Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 05/15/2006 View Sun 05/14/2006 View Sat 05/13/2006 View Fri 05/12/2006 View Thu 05/11/2006 View Wed 05/10/2006 View Tue 05/09/2006
1
2006-05-15 Home Front: WoT
Soldier, spy
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2006-05-15 08:04|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Hey, I resemble those remarks!

Heh.

OK - here's a correction - and this shows you how BADLY out of touch the MSM is. They list a bunch of Intelligence agencies including this one:

"the National Imagery and Mapping Agency"

Problem is that one (NIMA) hasnt existed for about a year. Its the NGA - National Geospatial-inteliigence Agency, or NGA.

A quick google would ahve been enough.

And recall the NY Times publishing a story of a wounded vet getting a "Purple Star", captioning a picture of an SFC as an "Officer".

Distrust EVERYTHING you read in the MSM about the military and intelligence of the US, they are simply ignorant and grossly derelict when it comes to reporting on those items.

Posted by Oldspook 2006-05-15 12:44||   2006-05-15 12:44|| Front Page Top

#2 Distrust EVERYTHING you read in the MSM about the military and intelligence of the US, they are simply ignorant and grossly derelict when it comes to reporting on those items.

Hell, distrust EVERYTHING you read from them (period). I forget where I first heard this, but think about the last news report you saw or heard on a topic you have some high- or expert-level knowledge of. Then think about how many mistakes you caught. Why assume it's any different for other topics?
Posted by Xbalanke 2006-05-15 14:44||   2006-05-15 14:44|| Front Page Top

#3 Maybe they don't have the background to handle "rocket science" stuff; but still ... Serving on a grand jury was eye-opening--I could compare the published news story with eyewitness accounts and marvel at the differences.

I recall one science article in the NYT online where the reporter got the facts mostly straight, but a headline writer "punched up" a line from the story and got the story backwards as a result.
Posted by James">James  2006-05-15 15:54|| http://idontknowbut.blogspot.com]">[http://idontknowbut.blogspot.com]  2006-05-15 15:54|| Front Page Top

23:54 AlmostAnonymous5839
23:27  Barbara Skolaut
23:22  Barbara Skolaut
23:14 anymouse
23:08 anymouse
22:58 Pholet Unesh4335
22:58 macofromoc
22:44 Frank G
22:38 Alaska Paul
22:35 Alaska Paul
22:30 Alaska Paul
22:25 trailing wife
22:24 Frank G
22:13 whitecollar redneck
22:09 plainslow
22:09 trailing wife
22:07 Jackal
22:04 trailing wife
21:57 Frank G
21:57 Jackal
21:55 DarthVader
21:55 trailing wife
21:53 trailing wife
21:51 RD









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com