Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 02/24/2005 View Wed 02/23/2005 View Tue 02/22/2005 View Mon 02/21/2005 View Sun 02/20/2005 View Sat 02/19/2005 View Fri 02/18/2005
1
2005-02-24 Afghanistan/South Asia
Rangers Equipped With Strykers
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2005-02-24 11:03:18 AM|| || Front Page|| [9 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 This just plain doesn't compute. In a way, it is like issuing horses to infantry--they cease being infantry--but even more so. The Stryker is designed to work in concert with other Strykers. By comparison, the progenitor of the Stryker was used in South Africa for bush patrols in the early 1980s. But then, add that to the mission of the Rangers, which is medium to long range combat patrolling through hostile territory, and it makes no sense. Now, granted, I'm sure the Rangers can think up something creative to do with them, but they would if you gave them something else odd, like light artillery or fifteen field kitchens. The one other possibility that comes to mind is if they want to get into and out of Pakistan in a hurry.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-02-24 5:20:24 PM||   2005-02-24 5:20:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Anonymoose -
It seems to me the part about the satcom systems and the remote turret controls - not standard Stryker equipment - indicates that the Rangers may be up to something...

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2005-02-24 9:14:11 PM||   2005-02-24 9:14:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Foot infantry are mobilized all the time in American practice. Infantry division after infantry division were "motorized" on the fly during the Normandy breakout and pursuit. Wilder's "Lightning Brigade" in the Union Army of the Cumberland is an even older example of foot converted to dragoons, when the resources were available.

Once you start putting Rangers in armored humvees, there's no good reason why not Strykers, aside from the training issue. Except expense and availability, I suppose. Aren't they busy Strykerifying a lot of brigades stateside? I know that the 2nd Cavalry is converting to Strykers, and the 28th Infantry Division here in Pennsylvania was getting ready to convert one of its heavy infantry units to a rapid-deployment Stryker brigade. There must be a lot of Stryker units training up if the 28th is getting them. Wonder what the Stryker production numbers look like?

Hmm. Looks fairly restrained. Some 2000 vehicles among the various subclasses, spread out over six brigades.

That's the 25th Infantry's 1st Brigade, the 2nd Infantry's brigade, the 2nd Cavalry Regiment, the 28th Infantry's brigade, one mentioned in Alaska (172 Separate Armored Brigade) - where's the sixth brigade? Ah! Another brigade for the 25th.

Damn, that's an average cost of $4 million per vehicle - these aren't cheap rides, even before maintenance gets factored in...
Posted by Mitch H.  2005-02-24 9:25:46 PM|| [http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2005-02-24 9:25:46 PM|| Front Page Top

23:54 spiffo
23:53 FlameBait
23:19 Anymous 111111111111
22:59 BH
22:55 .com
22:50 FlameBait
22:47 SteveS
22:44 FlameBait
22:41 FlameBait
22:40 .com
22:33 Robert Crawford
22:28 .com
22:23 BH
22:18 Mike Kozlowski
22:15 Silentbrick
21:58 Bomb-a-rama
21:54 trailing wife
21:50 Bomb-a-rama
21:48 Bomb-a-rama
21:46 FlameBait
21:40 FlameBait
21:34 Mike Kozlowski
21:25 Mitch H.
21:24 3dc









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com