Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 10/17/2005 View Sun 10/16/2005 View Sat 10/15/2005 View Fri 10/14/2005 View Thu 10/13/2005 View Wed 10/12/2005 View Tue 10/11/2005
1
2005-10-17 Iraq
U.S.: 70 Iraqis Killed in Airstrikes
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Ebberemp Angomolet7575 2005-10-17 07:54|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 If they run they ar al-qaida, if they don't run they are well-disciplined al-qaida.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2005-10-17 08:43||   2005-10-17 08:43|| Front Page Top

#2 The men ran into a nearby house, where gunmen were seen unloading weapons. An F/A-18 warplane struck the building with a bomb, killing 40 insurgents, the military said.

Witnesses said at least 14 of the dead were civilians.


The press needs a short lesson in the facts of war: When an unlawful combatant hides behind civilians, the deaths of those civilians is HIS FAULT.
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-10-17 08:49|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-10-17 08:49|| Front Page Top

#3 Here's the actual press release from MNF-Iraq.
While conducting a combat air patrol, crewmembers from an F -15 observed 20 men arrive in four vehicles at the crater site of a previously-detonated IED which had killed five U.S. and two Iraqi Soldiers on Oct. 15. The terrorists were in the process of emplacing another IED in the same spot when the F- 15 engaged them with a precision-guided bomb, resulting in the death of terrorists on the ground.

At approximately 7:30 p.m., a UH-1N Huey and AH-1W Cobra helicopter team on patrol north of Ramadi had been observing a group of military age males gathered at a suspected terrorist safe house. After realizing their position had been compromised, the terrorists fled the scene and engaged the Cobra with small arms fire. The Cobra returned fire with 20 mm. munitions, resulting in the death of an estimated 10 terrorists. At approximately 7:50 p.m., a team of F/A-18’s resumed observation at the suspected safe house where they found an additional 35-40 terrorists loading their vehicles with weapons and driving to another location to unload the weapons. The F/A-18 targeted the terrorists with a precision-guided bomb, killing terrorists on the ground. The combined strikes resulted in approximately 50 terrorists killed.

Posted by Chuck Simmins">Chuck Simmins  2005-10-17 09:00|| http://blog.simmins.org]">[http://blog.simmins.org]  2005-10-17 09:00|| Front Page Top

#4 bout time, I always wondered why they let the Terrorist dance around our burning vechles for the cameras. If you are praising and showing out were a US vehicle is destroyed you are a enemy or at the least a enemy supporter. period. I am still waiting for another thing I have been wanting to see that is carpet bombings of those freeken enemy protest were they burn flags march dressed in suicide belts ect...anyone at those protest are eiter enemy enemy supporters or maybe some of our spys gathering intel (they could be advised to miss a day), when those can be bombed it will be a good day for us and bad for our enemy.
Posted by C-Low 2005-10-17 09:33||   2005-10-17 09:33|| Front Page Top

#5 Thanks Chuck

a team of F/A-18’s resumed observation at the suspected safe house where they found an additional 35-40 terrorists

At what altitude do these F/A surreptitiously conduct observation so that they can count up to 35-40 terrorists loading vehicles? Could there be another source of intelligence we do not wish to disclose?
Posted by Claiger Wheatch9865 2005-10-17 09:45||   2005-10-17 09:45|| Front Page Top

#6 At what altitude do these F/A surreptitiously conduct observation so that they can count up to 35-40 terrorists loading vehicles? Could there be another source of intelligence we do not wish to disclose?

As I recall, there's a camera pod on those planes that's simply stunning.
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-10-17 09:53|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-10-17 09:53|| Front Page Top

#7 With real time cockpit display? I'm going to start being more careful when I load the pickup.
Posted by Claiger Wheatch9865 2005-10-17 09:54||   2005-10-17 09:54|| Front Page Top

#8 The F/A-18’s are probably using ATFLIRs with a unclassified range of over 45 miles (probably for a tank sized target) and well out of range for someone to see or hear the aircraft. The F-15s would be using the older LANTIRN pods.
Posted by ed 2005-10-17 10:04||   2005-10-17 10:04|| Front Page Top

#9 From Strategy Page:
The call for F-18s to scan the ground below is all because of the new Advanced Targeting Forward-Looking Infrared (ATFLIR). This $1.2 million device, which is considered about five times more effective than earlier models, can clearly see people on the ground from 40 kilometers away, and 6-7 kilometers up. Pilots can see people with guns hiding on roofs, or behind buildings, waiting to ambush approaching coalition or Iraqi troops or convoys. Magnification at night is 30 times, and 60 times during the day. But at night, the ATFLIR gets sharper images because it is sensing differences in heat below. Things cool off rapidly in Iraq after the sun goes down, everything except the few people running around at night.
Posted by Steve">Steve  2005-10-17 10:45||   2005-10-17 10:45|| Front Page Top

#10 Now, if I saw a Cobra flying by, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't fire on it. But I don't have a death wish.
Posted by WhiteCollarRedneck 2005-10-17 12:19||   2005-10-17 12:19|| Front Page Top

#11 When an unlawful combatant hides behind civilians, the deaths of those civilians is HIS FAULT.

Some would say that is courageous and smart.
Posted by Rafael 2005-10-17 12:45||   2005-10-17 12:45|| Front Page Top

#12 Now, if I saw a Cobra flying by, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't fire on it. But I don't have a death wish.

yea, makes no sense at all..does it. Huumm...pretty stupid in fact..unless someone had a death wish used circular logic with a wet spot in the middle.
Posted by Red Dog 2005-10-17 13:25||   2005-10-17 13:25|| Front Page Top

#13 ...used circular logic with a wet spot in the middle.

woe is me..been there done that.
Posted by 10 minutes before closing time 2005-10-17 13:32||   2005-10-17 13:32|| Front Page Top

#14 OOH-RAH, motherfuckers.
Posted by mojo">mojo  2005-10-17 14:24||   2005-10-17 14:24|| Front Page Top

#15 Time to reintroduce napalm to the battle plan, and use it for car swarms and other "insurgency" gatherings. Screw the Geneva Convention, primarily introduced to defang the US and Britain in the first place. After using it in Vietnam Iraq, we should pump a few million gallons into the UN and light it off there.
Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot  2005-10-17 14:38|| http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]">[http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]  2005-10-17 14:38|| Front Page Top

#16 Like WhiteCollarRedneck said -

"After realizing their position had been compromised, the terrorists fled the scene and engaged the Cobra with small arms fire."

QED: Darwin in action.
Posted by Xbalanke 2005-10-17 15:02||   2005-10-17 15:02|| Front Page Top

#17 But I heard on CNN that these were in fact just crippled children trying help stray puppies find their way home. They were just loading the puppies in the pickup of a man who was on his way to place flowers on his Mother's grave, but stopped to help because he is (or was) a member of the "Religion of Peace"!

You're saying CNN got it wrong??
Posted by Justrand 2005-10-17 16:10||   2005-10-17 16:10|| Front Page Top

#18 Seems to me whenever there's an effective airstrike the press always is able to find a witness who testifies that most of the victims were women, children and handicapped orphans.
Posted by Dixonh2">Dixonh2  2005-10-17 16:25||   2005-10-17 16:25|| Front Page Top

#19 Now, if I saw a Cobra flying by, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't fire on it. But I don't have a death wish.

Ain't that the truth.
Posted by Corvette Owners Everywhere 2005-10-17 17:03||   2005-10-17 17:03|| Front Page Top

#20 My only question: Did the jahadis splat, bounce, or thud?
Posted by Captain America 2005-10-17 17:11||   2005-10-17 17:11|| Front Page Top

#21 Cap, some went splat, some bounced and some thudded, and some did a combination of these.
Posted by Ol Dirty American 2005-10-17 17:41||   2005-10-17 17:41|| Front Page Top

#22 The losers whacked by the Cobra with the 20mm chain gun went 'splat' for sure.

Anybody got a link to the video of the jihadis caught dropping an RPG launcher in the field by a hovering Cobra? It's pretty messy, even through a night vision sight.
Posted by Parabellum 2005-10-17 17:57||   2005-10-17 17:57|| Front Page Top

#23 I was kidding in #17...but then the A/P does me one better.

Look at the photo that accompanies this piece of crap:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051017/ap_on_go_co/democrats_iraq_politics
Posted by Justrand 2005-10-17 18:03||   2005-10-17 18:03|| Front Page Top

#24 I was kidding in #17...but then the A/P does me one better.

Look at the photo that accompanies this piece of crap:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051017/ap_on_go_co/democrats_iraq_politics


Dang...missed 2.
Posted by anymouse">anymouse  2005-10-17 19:02||   2005-10-17 19:02|| Front Page Top

#25 It looks to me like the father has nail polish.
Posted by Mizzou Mafia 2005-10-17 20:23||   2005-10-17 20:23|| Front Page Top

#26 The BBC is claiming it mass murder and they were all, of course, innocent. Not one jurno understands the tech which allows those pilots to be certain they are engaging foes. They are still stuck reporting war as if it was 1950. That is to say "stuck on stupid."
Posted by Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2005-10-17 21:13||   2005-10-17 21:13|| Front Page Top

#27 Spot-on, SPo'D. Effectively, the modern battlefield has been utterly ceded to the US - and we are working very hard to push the edges in every way possible. One of the real surprises, to me, anyway, in that long UK MoD document posted here not long ago, regards the UK's dumping military interoperability with the US in favor of the EU Rapid Vacation Farce, was that they were, basically, Luddites when it came to C&C & battlefield info systems / communications. And they field the only credible force in Europe.

So where is everyone else?

My guesses, in order of sophistication, and the "decade" that seems to best fit their regular (deployable now) conventional force capabilities...

UK: 90s
Israel: 90s
Other Europeans: 90s, but irrelevant - numbers & will missing
Russia: 80s (same problems as circa Afghanistan, methinks)
China: 80s, maybe 70s
PackiWakis: 70s
Iran: 70s
The MSM: Heh, too easy - Vietnam, of course, so 60s
Jihadis: 50s + 7th century

It is, indeed, lonely at the top.

Corrections happily accepted, lol.
Posted by .com 2005-10-17 21:49||   2005-10-17 21:49|| Front Page Top

00:00 Captain America
23:59 CrazyFool
23:26 trailing wife
23:26 Frank G
23:19 .com
23:18 JosephMendiola
23:16 trailing wife
23:08 DMFD
23:06 trailing wife
23:04 Barbara Skolaut
23:03 Barbara Skolaut
23:01 DMFD
22:58 DMFD
22:57 2b
22:54 .com
22:53 .com
22:48 DMFD
22:38 2b
22:37 Snump Phomomp6162
22:37 Rafael
22:36 2b
22:33 .com
22:32 trailing wife
22:30 3dc









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com