Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 03/09/2005 View Tue 03/08/2005 View Mon 03/07/2005 View Sun 03/06/2005 View Sat 03/05/2005 View Fri 03/04/2005 View Thu 03/03/2005
1
2005-03-09 Great White North
(Canadian) Military intelligence warns that avian flu could be used as weapon
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by phil_b 2005-03-09 6:38:33 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Er... yeah, on chickens.

SARS is not that contaigious. It is about as contaigious as Ebola and far less contaigious than smallpox. You have to be exposed to infected body fluids to catch SARS. The bacteria claimed to cause SARS is common, worldwide.

Look here on my blog for more info.
Posted by Chuck Simmins  2005-03-09 12:40:59 PM|| [http://blog.simmins.org]  2005-03-09 12:40:59 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Chuck, the reason the reason a pandemic is predicted, is every time we get a new H variant of the flu we get a pandemic The bird flu is a new H variant.

Viruses evolve very rapidly for reasons that are only partly understood. In a very short period (days) you can get different strains that differ radically in both how infectious they are and how lethal they are. Even with the couple of thousand who got SARS some chains of infection killed a high proportion of those infected and some just gave mild flu like symptoms. Similarly with how infectious they are. One person in a Hong Kong elevator resulted in several hundred people being infected (many through casual contact) and scores of deaths.

Viruses are very different to bacteria. You can't make blanket statements about how infectious they are except in an after the fact statistical sense.

In my VHO opinion we were lucky that SARS never got into a population where effective disease control measures could not be used (like Africa and large parts of Asia). If it had then it would have been a very different story.
Posted by phil_b 2005-03-09 3:48:10 PM||   2005-03-09 3:48:10 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 I could paint an extremely scary scenario that has many thousands, perhaps millions on the move fleeing the disease and seeking treatment. These are well documented historical responses to epidemics. Where do you think they will head? Thats right the developed countries. Will border guards shoot to kill people who are just seeking medical help? Becuase that is what is needed. Within a week you would have thousands of sick people. The healthcare system is overwhelmed and shuts down. Within two weeks societies and global communications shutdown as people stay at home and wait for the epidemic to pass. Who knows what will happen then. China sees its opportunity to take back Taiwan?
Posted by phil_b 2005-03-09 4:10:45 PM||   2005-03-09 4:10:45 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 phil_b - China makes a move like that during such events and they will appear to be guilty of deliberately spreading the disease in order to take advantage of the chaos, especially if its an Asian strain virus.

Truly guilty or not, it would seem to me to be an awful risk on China's part. They wouldn't want to get blamed for the disease (and people will be looking for somebody to blame), especially if it is killing large numbers of Americans. Giving even the appearance of being behind an epidemic is a very dangerous thing.
Posted by Laurence of the Rats  2005-03-09 4:32:05 PM|| [http://www.punictreachery.com/]  2005-03-09 4:32:05 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Phil, Phil, oh, Phil, the United States deals with epidemics every year. Influenza, 200,000 plus hospitializations. West Nile. Lyme Disease. Dengue fever. Plague. HIV. And so on and so on.

Smallpox didn't happen. Anthrax didn't kill hundreds. Swine Flu was a bust. Avain flu is the "panic du jour".

SARS is believed to be caused by a common bacteria.

21% of the deaths due to SARS were medical professionals. The MD that discovered SARS died of it. About half the Canadian cases were doctors or other medical professionals. If you get sputum in your face from a SARS patient, you stand a decent chance of catching it. Standard universal precautions will prevent this. Just like with Ebola. The region of China where SARS was first isolated is as Third World as anyplace. The Chinese claim 9% fatalities. In First World countries it was more like 14% IT ISN'T THAT CONTAIGIOUS! SARS Info

The last influenza pandemic was in the 1980's. About 36,000 died in the U.S., and the CDC believes about 34,000 Americans die of influenza in a typical year. The avain flu has been known since 1997 or so. The vast majority of people who catch it deal directly with chickens and ducks. The number of cases where human to human transmittal can be demonstrated is less than 15, probably less than 10. The vast majority of avain flu cases involve conjunctivitis, a minor eye infection.

I won't say never, but rarely does a disease mutate to a deadlier form. That's why syphilis, for example, is far, far less deadly than it was 300 years ago. The same for measles. In the eight years since we identified bird flu, it hasn't gotten deadlier, nor more contaigious.

I'd love to see your cite for the Hong Kong elevator story. The woman who was Patient Zero for Canada was sick during her entire trip by plane from China to Toronto and no one on her plane flight caught SARS. Most of the Hong Kong cases were due to a building construction problem where there was a connection between waste water and fresh water in two apartment buildings. It's against code in the U.S., for just that reason.
Posted by Chuck Simmins  2005-03-09 4:43:52 PM|| [http://blog.simmins.org]  2005-03-09 4:43:52 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 It's better to be a cautious fool than a dead fool, Chuck.
Posted by twobyfour 2005-03-09 4:51:06 PM||   2005-03-09 4:51:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Chuck, SARS is caused by a coronavirus. Viruses replicate by a completely different mechanism to bacteria. They change very quickly. Forget what you know about organisms evolving over long periods. It doesn't apply to Viruses.

The red flag is asymptomatic spread and I tend to agree with Dr. Niman that this is already occuring and it is too late to stop a pandemic. It remains to be seen if this of 1918/19 severity.
Posted by phil_b 2005-03-09 5:19:18 PM||   2005-03-09 5:19:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Current thinking is the problem could escalate if two viruses infect the same host and interchange their DNA/proteins/whatever, thereby creating a new strain. Apparently, this is one way virals strains change and adapt.

On the other hand, the faster a virus kills (or even incapacitates) its host, the smaller the range of infection, as victims die off before they get a chance to spread it around.
Posted by Bobby 2005-03-09 5:28:28 PM||   2005-03-09 5:28:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Here is a source for the HK elevator origin of SARS in Singapore. It also helps explain why asymptomatic spread is the real problem.
Posted by phil_b 2005-03-09 5:36:29 PM||   2005-03-09 5:36:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 I have been reading Dr. Niman for a while now and I don't understand his logic, other than he thinks a much more aggressive monitoring program is needed. If there are lots of asymptomatic cases, then it's true the virus has spread a lot farther than anyone realizes, but it also means the mortality rate is a lot lower than the 72% that has been publicized. I'm not a doctor, but wouldn't a preponderance of asymptomatic cases also mean that the human immune system has been exposed to the virus before and evolved an immune response to it?
Posted by HV 2005-03-09 6:39:49 PM||   2005-03-09 6:39:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 HV, there is no way to prevent flu infection - immunization/vaccines don't work becuase we can't develop them quickly enough to keep up with the rapidly changing virus. There is no cure for the flu. There is no reliable test that works quickly enough to be clinically useful.

So the main way to stop its spread is to isolate infected people. This is only effective when people present with recognizable symptoms. Dr Niman thinks that flu infections result in a wide range of symptoms that are not being recognized as flu and many people have only mild symptoms. I.e. both groups are not being identified and isolated and the virus spreads. Becuase the virus changes so rapidly at any time the relatively benign version changes into the killer version. If enough people are infected with the benign version and not isolated, you will get lethal cases occuring all over and far too many for the isolation regime to be implemented. It will then for all practical purposes infect everyone on the planet.

What many people fail to appreciate is fast this will spread. If it is infectious enough and the flu historically is very infectious, most places in the world will have major outbreaks within a matter of weeks. I am deeply sceptical that developed countries (except perhaps islands) can react quickly enough to stop it.
Posted by phil_b 2005-03-09 6:57:00 PM||   2005-03-09 6:57:00 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 this is exactly why I wear a condom when intimate with a duck
Posted by Frank G  2005-03-09 7:13:59 PM||   2005-03-09 7:13:59 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Have you imman check the duck and you have nothing to worry about Frank.
Posted by Shipman 2005-03-09 7:55:32 PM||   2005-03-09 7:55:32 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 My bad. Of course it's a coronavirus. Brain fart on my part.

However... there have only been three flu pandemics since 1900. I'm not at all certain that the cause of the Spanish Flu has been definitively demonstrated. All of the speculation about flu pandemics is based on three recorded occurances, hardly a large data set. I agree, and have said so on my blog, that a pandemic will happen. We just plain don't have enough data to say where or when. Avain flu is just as likely to be another Swine Flu as it is to be a Hong Kong flu.

The mortality rate for avain flu is far lower than 72%. As I point out in my blog entry, a 2003 outbreak in the Netherlands, of 89 cases, there were 78 cases of conjunctivitis. In 2004, a Canadian outbreak was limited to eye infections. Remember that mortality in this disease is primarily influenced by the health and economic status of the patient. Many of the people who are dying of this are members of a social and economic class that dies from a lot of diseases.

Dr. Niman raises some interesting points. However, we already know that most illnesses vary in the degree of their severity in patients. West Nile, for example, and smallpox. It is not a surprise to find family members testing positive but without reported symptoms. Having to rely on patients to accurately report mild symptoms days or weeks after they happened is one of the bugs in epidemiology.

Dr. Niman is correct in questioning the monitoring in non First World nations. I was very critical of the Chinese numbers during the SARS outbreak. Heck, even the American numbers. The problem with all monitoring programs, even the CDC's influenza program, is that it requires patients to be sick enough to need a doctor. Everything after that is an educated guess, but still a guess. For every patient that is identified, how many were not, and to what degree did their illness progress?

Another interesting question that Phil raises is the level of illness that causes social breakdown. We have records of the Black Death, and it would be tempting to draw conclusions from that era. In actuality, our society may be complex enough that an incapacitation rate of 10% might be enough to create social breakdown. Or, it could be as high as 50%. Or, depending on the circumstances, it could be the ten people who know how to keep the Northeast power grid up and running. .00000001%, but a vital %.

BTW, the SARS elevator thing isn't. The cite says the elevator lobby, and the CDC says:
Hong Kong. As of March 25, the Hong Kong Department of Health (DH) reported 290 suspected and probable SARS cases. Beginning on March 11, an increase in acute pneumonia cases among health-care workers (HCWs) at hospital 1 in Hong Kong was reported to DH. Epidemiologic investigation has linked these cases to an index patient (Patient J) who visited a friend in hotel M in late February, became ill a few days later, and was admitted to hospital 1 on March 4 (Figure 1). Patient J visited hotel M while patient A, an ill visitor from Guangdong province, was staying there.

As of March 25, a cluster of 13 persons with suspected/probable SARS are known to have stayed at hotel M (Figure 1). The index patient (patient A) had onset of symptoms on February 15. He traveled from Guangdong province to Hong Kong to visit family and stayed on the ninth floor of the hotel on February 21. He was admitted to hospital 2 on February 22 and died the next day. Four HCWs and two of his family members subsequently became ill; one family member died. Of the 12 other patients linked to hotel M, 10 were in the hotel the same day as the index patient; the other two patients (patients L and M) stayed in the hotel during the time that three other symptomatic patients were guests in the hotel. Nine of the 13 patients, including patient A, stayed on the ninth floor; one stayed on the 14th floor; one stayed on the 11th floor; and two stayed on both the ninth and 14th floors.
Posted by Chuck Simmins  2005-03-09 8:37:55 PM|| [http://blog.simmins.org]  2005-03-09 8:37:55 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 Lift, Lift lobby, the point is it was casual contact in a public place.

At its peak there were perhaps 3 dozen active SARS cases in Singapore and two major hospitals were shutdown. It made me realize how easily a healthcare system could be overwhelmed. One major difference between now and 1918 is people have vastly better access to information. Some will stay away from work but I still think the big risk is from sick or worried migrants seeking better healthcare and government inertia in changing how it deals with them, which puts places where developed coutries border undeveloped countries at most risk.
Posted by phil_b 2005-03-09 10:29:04 PM||   2005-03-09 10:29:04 PM|| Front Page Top

00:02 Deacon Blues
23:59 Cyber Sarge
23:54 Eric Jablow
23:52 .com
23:37 Bobby
23:24 Silentbrick
23:24 Bobby
23:22 Deacon Blues
23:16 CrazyFool
23:12 Peppah
23:10 trailing wife
23:06 CrazyFool
23:05 Alaska Paul
23:04 Frank G
23:03 Frank G
23:02 Peppah
23:01 Bobby
22:56 trailing wife
22:52 trailing wife
22:52 Frank G
22:51 Silentbrick
22:51 Bomb-a-rama
22:50 Deacon Blues
22:48 Alaska Paul









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com