Article

2005-12-19 Syria-Lebanon-Iran

U.S. Warns Turkey Of Air Strike On Iran And Syria

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve 2005-12-19 14:36|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Goss said that Tehran sees Turkey as an enemy and would try to âexport its regime.â

Iran doesn't need to export anything; according to some, the current Turkish leadership is quite capably doing that themselves.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-12-19 15:00|| 2005-12-19 15:00|| Front Page Top

#2 Maybe BAR, but they have to sell it to the Turkish General Staff who are PO'd because the bumbling with the Iraq invasion negotiations. The Turkish military has special concerns about the tradition established by Ataturk to keep the government secular. This will be interesting.

Posted by Spuque Elminelet9733 2005-12-19 15:12|| 2005-12-19 15:12|| Front Page Top

#3 As a side note, Istanbul (Constantinopal) is regarded by the "restore-the-Caliphate" crowd as essential to their schemes.

It is as important to pan-Islamism as a seat of Islamic earthly rule, as Mecca is seen as a spiritual one. If you rule Istanbul, then you *are* the Sultan.

I'm also pretty positive that the Turks are well aware of this.

Posted by Anonymoose 2005-12-19 15:21|| 2005-12-19 15:21|| Front Page Top

#4 Israel and Turkey have pretty good relations...think this is smoothing the way for our ops or Israel's?

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2005-12-19 15:28|| 2005-12-19 15:28|| Front Page Top

#5 By "smoothing the way", do you mean telling our dear, personal friends (heh), the Turks, don't even *think* about getting in the way?

Posted by SteveS 2005-12-19 15:47|| 2005-12-19 15:47|| Front Page Top

#6 All we and/or the Israelis need from the Turks is for them to not look at their radar screens for a couple of hours. We'll say when.

Posted by Steve White">Steve White 2005-12-19 15:51|| 2005-12-19 15:51|| Front Page Top

#7 Incerlik

Posted by Heartless Spemble1219 2005-12-19 15:57|| 2005-12-19 15:57|| Front Page Top

#8 What about it?

Posted by lotp 2005-12-19 16:17|| 2005-12-19 16:17|| Front Page Top

#9 This seems like very big news. Could anyone comment on the reliability of the source?

Posted by Jake-the-Peg 2005-12-19 16:24|| 2005-12-19 16:24|| Front Page Top

#10 When I saw the headline I assumed it had to be Debka. I have no idea about the veracity of "the Turkish press" vs. Debka.

Posted by Xbalanke 2005-12-19 18:14|| 2005-12-19 18:14|| Front Page Top

#11 If this story was true the headline would be Porter Goss says Iran already has nukes, it wouldn't bother with the Turkey bit until the third paragraph. Warning Turkey is just how the news apparantly came out.

This story reeks of bovine manure.

Posted by rjschwarz">rjschwarz 2005-12-19 18:14|| 2005-12-19 18:14|| Front Page Top

#12 After Iraq, I remain a skeptic about any Turkey cooperation. One would be a fool to make any assumptions in this regard.

If these meetings actually took place, the Turks have their own version of the WaPo and NY Slimes leaking machines.

I'd be disappointed if such meetings haven't taken place at this juncture. Just as I don't believe VP Cheney is solely on a sightseeing trip to the Middle East. Things are racheting up considerably, and "decisive action" will be taken by the US in '06.

Posted by Captain America 2005-12-19 19:00|| 2005-12-19 19:00|| Front Page Top

#13 Didn't happen, couldn't have happened. Why? The Bush government hardly trusts the Turks.

Posted by CaziFarkus">CaziFarkus 2005-12-19 19:07|| deleted]">[deleted] 2005-12-19 19:07|| Front Page Top

#14 A brief stint with Google suggests that this story is all over the Turkish press, but not mentioned much if at all in the English press except for a few breathless sites.

What does get heavy emphasis is the demand of Turkey that we come down on the PKK in Iraq. Also mentioned was a meeting of several intel agency heads from different countries, not just the US and Turkey. And it was reported that Turkmen in Iraq, and Iraqi expats within Turkey, did vote in the election last week in high numbers.

So several possibilities suggest themselves. One, that we cut a deal with Turkey similar to the one with the Sunnis regarding stability and ethnic participation in the election. Another is that we agreed to help get the PKK off the Turks' backs in exchange for their passive cooperation if the ball goes down on Iran.

Or perhaps this is intended to raise concerns and gin up opposition to use of Turkish airspace during any attack, or to raise support for aggressive moves by Turkish troops into northern Iraq if we're busy elsewhere.

I haven't a clue as to the likelihood of any of these .... and maybe there are other possibilities as well?

Posted by lotp 2005-12-19 19:10|| 2005-12-19 19:10|| Front Page Top

#15 This could also just be a psy op designed to get Syria and Iran's attention and see where the scurrying occurs.

Posted by Darrell 2005-12-19 20:00|| 2005-12-19 20:00|| Front Page Top

23:57 jules 2
23:52 jules 2
23:47 trailing wife
23:37 Bomb-a-rama
23:36 trailing wife
23:33 trailing wife
23:31 trailing wife
23:30 49 pan
23:29 Robert Crawford
23:28 trailing wife
23:27 Robert Crawford
23:26 Besoeker
23:19 trailing wife
23:18 Besoeker
23:11 Barbara Skolaut
22:58 trailing wife
22:57 Besoeker
22:54 tu3031
22:49 Besoeker
22:44 tu3031
22:43 CaziFarkus
22:39 CaziFarkus
22:37 Oldspook
22:35 Besoeker