Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 03/26/2010 View Thu 03/25/2010 View Wed 03/24/2010 View Tue 03/23/2010 View Mon 03/22/2010 View Sun 03/21/2010 View Sat 03/20/2010
1
2010-03-26 Fifth Column
Petraeus phones IDF chief to reassure him comments spun out of context
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by trailing wife on the other computer 2010-03-26 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top

#1 comments attributed to him regarding supposed Israeli intransigence were spun out of context.

.....by the administration controlled MSM!
Posted by Besoeker 2010-03-26 03:25||   2010-03-26 03:25|| Front Page Top

#2 Oh dear. Are the DoD officials to undergo a severe tongue lashing from Secretary of State Clinton, too?


must.resist.cheap.DADT.jab.

/going preemptively to my room
Posted by Frank G 2010-03-26 08:31||   2010-03-26 08:31|| Front Page Top

#3 About that original article in Foreign Policy magazine's website: Max Boot writes

Back on March 13, terrorist groupie Mark Perry — a former Arafat aide who now pals around with Hamas and Hezbollah — posted an article on Foreign Policy’s website, claiming that General David Petraeus was behind the administration’s policy of getting tough with Israel.

I tried to set the record straight, based on talking to an officer familiar with Petraeus’s thinking, that Perry’s item was a gross distortion — in fact a fraud. I noted that in Petraeus’s view, the Israeli-Palestinian peace process was only one factor among many affecting U.S. interests in the region and that Israeli settlements were far from the only, or even the main, obstacle to peace. I even suggested — again, based on inside information — that the 56-page posture statement that Central Command had submitted to Congress, which stated that the Arab-Israeli conflict “foments anti-American sentiment, due to a perception of U.S. favoritism for Israel,” was not the best indicator of his thinking. Better to look at what he actually told Congress — in a hearing he barely mentioned Israel (until prompted to do so) and never talked about settlements at all.


In other words, the original article was straight-forward propaganda, designed to cause problems between Israel and the U.S.
Posted by trailing wife on the other computer 2010-03-26 09:18||   2010-03-26 09:18|| Front Page Top

#4 In other words, the original article was straight-forward propaganda, designed to cause problems between Israel and the U.S.
Posted by trailing wife on the other computer


Yes! "Designed to cause problems for Israel" as well as discredit Petraeus. A 'win-win' for the administration. I don't know who runs Barry's psywar campaign, but it is effective.
Posted by Besoeker 2010-03-26 09:37||   2010-03-26 09:37|| Front Page Top

23:44 CrazyFool
23:39 Skidmark
23:08 Gomez Threter7450
23:03 Don Vito Uleash
22:48 Barbara Skolaut
22:46 Barbara Skolaut
22:40 Frank G
22:34 Barbara Skolaut
22:28 eLarson
22:27 49 Pan
22:27 JosephMendiola
22:25 Pappy
22:18 49 Pan
22:09 JosephMendiola
22:00 JosephMendiola
21:58 airandee
21:57 Pappy
21:53 JosephMendiola
21:47 SteveS
21:46 phil_b
21:40 lotp
21:38  abu do you love
21:30 49 Pan
21:28 49 Pan









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com