Article

2005-04-17 Home Front: Politix

Declassified documents undercut Atta in Prague claim

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2005-04-17 12:28:40 AM|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I'm dissapointed in The Telegraph. According to the report the documents present no new evidence and hence all previous evidence of Atta's trip to Prague stands uncontested.

Posted by phil_b 2005-04-17 9:02:19 AM|| 2005-04-17 9:02:19 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Unless the Czech officials reverse their position that Atta met twice with Iraqi agents, that's all the 'cooperation' I need evidence for. This reads as pure ankle-biting / editorializing.

Well, to the extent they can be differentiated.

Posted by Raj 2005-04-17 11:22:47 AM|| 2005-04-17 11:22:47 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Eh? Levin's off-message. The Democrat talking point is that we went into Iraq to deal with WMD (that weren't there).

But, yeah, until the Czechs say they were wrong, I don't believe anything that a Democrat selectively leaks from the CIA.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2005-04-17 12:06:08 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/] 2005-04-17 12:06:08 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 So, whom would I trust? Czech Intel/Iterior officials or...MSM/CIA/Donk spinmasters?

I go with Czechs.

Posted by Sobiesky 2005-04-17 7:57:50 PM|| 2005-04-17 7:57:50 PM|| Front Page Top

00:04 Sherry
23:58 Huputch Jesh6219
23:08 Spemble
23:08 Frank G
23:02 Sock Puppet 0â Doom
22:58 mom
22:52 Frank G
22:50 mom
22:49 Frank G
22:48 Chinese Unoque7533
22:46 mom
22:43 Zhang Fei
22:41 phil_b
22:37 Frank G
22:34 Pappy
22:23 CrazyFool
22:12 smn
22:08 phil_b
22:08 smn
22:05 thibaud (aka lex)
22:02 .com
22:02 thibaud (aka lex)
22:00 Penguin
21:52 badanov