Article

2008-10-23 India-Pakistan

Two containers with NATO supplies snatched

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2008-10-23 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top
File under: TTP

#1 add GPS bomb units to the containers that blow them up if the leave the route in Pakiwakiland.

Posted by 3dc 2008-10-23 00:18|| 2008-10-23 00:18|| Front Page Top

#2 Or just follow them.

Posted by mojo">mojo 2008-10-23 01:39|| 2008-10-23 01:39|| Front Page Top

#3 Get used to it. They'll just start putting them in warehouses in residential areas and breaking them up for continued transshipment. We're going to see more of this as Pakistan deteriorates even further. The position of the troops in Afghanistan will become precarious. We should declare victory and bring them home now, tell the Afghans if we have to come back they all die, tell the Pakis they've replaced the Norks on the terror sponsor list, and tell the Indians Pakistan is a free fire zone as far as we are concerned.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2008-10-23 07:00|| 2008-10-23 07:00|| Front Page Top

#4 we should have told India that in the first place. I'm sure we could devise a way too get our guys in afghanistan supplies other than pakistan

Posted by chris 2008-10-23 07:34|| 2008-10-23 07:34|| Front Page Top

#5 and would probably cost less (aid wise) if we just airlifted it in

Posted by chris 2008-10-23 07:35|| 2008-10-23 07:35|| Front Page Top

#6 Do you folks harbor a particular wish to see Bombay reduced to a glass-lined crater?

Posted by Mitch H.">Mitch H. 2008-10-23 08:03|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]">[http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/] 2008-10-23 08:03|| Front Page Top

#7 eventually the rogue elements will get their jands on the nukes in pakiland anyway , what do you think will happen then? Or are you saying we should continue too let pakistan just do whatever the hell they want too like shoot at our troops who may enter their land, which they have know prblem letting the taliban cross over back and forth too attack NATO forces

Posted by chris 2008-10-23 08:51|| 2008-10-23 08:51|| Front Page Top

#8 Shouldn't we have some guys with guns riding along on a caravan like that? Contractors or SOMETHING?
Are we even allowed to defend the stuff while in Wakiland?

Posted by bigjim-ky 2008-10-23 09:23|| 2008-10-23 09:23|| Front Page Top

#9 Supplying through Pakistan is untenable in the medium to long term. Afghanistan is a cesspool. Nice people, when they don't want to kill you or their islam infection is not active (redundant, I know), but they are several generations away from the modern world. I am not interested in spending blood or treasure to secure either Afghanistan or the Pak tribal belt. It will take years and years and cost the lives of thousands of our troops. I say we leave, but make it clear upon doing so that should harm come our way from here, death will come to visit them.

Posted by remoteman 2008-10-23 16:21|| 2008-10-23 16:21|| Front Page Top

#10 Sir Charles Napier is the example we should be looking to. He accomplished quite a bit, though apparently not everything needed.

Posted by Don Vito Omeling5062 2008-10-23 17:37|| 2008-10-23 17:37|| Front Page Top

23:39 European Conservative
23:31 JohnQC
23:29 Oztralian
23:26 JohnQC
23:24 Pappy
23:23 Barbara Skolaut
23:22 Barbara Skolaut
23:17 Sherry
23:16 3dc
23:05 3dc
23:04 eltoroverde
22:52 Frank G
22:50 Frank G
22:45 Frank G
22:45 3dc
22:44 Abu do you love
22:41 Thealing Borgia 122
22:39 Frank G
22:32 tipper
22:22 newc
22:21 badanov
22:19 A_Rovian_Desciple
22:14 Alaska Paul
22:12 Alaska Paul