Article

2006-12-21 Home Front: Culture Wars

Alan Dershowitz: Why won't Carter debate his book?

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by .com 2006-12-21 07:12|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Cause he's too old to pretend respect for the opinions of the ~~fucking kikes~~ members of the Jewish Lobby like you?

Posted by gromgoru 2006-12-21 09:45|| 2006-12-21 09:45|| Front Page Top

#2 God knows I disagree with Professor D on many an issue, but I stand with him in his condemnation of this deceitful liar and coward Jimmy Carter.

Posted by Mark Z">Mark Z 2006-12-21 11:15|| 2006-12-21 11:15|| Front Page Top

#3 Grom, that was uncalled for.

Posted by OldSpook 2006-12-21 11:53|| 2006-12-21 11:53|| Front Page Top

#4 Wow. At least now we know where Grom stands.

Unless he left off the sarcasm tags.

Posted by Rob Crawford">Rob Crawford 2006-12-21 12:10|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2006-12-21 12:10|| Front Page Top

#5 I'm sure Grom means it sarcastically. Just tryin' to show how anti-semetic Carter really is.

Posted by Intrinsicpilot 2006-12-21 13:53|| 2006-12-21 13:53|| Front Page Top

#6 "You know, I think it's a waste of my time and yours to quote professor Dershowitz. He's so obviously biased, Larry, and it's not worth my time to waste it on commenting on him."

IOW: he's a Jooooo, and that settles it.

Posted by xbalanke 2006-12-21 17:26|| 2006-12-21 17:26|| Front Page Top

#7 Grom is being sarcastic, but there is truth in humor. He's given a free pass because he is Jewish and lives in Israel. :-)

About time for that gal to call Carter and $hit in his cornflakes again like she did so well last time.

In my opinion, Carter's answer is just fluff to make the immediate situation he was in go away. He owes an answer to that question to many people, not just Dershowitz. He should have taken the opportunity to address it. If his book had any meaningful thought behind it, he should have anticipated and have been able to answer the question.

Posted by gorb 2006-12-21 18:46|| 2006-12-21 18:46|| Front Page Top

23:58 Barbara Skolaut
23:57 .com
23:55 Barbara Skolaut
23:38 Capsu 78
23:32 Mick Dundee
23:10 RD
23:08 Skidmark
23:03 Frank G
22:58 Frank G
22:57 JosephMendiola
22:57 Mick Dundee
22:55 Frank G
22:55 steven
22:46 JosephMendiola
22:45 Frank G
22:40 Sneaze Shaiting3550
22:40 JosephMendiola
22:37 JosephMendiola
22:33 Frank G
22:31 Frank G
22:30 M Twain
22:28 Sligum Whunter9034
22:25 Frank G
22:22 Frank G