Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 08/27/2008 View Tue 08/26/2008 View Mon 08/25/2008 View Sun 08/24/2008 View Sat 08/23/2008 View Fri 08/22/2008 View Thu 08/21/2008
1
2008-08-27 Home Front Economy
New York Times Co. July revenue falls 10.1 percent
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2008-08-27 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 
Posted by gorb 2008-08-27 03:17||   2008-08-27 03:17|| Front Page Top

#2 Here's a hint from Zimbabwe - printing more paper won't necessarily make it more valuable.
Posted by Procopius2k 2008-08-27 08:10||   2008-08-27 08:10|| Front Page Top

#3 Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of idiots, charlatan's and bozos.
Posted by Jack is Back!">Jack is Back!  2008-08-27 09:34||   2008-08-27 09:34|| Front Page Top

#4 Gannett's was down 12%. This is an industry-wide decline due to the current economic slump. Financially-strapped companies don't have ad dollars to spend. Note that newspaper sales revenues only fell 0.5%.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2008-08-27 09:44|| http://timurileng.blogspot.com]">[http://timurileng.blogspot.com]  2008-08-27 09:44|| Front Page Top

#5 Financially-strapped companies don't have ad dollars to spend.


...wildly without any validation of effectiveness.

If O'man tanks after all the sale and buzz by the usual suspects, I expect a similar review of return on investment created by this environment for the MSM as a whole.
Posted by Procopius2k 2008-08-27 10:45||   2008-08-27 10:45|| Front Page Top

#6 When I first read this, I wasn't too concerned about the declining online ad growth.

But then I looked a LOT deeper at the data, and now I'm concerned about the long-term future of NYT and other newspaper-based online entities.

I just finished an explanatory and somewhat alarming blog post about it, with charts and graphs and such.

"Why Barack Obama and Blogs Are Killing the New York Times Online" http://is.gd/Ste

Jason Baer
Convince & Convert - Internet consulting for agencies
http://www.convinceandconvert.com
Posted by Jason Baer">Jason Baer  2008-08-27 12:28|| http://www.convinceandconvert.com]">[http://www.convinceandconvert.com]  2008-08-27 12:28|| Front Page Top

#7 Manolo! Bring me my crack pipe!
Posted by Pinchy 2008-08-27 13:21||   2008-08-27 13:21|| Front Page Top

#8 NYT deserves every dollar they Loose!
Can you imagine they still tout themselves as a Fair Rag!

And you can't tell the Editorial Section from the Newsy Side except that the Newsy Side was even more RADICAL LEFT!

from Potemkin Village, way back....
In 1931, the New York Times correspondent Walter Duranty gave us the Potemkin village, Duranty was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 1932. ...
*eeewww* *spit* *bleah*

to Whittaker Chambers "NYT does full blown denial",

the Rosenbergs "NYT does full blown denial",

Kennedy Clan especially John F.
NYT does Camelot in the Maximum Supine position and to this day remains enthralled with the Kennedy Clan.

NYT,
Cuba worship, with a full blown Homo-erotic Love Affair with Fidel Castro.
*eeewww* *spit* *bleah*

Vietnam,
NYT Does a Back Stabbing for over 10 years; CoxSuckers! They Betrayed every USA Serviceman and Servicewoman in uniform.

WaterGate:
Re-Manufactured that political Shenanigan into a Capital Crime against America.
The NYT Hate for Nixon knows no bounds, just like their opposite LOVE for the Kennedy's.

NYT hated Ronald Reagan,
and of course they hated Reagan kicking Castro out of Grenada.

And Panama, NYT didn't approve of RR dislodging that maniac Noriega..

Clarence Thomas:
actively campaigned against him.

ETC. ETC. ETC.

And "All the News ThatÂ’s Fit to Print" *SPIT*
Posted by Red Dawg">Red Dawg  2008-08-27 15:47||   2008-08-27 15:47|| Front Page Top

#9 "All the news that's fit to print"
LIKE HELL
"All the news we can twist to OUR ends" is a helluva lot more accurate.
Posted by Redneck Jim">Redneck Jim  2008-08-27 16:55||   2008-08-27 16:55|| Front Page Top

#10 Interesting post, Jason. The Taz comment as well. The thing is, the New York Times and other major newspapers have been trending strongly downward for years now such that, if I recall the numbers correctly, the value of the New York Times conglomerate some months ago had sunk to the value of the properties it holds, not even including the value of equipment. Not good, especially given the recent fall in property values accompanying the current mortgage crisis. Clearly you're much better at matters financial than I; would you be kind enough to see if my understanding is anything close to correct?
Posted by trailing wife ">trailing wife  2008-08-27 19:27||   2008-08-27 19:27|| Front Page Top

23:58 JosephMendiola
23:56 Spike Uniter
23:51 JosephMendiola
23:50 Spike Uniter
23:45 General_Comment
23:45 Slats Glans2659
23:42 General_Comment
23:41 Spike Uniter
23:37 Spike Uniter
23:30 General_Comment
23:28 Slats Glans2659
23:24 General_Comment
23:20 Spike Uniter
23:20 Swamp Blondie in the Cornfields
23:17 Swamp Blondie in the Cornfields
23:13 General_Comment
23:13 Swamp Blondie in the Cornfields
23:09 General_Comment
23:03 General_Comment
23:03 AzCat
22:59 AzCat
22:56 General_Comment
22:55 trailing wife
22:45 Spike Uniter









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com