Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 07/05/2005 View Mon 07/04/2005 View Sun 07/03/2005 View Sat 07/02/2005 View Fri 07/01/2005 View Thu 06/30/2005 View Wed 06/29/2005
1
2005-07-05 Home Front: Culture Wars
Who Else Should Pay Reparations? (Hint: It starts with "D")
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut 2005-07-05 13:45|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 LOL!
Posted by Secret Master 2005-07-05 13:55||   2005-07-05 13:55|| Front Page Top

#2 These are amazing times, lol!
Posted by .com 2005-07-05 13:59||   2005-07-05 13:59|| Front Page Top

#3 I am all behind it. Proceed with all due speed Digby!
Posted by Sock Puppet 0’ Doom 2005-07-05 14:21||   2005-07-05 14:21|| Front Page Top

#4 Excellent!
Of course, you would have to sue the ACLU and the NAACP since they aided and abetted the Democratic Party.
Posted by mmurray821 2005-07-05 15:08||   2005-07-05 15:08|| Front Page Top

#5 mmurray - That works for me. :-D
Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut  2005-07-05 15:20||   2005-07-05 15:20|| Front Page Top

#6 Quick, how old is Rove?
Posted by Captain America 2005-07-05 20:13||   2005-07-05 20:13|| Front Page Top

#7 Missed the Democrats lead on filibustering the federal anti-lynching statute and various civil rights legislation.
Posted by Whomoting Shomp1655 2005-07-05 20:48||   2005-07-05 20:48|| Front Page Top

#8 Nice try, Dr. Goebbels, but it was the Dems who stonewalled the anti-lynching statutes (of which there were many over the years):

Detroit News
While President Franklin D. Roosevelt was kept by fear of alienating the Southern powers in Congress from throwing his influence openly behind anti-lynching legislation, his Justice Department's newly created Civil Rights Division played a key role. In the early 1940s, division attorneys hit upon the idea of reviving old Reconstruction-era federal criminal statutes, which forbade conspiracies aimed at denying a citizen's civil rights and specifically those that did so in collaboration with the police.

Due to constitutional questions about these statutes' enforcement, and the perennial lack of cooperation from Southern federal judges and grand juries, efforts to use these federal laws were staggered over many years.

But the continued intercession of federal justice, and the unflagging legal and public relations efforts by the NAACP, helped to drive lynching underground. (emphasis added)

Posted by Atomic Conspiracy 2005-07-05 21:18||   2005-07-05 21:18|| Front Page Top

#9 As for filibustering civil rights legislation:

Civil Rights Act of 1964
Senator Richard Russell, Democrat from Georgia, led the so-called opposition forces. The group was also known as the "southern bloc." It was composed of eighteen southern Democrats and one Republican, John Tower of Texas. Although a hopeless minority, the group exerted much influence because Senate rules virtually guaranteed unlimited debate unless it was ended by cloture. The "southern bloc" relied on the filibuster to postpone the legislation as long as possible, hoping that support for civil rights legislation throughout the country would falter. .......
The Republican Party was not so badly split as the Democrats by the civil rights issue. Only one Republican senator participated in the filibuster against the bill. In fact, since 1933, Republicans had a more positive record on civil rights than the Democrats. In the twenty-six major civil rights votes since 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 % of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 % of the votes.
.....
Two days later, the Senate passed the bill by a 73 to 27 roll call vote. Six Republicans and 21 Democrats held firm and voted against passage.


The climax of the filibuster was a 14 hour 13 minute harangue in opposition to the bill from none other than Sen. Robert "Sheets" Byrd of West Virginia.
Posted by Atomic Conspiracy 2005-07-05 21:44||   2005-07-05 21:44|| Front Page Top

#10 Sorry about the Goebbels crack. I cut and pasted this from my response to a government archivist who had implied very strongly that the Repubs had filibustered the anti-lynching statutes.

Seems to be a regular practice these days for Dem apologists to re-write history whenver possible.
Posted by Atomic Conspiracy 2005-07-05 21:52||   2005-07-05 21:52|| Front Page Top

#11 Seems to be a regular practice these days for Dem apologists to re-write history whenver possible.

It's a lot less risky than standing on principle and making history for the right things in the first place
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2005-07-05 22:01||   2005-07-05 22:01|| Front Page Top

#12 AC, are you a Firesign Theater "fan"?
Posted by .com 2005-07-05 22:02||   2005-07-05 22:02|| Front Page Top

23:46 RWV
23:45 Phil Fraering
23:40 trailing wife
23:38 trailing wife
23:36 OldSpook
23:31 Cyber Sarge
23:18 R
23:13 trailing wife
23:10 JosephMendiola
23:01 JosephMendiola
22:57 trailing wife
22:55 LC FOTSGreg
22:51 badanov
22:49 JosephMendiola
22:40 Darth VAda
22:38 Frank G
22:36 .com
22:33 Atomic Conspiracy
22:28 mmurray821
22:18 LC FOTSGreg
22:14 Old Patriot
22:13 Alaska Paul
22:08 LC FOTSGreg
22:06 .com









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com