Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 09/03/2008 View Tue 09/02/2008 View Mon 09/01/2008 View Sun 08/31/2008 View Sat 08/30/2008 View Fri 08/29/2008 View Thu 08/28/2008
1
2008-09-03 Afghanistan
Suicide bombs and checkpoints carnage: Germany in Afghanistan
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2008-09-03 01:54|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top
 File under: Taliban 

#1 but such is the deterioration of the security situation that the battle has evidently come to them

Wonder if the genius who wrote this at 'military world' ever considered the possibility that the Germans are being deliberately targeted, so they can generate the kind of response Herr Gysi and the newspapers are providing theem?
Posted by Pappy 2008-09-03 12:02||   2008-09-03 12:02|| Front Page Top

#2 "This is about supporting the soldiers, not hindering them with hypocritical moral debates."

What I wouldn't give to hear the American left say something like this.
Posted by Iblis 2008-09-03 14:21||   2008-09-03 14:21|| Front Page Top

#3 1) We need to call this a war, not a peace keeping mission

2) We need to call troops who get killed "fallen heroes", not "lost his life".

3) We need to state the purpose of the mission: It's about killing Talibans, who enabled 9/11 and gave shelter to the most vicious terrorists on earth. It's about preventing a second Islamic Khmer Rouge system, a stone age Islamism that would shelter the same terrorists again.

That'll be a start
Posted by European Conservative 2008-09-03 16:18||   2008-09-03 16:18|| Front Page Top

#4 If Chancellor Merkel did so, European Conservative, how many of your countrymen would then support their troops and the mission?
Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife  2008-09-03 17:39||   2008-09-03 17:39|| Front Page Top

#5 @trailing wife

Success has many friends. We need to succeed, and support will grow.

Support of Americans for the Iraq war also varies. Now that the surge is showing results support is growing again, isn't it?

You don't need to be popular. You need to be successful. Popularity ensues.
Posted by European Conservative 2008-09-03 17:54||   2008-09-03 17:54|| Front Page Top

#6 Thank you, European Conservative. A good answer for a country I am fond of.
Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife  2008-09-03 18:12||   2008-09-03 18:12|| Front Page Top

#7 Welcome :-)

Next year we will be having a Christian Democrat/Free Democrat coalition and we will go from there.

PS: Ignore what the Free Democrats say now. They can't handle being an oposition party, that's all.

The Social Democrats are going over the cliff flirting with the (ex?) Commies.
Posted by European Conservative 2008-09-03 19:13||   2008-09-03 19:13|| Front Page Top

#8 "Communist Party". It's a name, like George. They wouldn't do at all well if they each got only according to their needs, not their wants.
Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife  2008-09-03 19:32||   2008-09-03 19:32|| Front Page Top

23:58 Bob
23:49 tipover
23:48 Abdominal Snowman
23:38 Lonzo
23:38 Jolutch Mussolini7800
23:37 Zhang Fei
23:31 Zhang Fei
23:28 lotp
23:28 Zhang Fei
23:22 Zhang Fei
23:20 Abdominal Snowman
23:19 rjschwarz
23:18 trailing wife
23:15 Pappy
23:14 Lonzo
23:13 badanov
23:12 trailing wife
23:11 trailing wife
23:10 Abdominal Snowman
23:07 rjschwarz
23:05 rjschwarz
23:02 trailing wife
23:01 rjschwarz
23:01 Anonymoose









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com