Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 10/17/2009 View Fri 10/16/2009 View Thu 10/15/2009 View Wed 10/14/2009 View Tue 10/13/2009 View Mon 10/12/2009 View Sun 10/11/2009
1
2009-10-17 Science & Technology
Military Airship Upgrade
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2009-10-17 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top

#1 As per the proposed GLOBAL-SPACE PROMPT STRIKE concepts, the USDOD would need to also dev ADVANCED AIRSHIPS WID LANDING, LAUNCHING, + REFUELING CAPABILITIES FOR STRATEGIC ARMED UAV = UOVS oper from CONUS.

But, once again, I digress ...
Posted by JosephMendiola">JosephMendiola  2009-10-17 02:12|| NA]">[NA]  2009-10-17 02:12|| Front Page Top

#2 Though it sounds peculiar, why not mount an extremely long range sniper cannon? At the height of 5,000-15,000 feet, it could put a single round through the engine block of an advancing enemy vehicle.

There's always somebody who wants to turn recce assets into light strike. "Why don't we put a gun on it?" has been heard so many times throughout history...
Posted by gromky 2009-10-17 04:54||   2009-10-17 04:54|| Front Page Top

#3 "Why don't we put a gun on it?" has been heard so many times throughout history...

Because it works?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2009-10-17 07:03||   2009-10-17 07:03|| Front Page Top

#4 Because it rocks.
Posted by Excalibur 2009-10-17 07:06||   2009-10-17 07:06|| Front Page Top

#5 Put a recoilless.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2009-10-17 07:21||   2009-10-17 07:21|| Front Page Top

#6 p.s. Welcome back Caliburn.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2009-10-17 07:22||   2009-10-17 07:22|| Front Page Top

#7 Let me recommend if I may, LOF-6 Daimler engines and four-bladed Heine wooden propellers? Only six would be needed to fly in a Star of David formation, which at the proper altitude could monitor hundreds or possibly thousdands of kilometers. :)
Posted by Besoeker in Duitsland 2009-10-17 09:06||   2009-10-17 09:06|| Front Page Top

#8 Guns would be silly. A simple 50 ft. long cubic zirconium needle ram would be sufficient for blimp-to-blimp combat. As in all things air-force trainning and reflexes would be everthing.

Stand by to ram!
K
6 hours later

We've nearly got heeeem!

Lunch

Hell this would be a natural for the AF.
Posted by .5MT 2009-10-17 12:20||   2009-10-17 12:20|| Front Page Top

#9 Mad-Max showed the world that ANY vehicle could be better with a weapon welded on it.
Predator + AGM = Reaper
APC + 120mm Gun = Tank
Toyota + Machine Gun = Technical
biplane + sexygun = A-10
Blimp + Snipers rifle = OMGWTFBBQ
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2009-10-17 12:42||   2009-10-17 12:42|| Front Page Top

#10 Weaponizing the blimps seems like a natural. I just fear the day they begin weaponizing traffic signals.
Posted by Richard of Oregon 2009-10-17 13:01||   2009-10-17 13:01|| Front Page Top

#11 And lose the diesels, F-100s are indicated.... with strakes... lottsa strakes - and the entire thing needs to be heavily armoured in case the reds arm their blimps. That's for Block 1. For Block II no more hot bunking.
Posted by .5MT 2009-10-17 14:54||   2009-10-17 14:54|| Front Page Top

#12 A friend pointed out the obvious: put a solid state laser on board. It could instantly toast anything in line of sight.
Posted by Anonymoose 2009-10-17 20:02||   2009-10-17 20:02|| Front Page Top

23:46 gromky
23:44 gorb
23:17 Anguper Hupomosing9418
23:11 Anguper Hupomosing9418
23:04 trailing wife
22:31 Cornsilk Blondie
22:15 Pappy
22:07 Pappy
22:05 Mike Kozlowski
22:04 Skunky Glins****
22:02 Mike Kozlowski
21:56 Skunky Glins****
21:44 Alaska Paul
21:30 phil_b
20:02 Anonymoose
19:46 Procopius2k
19:46 Frank G
19:37 JohnQC
19:34 Frank G
19:33 JohnQC
19:32 eLarson
19:20 Old Patriot
19:13 Skunky Glins****
19:09 JohnQC









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com