Article

2007-06-14 India-Pakistan

Most Pakistani madrassas serving useful purpose

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2007-06-14 00:00|| || Front Page|| [7 views ] Top

#1 The Madrasas are not built for the purpose of integrating students into a modern society; they are built to indoctrinate operatives against modernity. The Heritage Foundation was snowed. Stalin did it with his "Potemkin Village" frauds.

Posted by McZoid 2007-06-14 01:27|| 2007-06-14 01:27|| Front Page Top

#2 The useful purpose is creation of an army of pliable youth the Pakistan army can use as cannon fodder.

It is estimated that there are now around 20000 madrassas in Pakistan, compared to around 137 at the time of partition (1947).

The first wave of expansion took place after the uprisings in Balochistan. It was thought that Islam would be the glue to hold the new nation apart.

The numbers really mushroomed after each battlefield defeat by India.

The Deoband school itself was created after the 1857 Indian rebellion when the last Mughal Emperor was sent into exile by the British.
The muslims reacted to their loss of political and economic power by withdrawing into the past.

Some history behind madrassas.

Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, a Muslim reformer, became quite concerned for the future of the Muslims in the Subcontinent. He was against traditional dogma and religious orthodoxy and knew that the reason for Muslim backwardness was the lack of a modern education. Thus he asked the Muslim community to get proper Western-style education, learn English and cooperate with the British in order to avert the Muslim communitys decline in political power. He found it extremely difficult to convince the Muslims, since the orthodox mullahs considered it a sin to get modern education and that too through the English language, which they considered to be the language of the infidels. He founded the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College at Aligarh in 1877 that later became the famous Aligarh Muslim University. To say that Sir Syed was the pioneer of the Muslim renaissance and was responsible for the ascent of Muslim consciousness would not be wrong. There were many other famous luminaries who supported his cause such as Altaf Hussain Hali, Maulana Shibli Nomani, Mohsin-ul-Mulk, Deputy Nazeer Ahmed, Chiragh Ali, Zakaullah and others.

Sir Syed wanted the Muslims to become enlightened and moderate. He wanted them to be more politically aware and get away from a religious doctrine that was full of dogmas, rituals and superstition. He declared that orthodox Islam had become cluttered with bidat (innovation in religion), thus leading to misconceptions and misinterpretations. He asked the Muslims to go back to the fundamental sources of Islam: the Quran and the Hadith (traditions of Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]). In a speech in Lahore in 1884, he said, "We need a modern ilm al-Kalâm (way of knowledge) by which we should either refute the doctrines of the modern sciences or show that they are in conformity with the articles of the Islamic faith." The mullahs thus passed fatwas about Sir Syed and called him a Mulhid (Atheist) and Kafir. It is pertinent to note here that Sir Syeds foray into Islamic thought paved the way for a liberal reinterpretation of Islamic political philosophy by Allama Iqbal, which would be discussed later in this series.

Sir Syed is also famous for presenting his Two Nation Theory, which to some paved the way for a Hindu-Muslim divide and was the basis of Pakistan. But in the words of Jawaharlal Nehru, Sir Syed was an ardent reformer and he wanted to reconcile modern scientific thought with religion by rationalistic interpretations and not by attacking basic belief. He was anxious to push new education. He was in no way communally separatist. Repeatedly he emphasised that religious differences should have no political and national significance. Many historians endorse Nehrus view and say that Sir Syed had no intention of a communal divide and that he only wanted to assert that since the Hindus and the Muslims were two different nations, therefore Muslims should have an autonomous homeland in the Muslim majority areas of British India to safeguard their political, cultural and social rights, within a united India. Yet it cannot be denied that it was the Two-Nation Theory as believed to be contained in Sir Syeds reformation philosophy that later laid the political basis for a separate homeland for the Muslims.

Though Sir Syeds effort was directed at making the Muslims empowered and outward looking as well as closing ranks between the Muslims and the British, his emphasis on Muslim resurgence triggered the Hindu fear that it could lead to a Muslim renaissance. So it can be said that Sir Syeds reformation by default became a cause of the accelerated Hindu effort to keep the Muslims at bay at all costs, and subsequently resulted in multiplying Hindu revivalism and speeding up their endeavour to occupy the political space afforded by the British as part of their policy of political openness, which culminated in the formation of the Indian National Congress. The other aspect of these simmering divisive currents with respect to the Muslims and the Hindus was the solidification of the school of thought of Muslim extremists, who found no logic in becoming modern and resultantly succumbing to the nexus of the British and the Hindus.

Therefore, on the one hand, there was the Sir Syedian school of thought, while on the other there was the extremist school of thought. This comprised orthodox clerics and those with a jihadi mindset. "...The waqf, being fearful of the decline of Muslim prestige, power and civilisation, led the counter Madrassa Movement which sought to establish Islamic schools where the Arabic-Persian legacy as well as Islamic sciences, faith and the way of life could be safeguarded. This was seen as the way by which Muslims in India could be revitalised...Today, there is an explosion of Madrassas inspired by the Deobandi model throughout Asia" (The Independent Madrassas of India: Dar al-Ulum, Deoband and Nadvat al-Ulama, Lucknow, David Emmanuel Singh). The madrassas clung to Muslim orthodoxy and reminisced about Muslim glory, often creating the cult of Muslim conquerors who were deemed by the Hindus as invaders and ravagers of their culture and civilisation.

The formation of the Indian National Congress in 1885 permitted the Hindus and the Muslims to bring their issues within the ambit of politics. To forge a strong Muslim political identity and to seek protection of their rights as a minority, the Muslims formed their own party, the Muslim League, in 1906. Under the leadership of Sir Aga Khan, the Simla delegation put forward the demand for separate electorates, which given the Muslim-Hindu acrimony fomented in no less measure by the extremists from both the sides, was a political demand for the legal right of the Muslims to have adequate representation in the councils. The political course to seek the Muslims emancipation and their rights as a minority within the Indian Union however, were affected among others, by the annulment of the Bengal partition, the Khilafat Movement, which led to the strengthening of fiery Muslim orators and the press inclined to adopt Muslim jingoistic discourse and subsequently feeding into the currents of communalism, and the anti-Muslim rule by the Congress ministries in the 1930s.

Posted by John Frum 2007-06-14 06:54|| 2007-06-14 06:54|| Front Page Top

#3 Note that even a "reformer" like Sir Syed was unable to accept an India where Muslim and Hindu were equal. Special treatment for Muslims was required. Reversion to "true" 7th century Islam was required.

What prompted this fear? Some say that it was guilt. The Muslims knew what their ancestors had done to the Hindus and feared retribution.
Some could simply not accept their loss of superior status.

Posted by John Frum 2007-06-14 07:10|| 2007-06-14 07:10|| Front Page Top

#4 I would suggest that Muslims are not superior in any way, and inferior in quite a few. Their actions show that they know this deep down. They can't compete in any manner in ideas, culture, knowledge, societal norms, so they try to stamp out that which shows them their inferiority

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2007-06-14 09:32|| 2007-06-14 09:32|| Front Page Top

#5 They make good aiming points.

Posted by mojo">mojo 2007-06-14 11:08|| 2007-06-14 11:08|| Front Page Top

23:56 Pappy
23:54 Frank G
23:52 Zenster
23:43 Zenster
23:38 trailing wife
23:38 Zenster
23:34 trailing wife
23:25 Red Dawg
23:24 Zenster
22:46 Zenster
22:43 borgboy2001
22:39 Shieldwolf
22:37 Mike N.
22:27 Old Patriot
22:19 Frank G
22:03 GK
22:00 Zenster
21:52 Zenster
21:44 Frank G
21:39 Pappy
21:37 Frank G
21:20 occasional observer
21:20 occasional observer
21:17 Anonymoose