americans, with vows of suicide bombings and other renewed attacks.

This is why we must kill them all now and end this once and for all.

Trust Sadr to tell the truth? You may as well trust John Kerry to tell the truth too. They both will claim to have a mandate from God to lie....
Posted by CrazyFool  2004-08-14 1:13:26 AM||   2004-08-14 1:13:26 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 This is insane! Letting al Sadr live is to let a known terrorist keep inciting violence and insurrection against the government. If you take him out, sure everyone will go nuts. But are they going to do that forever? Decisive action is needed now. The longer you wait the more legitimate Tater becomes.
Posted by Alaska Paul 2004-08-14 1:38:46 AM||   2004-08-14 1:38:46 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 How can you defeat someone, if every time you have 'em on the ropes.....you quit swinging???? This is bullshit!!!! Kill them motherfuckers....NOW!!! How do you teach lessons.....when you do not punish???
Posted by Halfass Pete 2004-08-14 1:55:42 AM||   2004-08-14 1:55:42 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 This sort of crap must stop. Now. I think Bush is getting some seriously bad advice and it's going to cost him the presidency in November. Then we're really screwed.
Posted by PBMcL 2004-08-14 2:08:02 AM||   2004-08-14 2:08:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 To defeat someone....I mean really DEFEAT someone.... you MUST stomp 'em into the dirt.... AND MAKE 'EM LIKE IT. No negotiations....no bargaining....JUST KICK THEIR FUCKING ASS AND MAKE 'EM REMEMBER IT FOREVER.

We are pussyfootin' around with these filthy muslim animals....tryin' to make sure they retain their dignity, in defeat. A defeat with their permission, if you will.

They must be humiliated, totally stripped of any pretense of dignity, and sent home with their tails tucked between their legs....OR DEAD. You dictate terms of surrender to the defeated, not ask their permission to defeat them. Goddamnit....let's get this thing over with....!!!
Posted by Halfass Pete 2004-08-14 2:24:12 AM||   2004-08-14 2:24:12 AM|| Front Page Top

#6  Mr. Powell set terms that appeared to reflect a growing conviction in Washington that the Najaf confrontation has become a watershed, with repercussions that could crucially affect American hopes of wresting order out of what has become an increasingly chaotic situation across much of Iraq.

Along with Mr. Sadr throwing much of Shiite Iraq into turmoil, Sunni Muslim insurgents in a dozen cities have so defied American troops and the government in Baghdad as to have reduced much of Iraq into a patchwork of rebellion and disorder.

This is what happens when you don't do as you say you're going to do. If you say you're going to capture or kill someone, do it. If you're going to bring some order into all this chaos, do it! If either of those two require some harsh measures, including imposing martial law, or a curfew, or whatever, by all means DO IT! These Shiite assholes are playing our (well, most of "our", except for myself) "compassions" like a damn fiddle, and they're getting the better of us.
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-08-14 2:25:34 AM||   2004-08-14 2:25:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 The Only rational reason for this pull back in Najaf is that al-Sadr has in fact wired the Imam Ali Mosque for detonation should any forces, Iraqi or US, attempt to storm the Mosque.That is a result that neither Allawi or we can live with.

The phrase, "Opperational Pause," certainly after Falluja, just sticks in my craw...but this possible blowing up of the Imam Ali Mosque is at the bottom of this.

I would also hazzard to guess that Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani gave tacit approval to this action initially, but the final assualt has, once again, taken too long in coming and the pressure is on him now to help broker the cease-fire, whereas before he had washed his hands of Sadr.

This is all depressing, but this is my analysis of what is going on. Checkmated by al-Sadr yet once again.

Sadr should have been assassinated almost a year ago when I first recommended it here.

Best Wishes,

Traveller

Posted by Traveller 2004-08-14 5:46:53 AM||   2004-08-14 5:46:53 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Sometimes it is more important to teach a lesson than to prove a point. The Marines have demonstrated without question that they could destroy the ragtag Sadr mob anytime they choose.

But it is necessary for the Iraqi leadeship to handle the final disposition Najaf. Having the US decide the outcome does the Iraqi government no good.

The image of hundreds of slaughtered Iraquis surrounding the shrine would not be a positive image to carry once the mainstream media started twisting the story of the Massacre of Najaf. Remember Waco?

And we are not done with Fallujah yet. It has gone below the radar.

Posted by john  2004-08-14 7:59:04 AM||   2004-08-14 7:59:04 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 These fundamentalists need to be given no mercy. What good would would it serve if the bastard recovers. More chaos , more innocent deaths
Posted by Niceguy 2004-08-14 8:07:14 AM||   2004-08-14 8:07:14 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 On the very plus side, the good guys here are not idiots. Let us examine the situation. Most of Tater's people have been, I suspect, intentionally driven into the shrine. There is now a double cordon of Marines sieging it--no one out, and especially, no one in.
Undoubtedly they have cut off the electricity, sewer and water. The high temperature today is 110F. With 1000 to 2000 men in that building, it is *not* going to be a pleasant place to hang out for any length of time.
You'll note that one of Tater's top five demands is to "restore essential services to Najaf."

Once again, I will predict that after a time, pistol shots will be heard inside the mosque. Then a large contingent will frog walk out the door with their hands on their heads. Last but not least there will be a scramble by the few remaining hard corps, who will waltz into a free fire zone from Hell.
The plan is not just for them to lose, but for them to be utterly humiliated and to lose face so much that they become an embarrassment to their own families.
Posted by Anonymoose 2004-08-14 9:10:26 AM||   2004-08-14 9:10:26 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 Tear gas the shrine and if they don't run out with their hand up, then shoot them down like the morons they are.
Posted by ed 2004-08-14 9:18:37 AM||   2004-08-14 9:18:37 AM|| Front Page Top

#12 News Flash: The Marines were right to set up a double cordon. Sadr supporters are flooding into Najaf hoping to relieve Sadr in the mosque with supplies. This time, unlike Fallujah, it's not going to happen.
The double cordon, or "contravallation", was first invented by Julius Ceaser, to stop such "break-ins" to relieve a siege. By the Middle Ages it came to mean a deep trench with a guard tower surrounding the siege, performing the same function but needing fewer men.
Posted by Anonymoose 2004-08-14 9:21:04 AM||   2004-08-14 9:21:04 AM|| Front Page Top

#13 Hmmmm in that heat, with no water, what's the expiration date for tater tots?
Posted by Frank G  2004-08-14 9:21:15 AM||   2004-08-14 9:21:15 AM|| Front Page Top

#14 The truth is that we checkmated him. He’s only got us in check for the moment by threatening to kick over the board if we move our hand to complete the game.

Tater can’t just blow the mosque – A) cause he doesn’t want to die, and B) because he’s a true-believer and I’m guessing he doesn’t want to blow up the burial site of the founder of Shite and C) Shite’s will be as ticked as if Louis Farrakahan(sp?) blew up a historic church with a favored Saint in it.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that he won’t blow the mosque. I’m just saying it’s unlikely that Tater wants to do it. And if he does, Waco is a good example of the press frenzy and subsequent outrage that will follow.

But if it does happen, the upside is that we’ll be rid of Sadr and his most hardcore followers and the Iranians will need to find a new “popular” leader to rally the masses.
Posted by B 2004-08-14 9:24:04 AM||   2004-08-14 9:24:04 AM|| Front Page Top

#15 oops..i guess Louis F was a poor example...substitute Jessie J.
Posted by B 2004-08-14 9:26:16 AM||   2004-08-14 9:26:16 AM|| Front Page Top

#16 ok..ok..it was just a poor example...but you can get my point. :-(
Posted by B 2004-08-14 9:28:08 AM||   2004-08-14 9:28:08 AM|| Front Page Top

#17 I'm thinking more of "Blazing Saddles" when Cleavon Little held his gun to his own head and said "don't move, or the n****** gets it!"
Posted by Frank G  2004-08-14 9:29:55 AM||   2004-08-14 9:29:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#18 frank..lol! Yep..that's it.
Posted by B 2004-08-14 10:05:46 AM||   2004-08-14 10:05:46 AM|| Front Page Top

#19 Iraqi forces will be the ones to enter and clear the shrine. Hopefully some will infiltrate and cap the triggermen up close and personal and prevent detonation. They will finally use that Iraqi "Special Forces" battalion hey have been training for months over there. See my comments on how the "failed negotiations" thread - and how they look to me to be a setup.
Posted by Oldspook 2004-08-14 11:02:22 AM||   2004-08-14 11:02:22 AM|| Front Page Top

#20 I thought we had learned to not negotiate with terrorists.
Posted by Tom 2004-08-14 1:58:57 PM||   2004-08-14 1:58:57 PM|| Front Page Top

#21 You people don't understand the nuances involved in fighting a sensitive, wholesome and nutrituious war.
Posted by Shipman 2004-08-14 8:28:07 PM||   2004-08-14 8:28:07 PM|| Front Page Top

#22 Dammit I mean a sensitive nurturing sort of coflict, a warm war not too hot and not too cold but just right.
Posted by Kofi Kofi Anon 2004-08-14 8:30:53 PM||   2004-08-14 8:30:53 PM|| Front Page Top

#23 Guys - they needed a coupel days operational pause to set up the cordons, briung up supplies and rest the line troops.

Thats why.

And they gave the guy a last chance to walk, and they stopped fighting over the Holy Day (for added political bonus).

Look for more detail in the other thread.
Posted by Oldspook 2004-08-14 9:14:27 PM||   2004-08-14 9:14:27 PM|| Front Page Top

22:35 CrazyFool
21:01 Anonymous4870
01:33 Zenster
01:15 Bryan
01:09 Bryan
00:51 GK
00:51 Bryan
00:47 trailing wife
00:44 Bryan
00:44 Old Patriot
00:36 trailing wife
00:35 Bryan
00:34 trailing wife
00:34 someone
00:32 trailing wife
00:31 trailing wife
00:25 trailing wife
00:21 trailing wife
00:02 Bryan
23:49 3dc
23:49 RWV
23:49 Aris Katsaris
23:44 Laurence of the Rats
23:33 muck4doo









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com