Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 05/14/2010 View Thu 05/13/2010 View Wed 05/12/2010 View Tue 05/11/2010 View Mon 05/10/2010 View Sun 05/09/2010 View Sat 05/08/2010
1
2010-05-14 Home Front: WoT
Holder Balks at Blaming Radical Islam for Terror
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Sherry 2010-05-14 12:08|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 What a FREAKIN' LOSER !!!!
Posted by armyguy 2010-05-14 13:12||   2010-05-14 13:12|| Front Page Top

#2 The video is painful to watch. This PC harness has to go. Stupid ostrich head in sand, backside presented. Terrorists have no problem at all naming their enemies and their motives. Very upfront about it.

Wouldn't it be hilarious if Holder's inability to answer a straight-forward question comes through fear that should he do so, islamists might target him?. Perhaps they have already done so.
Posted by Swanimote 2010-05-14 13:17||   2010-05-14 13:17|| Front Page Top

#3  ....islamists might target him?. Perhaps they have already done so. Posted by Swanimote

Never happen. Barry and he are thee.
Posted by Besoeker 2010-05-14 13:31||   2010-05-14 13:31|| Front Page Top

#4 Maybe he hasn't read the report yet?
Posted by tu3031 2010-05-14 13:32||   2010-05-14 13:32|| Front Page Top

#5 How is it possible that this testimony has not already led to numerous calls for his resignation or his being replaced by the Obama administration? Whether this would be successful is irrelevant. Repeated demands for his resignation should be a minimum response. This video should be used in campaigns all over the country this November.
Posted by ryuge 2010-05-14 14:36||   2010-05-14 14:36|| Front Page Top

#6 The feds have been systematically removing any reference to radical Islam and to Islamicists as the enemy for a few years now. It's endemic in DOD, among other places, and got a decorated intel officer fired from his job with the Joint Staff when he laid out the way in which terror attacks are part of the Islamicist understanding of Quranic warfare.
Posted by lotp 2010-05-14 15:18||   2010-05-14 15:18|| Front Page Top

#7 Even saying that Jihad is due to radical Islam is watering down the truth.

Normalistic understanding of Islam is that Jihad is mandatory. The question of what is the proper Jihad (when, where, against whom, methods, etc.) is debated within the world of Islam but there is no doubt that moslems are supposed to do Jihad.
Posted by lord garth 2010-05-14 15:59||   2010-05-14 15:59|| Front Page Top

#8 Geez, what a weasle. It's as if our leaders were afraid to utter the word "German" in 1942 out of fear of offending somebody.
Posted by AuburnTom 2010-05-14 17:17||   2010-05-14 17:17|| Front Page Top

#9 Perhaps Mr. Holder, being the second smartest guy on the planet after Barack, was waiting for Rep. Smith to remove the word "radical" from his blaming of "radical Islam"? Or not.
Posted by ed 2010-05-14 18:12||   2010-05-14 18:12|| Front Page Top

#10 Uber asshat. But then, I just described the entire administration.
Posted by Rex Mundi 2010-05-14 22:43||   2010-05-14 22:43|| Front Page Top

23:55 DMFD
23:42 gorb
23:41 Adriane
23:36 gorb
23:33 gorb
23:28 Secret Master
23:22 OldSpook
22:52 phil_b
22:51 JosephMendiola
22:44 JosephMendiola
22:43 Rex Mundi
22:41 Frank G
22:40 Rex Mundi
22:39 phil_b
22:39 Frank G
22:37 OldSpook
22:35 OldSpook
22:14 phil_b
22:14 Old Patriot
22:03 Free Radical
22:01 JosephMendiola
21:52 phil_b
21:46 JosephMendiola
21:40 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com