Article

2007-02-27 Europe

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2007-02-27 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 One possible reason for the UN to downplay the genocide angle, is that they now know it was probably a lie.

To quote Mary Mostert at Banner of Liberty
The "official" story about Srebrenica, sold to the world by Bosnian Muslims, was that the Serbs out of the clear blue sky attacked the "UN safe haven city" of Srebrenica and massacred 8000 men and boys." Only, the actual body count was about 2500. A reported 3000 of the 8000 massacred Bosnian Muslims have since voted in Bosnian elections. I've been researching and writing about this for 10 years. It seems that the "unarmed" men in Srebrenica had actually been plundering, raiding and killing Serbs in nearby villages for years prior to the supposed "Srebrenica massacre" of 1995. In fact, by 1995, more than 100 Serb villages were destroyed and about 2000 Serbian civilians were killed.

Since Americans were getting nearly all of this story at the time from CNN, and their reporter in Bosnia was Christiane Amanpour, a Muslim, they never heard that part of the story. Before I knew she was a Muslim, I got curious as to why CNN never ONCE interviewed a Serb during the Bosnia war that I started researching. In 1996 I wrote an article titled "Ethnic Cleansing under NATO's Watchful Eye in Bosnia -- Where are the missing 150,000 Serbs?"

So, who do we believe?

Posted by Bunyip 2007-02-27 03:15|| 2007-02-27 03:15|| Front Page Top

#2 He is telling Amanpour is Muslim. It is true she was born in Iran but her father seemd close to Shah's regime so he could haave been quite cold to Islam. I notice however that her father kept his name as Muhammad at a time many people close to the Shah changed their names to Aryan names.

She married a non-Muslim (that deserves death penalty under Shariah) and her son is called Darius not Muhammad, Abdallah or similar Arabic name as favoured by Muslmims.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2007-02-27 03:46|| 2007-02-27 03:46|| Front Page Top

#3 I can't recall her husband's name, but Amanpour was married to a senior Clinton' mouthpiece. It is a fact that Muslims thrive where they have minority status. On the other hand, when Muslim states have non-Muslim minorities, mistreatment, murder, discrimination, coerced exile, etc, all follow. Google "serbianna" and you will discover that Muslims are 100% to blame for problems in the Balkans and Caucasus and Palestine and Dearbornistan and Nigeria and Ivory Coast, and...everywhere. They are born trouble makers.

Posted by Sneaze 2007-02-27 04:14|| 2007-02-27 04:14|| Front Page Top

#4 The U.N.'s highest court cleared Serbia Monday of genocide against Muslims in Bosnia's bloody war. But it said the country's former government should have stopped the 1995 slaughter of more than 7,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica and ordered Serb leaders to hand over the alleged architect of the massacre.

I suppose we shouldn't be surprised that the UN's highest court refused to say something bad about a UN member government that isn't Israel or the U.S. The UN is a trade association for ~~tyrants~~ princes, and no trade association ever talks down one of its members.

The "official" story about Srebrenica, sold to the world by Bosnian Muslims, was that the Serbs out of the clear blue sky attacked the "UN safe haven city" of Srebrenica and massacred 8000 men and boys." Only, the actual body count was about 2500.

"Only" 2500. I suppose that makes it OK, then, so long as you aren't one of the 2500. Oh, well, that's life in a UN-protected safe city, I guess.

I come away from all this with two firm conclusions:

1. People in the Balkans sure seem to spend a lot of time killing each other off.

2. I doubt the Austrians and Hungarians are up for it, but a Hapsburg Empire restoration might not be such a bad idea after all.

Posted by Mike 2007-02-27 06:06|| 2007-02-27 06:06|| Front Page Top

#5 So, who do we believe?

Muslims & UN---both groups have such a sterling record.

Posted by gromgoru 2007-02-27 06:09|| 2007-02-27 06:09|| Front Page Top

#6 The Serbs were considerably less anti-Semitic than most during the Nazi era. Maybe it's true they weren't nearly as genocidal against the Muslims in the 1990's as has been claimed.
Being that it's the UN talking, the answer can't be that killing a bunch of fighting age Muslim males was justifiable and not genocide.

Posted by Glenmore">Glenmore 2007-02-27 07:41|| 2007-02-27 07:41|| Front Page Top

#7 I think Frontline did a report on the event with actual video of the Dutch soldiers wondering whether to protect the "safe zone" or hand the muslims over. The Dutch CO called UN hierarchy and he was told not to raise arms in effect turning the muslims over.

Now, whether the muslims congregated in the "safe zone" had committed crimes I cannot say. I can say the UN lured unarmed people into a "safe zone" and then turned them over to their enemies for execution. Whether its 2, 2000 or 10000, the UN bears the scare of hardly an isolated incident which is yet another brick in what should be its burial vault.

Judging combatants is hard. Judging the UN's role in this event is not.

Posted by Lanny Ddub 2007-02-27 09:06|| 2007-02-27 09:06|| Front Page Top

23:45 Old Patriot
23:37 Shipman
23:33 Shipman
23:32 Old Patriot
23:31 Jules
23:24 Shipman
23:22 Jimmy Conway
23:21 Shipman
23:16 cajunbelle
23:16 Shipman
23:07 Old Patriot
23:05 Shipman
23:05 JosephMendiola
22:58 JosephMendiola
22:58 Frank G
22:56 Shipman
22:53 JosephMendiola
22:53 49 Pan
22:45 Anonymoose
22:37 Hank
22:36 JosephMendiola
22:30 Hank
22:22 JosephMendiola
22:00 JosephMendiola