Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 06/16/2008 View Sun 06/15/2008 View Sat 06/14/2008 View Fri 06/13/2008 View Thu 06/12/2008 View Wed 06/11/2008 View Tue 06/10/2008
1
2008-06-16 India-Pakistan
India's Arjun battle tank acquires growing fan club but Russian T-90 backers resist
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by john frum 2008-06-16 00:00|| || Front Page|| [8 views ]  Top

#1 Obviously, this threatens a lot of generals' payoffs from the Russians.
Posted by gromky 2008-06-16 05:14||   2008-06-16 05:14|| Front Page Top

#2 
Posted by RD">RD  2008-06-16 12:54||   2008-06-16 12:54|| Front Page Top

#3 The Arjun may or may not be a fine tank. It looks like a main battle tank and is probably what India needs. Still I think India should develop a light tank for export to Africa and the middle east. I imagine there is a huge market in areas where the tanks are more likely to be used against infantry or crowds rather than other tanks. Make money, build the arms industry and reputation and you can build your own tanks with the profits.
Posted by rjschwarz 2008-06-16 14:26||   2008-06-16 14:26|| Front Page Top

#4 I think Strategy Page had an article on the Arjun a few months back - had been under development with minimal successes for years.
Posted by Vinegar Whomort2652 2008-06-16 14:37||   2008-06-16 14:37|| Front Page Top

#5 I think it would be good idea to have no tanks whatsoever in SubSaharan Africa. Do you have any idea what Hellfires, TOWs and Javelins cost?
Even AT4s will bust your weekly beer allowance.
Posted by Richard Aubrey">Richard Aubrey  2008-06-16 15:00||   2008-06-16 15:00|| Front Page Top

#6 Still I think India should develop a light tank for export to Africa and the middle east.

A light tank will be mincemeat when it faces Pakistani and Chinese tanks and ATGMs.

India has been very reluctant to export arms. Nehru was quite the peacenik and hated armaments. At independence India had ordinance factories that manufactured all manner of defence gear. It exported almost nothing, and what little was sold went to a select few nations.

What the Indian army needs is more artillery and IFVs.
Posted by john frum 2008-06-16 15:11||   2008-06-16 15:11|| Front Page Top

#7 Tanks are assuming the usefulness of battleships.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2008-06-16 15:19||   2008-06-16 15:19|| Front Page Top

#8 Because of the increased lethality of anti-tank missiles?
Posted by john frum 2008-06-16 15:29||   2008-06-16 15:29|| Front Page Top

#9 And all the other PGM however delivered.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2008-06-16 15:34||   2008-06-16 15:34|| Front Page Top

#10 Most areas of subsahara africa would see tanks used against rioters. Rioters without anti-tank weapons in most cases. And if you do face one you have the advantage that you have a limited crew and cost compared to a main battle tank like the ones the soviets sell.

The arms race between anti-tank missiles and tanks has mostly been won in the missiles favor. I agree with that, but you can't concede the entire field because they *might* have missiles. You instead buy more disposable versions of your equipment. And of course hope you don't end up in a tank v tank war.

If not a tank than an APC which would mostly have the same negatives to anti-tank missiles.
Posted by rjschwarz 2008-06-16 16:56||   2008-06-16 16:56|| Front Page Top

#11 A technical would do just as well, and cost a lot less.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2008-06-16 18:13||   2008-06-16 18:13|| Front Page Top

#12 Personally I'd make a heavy carrier of disposable concrete slabs. That fired AT missiles.

Mix. Set. Armour up!
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2008-06-16 18:25||   2008-06-16 18:25|| Front Page Top

#13 A technical is far superior in open ground. Desert and rocky mountains. The Sahara and above where mobility is king. In a city, town, hamlet, or mud and jungle I wouldn't want to be caught dead in one. That is why you don't hear about technicals in those areas.

Of course on the expendable front they are better than a light tank or APC so perhaps it doesn't matter. Send two or three and if you lose some to a swarm its not a big loss.
Posted by rjschwarz 2008-06-16 19:15||   2008-06-16 19:15|| Front Page Top

#14 anyone who ever watched Rat Patrol knows jeeps with machine guns rule. They can beat panzers, infantry, bombers, destroyers....
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2008-06-16 19:39||   2008-06-16 19:39|| Front Page Top

#15 Yeah, Frank, but can they take UAVs with Hellfires?
Posted by Rambler in California">Rambler in California  2008-06-16 19:48||   2008-06-16 19:48|| Front Page Top

#16 ...interplanetary star cruisers...

OK, I made that last one up
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2008-06-16 20:17||   2008-06-16 20:17|| Front Page Top

#17 Yeah, Frank, but can they take UAVs with Hellfires?

You gotabe to be joking Rambler...

These guys could kick the Krap outta Krauts and any body else with ease!!

Vic Morrow was so good that any weapon he used in combat shot 250 rounds without reloading!

yep, Grease Gun, Thompson's auto, M1 Grarand, M1 carbine, .45 sidearm whatever fer Christ sake!

Vic Morrow as Sgt. "Chip" Saunders
Rick Jason as Lt. Gil Hanley
Jack Hogan as William G. Kirby
Pierre Jalbert as Caje
Dick Peabody as Littlejohn

Other Regulars:
Shecky Greene as Braddock ... Season 1
Steven Rogers as Doc ... Season 1
Conlan Carter as Doc ... Seasons 2 through 5
Tom Lowell as Billy Nelson ... Seasons 1 and 2
William Bryant as McCall ... Season

UAVs with Hellfires?

HA what are those Rambler!?! I'm surprised at youse!
Rambler you're talking about Combat PROFESSIONALS damn it!! >:
Posted by RD">RD  2008-06-16 20:52||   2008-06-16 20:52|| Front Page Top

#18 Rat Patrol waz bush league compared to Combat BTW!
Posted by RD">RD  2008-06-16 20:54||   2008-06-16 20:54|| Front Page Top

23:38 crazyhorse
23:29 trailing wife
23:08 FOTSGreg
23:00 Anonymoose
22:56 Anonymoose
22:50 JosephMendiola
22:27 JosephMendiola
22:12 JosephMendiola
21:49 JosephMendiola
21:40 Zhang Fei
21:37 JosephMendiola
21:20 Gravins Gonque4629
21:19 Frank G
21:10 trailing wife
21:07 Grusolet Sproing6197
21:06 Old Patriot
21:05 Zhang Fei
21:05 Caesar Floting6671
20:59 Zhang Fei
20:54 RD
20:52 RD
20:40 JosephMendiola
20:34 JosephMendiola
20:33 Harcourt Jush7795









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com