Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 07/05/2005 View Mon 07/04/2005 View Sun 07/03/2005 View Sat 07/02/2005 View Fri 07/01/2005 View Thu 06/30/2005 View Wed 06/29/2005
1
2005-07-05 -Short Attention Span Theater-
Footsteps in time that add 30,000 years to history of America
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2005-07-05 13:40|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Are we sure it wasn't just mammoths with fake human feet like in the Wile E. Coyote cartoons?
Posted by Jonathan">Jonathan  2005-07-05 14:06||   2005-07-05 14:06|| Front Page Top

#2 There has actually been quite a few sites that suggest a human presence in the America's from 50,000BC on. They all get dismissed as "we're not sure,the data looks right,but we'll have to wait and see." Very tough to get orthodox thought changed in the Universities.(One reason why they are still full of Marxists,etc.)
BTW,there have been several occasions when the Siberia-Alaska corridor was passable,including @ 50,000,30,000 and 20,000 yrs ago.
Posted by Stephen 2005-07-05 14:14||   2005-07-05 14:14|| Front Page Top

#3 Now that we've got it sorted, who gets the real estate for the casino and "cultural" museum?
Posted by Tkat 2005-07-05 14:21||   2005-07-05 14:21|| Front Page Top

#4 I'd say these footprints were made by a BigFoot at the time trying to prove the existence of mythical nearly-hairless biped creatures with little feet.....
Posted by CrazyFool 2005-07-05 14:26||   2005-07-05 14:26|| Front Page Top

#5 CAIR claims them as early American muslims in 5...4...3...2...
Posted by BH 2005-07-05 15:00||   2005-07-05 15:00|| Front Page Top

#6 Let's see the damn injuns claim a 50,000 year old skeleton of a Homo Robustus as their ancestor...
Posted by mojo">mojo  2005-07-05 15:10||   2005-07-05 15:10|| Front Page Top

#7 Ho. Lee. Sh. It.

Gonna be lots of Native American activists popping Tums tonight.

This needs to be forwarded to McCain's office; maybe he'll back away from his "bury the bones" bill to change NAGPRA so the tribes can destroy all evidence of the people they replaced.
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-07-05 15:14|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-07-05 15:14|| Front Page Top

#8 BTW,there have been several occasions when the Siberia-Alaska corridor was passable,including @ 50,000,30,000 and 20,000 yrs ago.

Actually, it's not all that clear there ever WAS an ice-free land corridor. Coastal routes are infinitely more likely.

Of course, even the most up-to-date museums still peddle the Clovis-first carp.
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-07-05 15:25|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-07-05 15:25|| Front Page Top

#9 Probably just some nitwit kid walking in the wet concrete. Or maybe an early version of the walk of the holywood stars where they put their handprints in wet concrete.
Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues  2005-07-05 15:25||   2005-07-05 15:25|| Front Page Top

#10 There has been proof for years that the Clovis people were not first, and there is even proof that the Clovis people exterminated the people that were here before them. Of course, all of this has been surpressed by Indian activists and their lawyers, claiming that the white man stole their land and now is trying to steal their history.
Never mind the facts and the science, move along, nothing to see here.
Posted by mmurray821 2005-07-05 15:34||   2005-07-05 15:34|| Front Page Top

#11 wuz their evere em lan bridje to hawiai?

thatn a long bote trip.
Posted by muck4doo 2005-07-05 16:04|| http://meatismurder.blogspot.com/]">[http://meatismurder.blogspot.com/]  2005-07-05 16:04|| Front Page Top

#12 Godammer Ima tell you never, never, never look under the Clovis layer. There is nothing thereto interest you.

/white folks in kyaks
Posted by Shipman 2005-07-05 16:28||   2005-07-05 16:28|| Front Page Top

#13 Don't forget that 9,000 y.o. Kennewick Man showed no substantial genetic relations to any of the four tribes that claimed him as an ancestor, especially ironic given his caucasoid features, hmm?
Posted by Armchair in Sin">Armchair in Sin  2005-07-05 17:46||   2005-07-05 17:46|| Front Page Top

#14 Hell hath no fury like an archeological theory spurned.
Posted by Xbalanke 2005-07-05 18:01||   2005-07-05 18:01|| Front Page Top

#15 See I tolda ja!
Posted by Ward Churchill Injun Man 2005-07-05 19:14||   2005-07-05 19:14|| Front Page Top

23:46 RWV
23:45 Phil Fraering
23:40 trailing wife
23:38 trailing wife
23:36 OldSpook
23:31 Cyber Sarge
23:18 R
23:13 trailing wife
23:10 JosephMendiola
23:01 JosephMendiola
22:57 trailing wife
22:55 LC FOTSGreg
22:51 badanov
22:49 JosephMendiola
22:40 Darth VAda
22:38 Frank G
22:36 .com
22:33 Atomic Conspiracy
22:28 mmurray821
22:18 LC FOTSGreg
22:14 Old Patriot
22:13 Alaska Paul
22:08 LC FOTSGreg
22:06 .com









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com