Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 09/03/2006 View Sat 09/02/2006 View Fri 09/01/2006 View Thu 08/31/2006 View Wed 08/30/2006 View Tue 08/29/2006 View Mon 08/28/2006
1
2006-09-03 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
A Different Face of Iran
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Bobby 2006-09-03 08:10|| || Front Page|| [9 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 I guess it is 'Opinion'.

But doesn't it make you feel all warm and fuzzy?
Posted by Bobby 2006-09-03 13:53||   2006-09-03 13:53|| Front Page Top

#2 Cool and that, but unles Iranian Steet does not install mad mullahs on lamp posts soon, all the admiration would count to zippo.
Posted by twobyfour 2006-09-03 14:58||   2006-09-03 14:58|| Front Page Top

#3 So if it were not for the ogre of the Great Satan, Amahandjob, like Chavez, would be out on the street in no time.
Posted by Bobby 2006-09-03 17:55||   2006-09-03 17:55|| Front Page Top

#4 The article seeks to show what wonderful people the Iranians are. I'm sure it is true. Most of the people simply want to live life and be left alone. But this type of article is an effort by the Lilliputians to tie another string on the West. "Please don't hurt the innocent Iranians." Another excuse to do nothing.

The West must reassert the foundation of the Treaty of Westphalia which stated that actions occuring in the territory of a nation were the responsibility of that nation. The 10% of Iranians that are propagating terrorism should render the other 90% irrelavant. The 10% seeking nuclear weapons do render the other 90% irrelevant. The Israelis missed a great opportunity to demonstrate this principle on Lebanon.
Posted by SR-71 2006-09-03 19:41||   2006-09-03 19:41|| Front Page Top

#5 If it requires nukes to force regime change in Iran, it is unlikely that Teheran would be touched. Rather, Qom and the large nuke sites would be attacked, along with bases around the Strait of Hormuz. The mere threat of sponsored Kurdish, Azeri and Arab independence would force regime change, because the Arab Shiite sectors alone hold most of Iran's oil reserves. Iranian regime-changers refer to the Ayatollahs as: "Arabparasts" (Arab parasites). With Qom a pile of rubble, Persian nationalist forces would coalesce and move against Basij-Wannabe-arabs.

Pundits are saying that the President will finally define the enemy, in his Sept. 19 UN speech. Then anything is possible. I have said it before here: September could be one of America's best months ever; or worst.
Posted by Snease Shaiting3550 2006-09-03 20:02||   2006-09-03 20:02|| Front Page Top

22:13 Stupidwhiteguy
23:52 Zenster
23:49 Zenster
23:46 Zenster
23:34 Zenster
23:22 Abdominal Snowman
23:20 CrazyFool
23:13 Barbara Skolaut
23:00 tu3031
22:56 Frank G
22:54 Frank G
22:51 Whiskey Mike
22:44 Texas Redneck
22:42 Kim Jong Il
22:42 Duh!
22:38 wxjames
22:38 Texas Redneck
22:38 RD
22:32 Dave D.
22:30 RD
22:24 Frank G
22:22 Frank G
22:21 Frank G
22:20 RD









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com