Article

2005-06-29 Home Front: Politix

Court to politicians: Thou shalt not promote religion

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Spavirt Pheng6042 2005-06-29 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 It's all about context, therefore the Supremes have set themselves up as art critics. The question they left open is "How many non-Judeochristian items does it take in an art installation to sufficiently 'dilute' the impact of the Ten Commandments?"

May God bless this honorable court...

Posted by eLarson 2005-06-29 08:09|| http://larsonian.blogspot.com]">[http://larsonian.blogspot.com] 2005-06-29 08:09|| Front Page Top

#2 A very careful middle path needs to be taken here. For every unfair effort to supress religion in the US, there is, and has in past been many more, efforts to foist religion on the unwilling. I, for one, want a judge who follows the *law*, rather than one who either does what his shaman says, or what his "heart" says. "He is innocent because he attends my church", is just as offensive as "he is guilty because his kind are always guilty."

Posted by Anonymoose 2005-06-29 13:54|| 2005-06-29 13:54|| Front Page Top

23:59 trailing wife
23:56 Frank G
23:51 trailing wife
23:45 muck4doo
23:41 Rex Mundi
23:29 Rex Mundi
23:27 Just About Enough!
23:26 Just About Enough!
23:25 Just About Enough!
23:22 .com
23:14 ed
23:12 ed
23:06 .com
23:05 half
23:03 Atomic Conspiracy
23:00 Shipman
22:59 Just About Enough!
22:59 Shipman
22:58 Just About Enough!
22:57 abu Bruce
22:55 Shipman
22:54 Threresing Crinerong3617
22:54 Just About Enough!
22:52 .com