Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 09/02/2010 View Wed 09/01/2010 View Tue 08/31/2010 View Mon 08/30/2010 View Sun 08/29/2010 View Sat 08/28/2010 View Fri 08/27/2010
1
2010-09-02 India-Pakistan
Coming Nuclear Flashpoint
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Water Modem 2010-09-02 10:54|| || Front Page|| [11 views ]  Top

#1 From the cited article: Washington and its NATO allies believed their 2001 occupation of the major Afghan cities signified... an erasure of two millennia of Afghan history and religion that afforded an opportunity to start the country anew.
This is a gross exaggeration. Maybe a neo-con on cocaine believed that when high, no one else did. The occupation did put the jihadis off balance & forced them to re-group, that's about all that can be said for it. As things stand now, only the Taliban want to 'start the country anew' using their barbarian outline. The West is not interested in providing the troops and cash for the next 50 years, which would be necessary to remodel Afghanistan into something better.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2010-09-02 12:36||   2010-09-02 12:36|| Front Page Top

#2 Nuke attack?
Posted by  Anonymoose 2010-09-02 15:03||   2010-09-02 15:03|| Front Page Top

#3 The author expects me to believe he knows more than the Indian government? Now, if he said he knows more than Obama, I'd believe him. Box in those Paks and maybe they'll be a little less troublesome in Kashmir.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2010-09-02 15:21||   2010-09-02 15:21|| Front Page Top

#4 The US surged in Iraq and Afghanistan and still lost both wars, for example, and Russia is now losing its second war in the North Caucasus.

I thought this was a odd statement by Scheuer.
Posted by JohnQC 2010-09-02 16:44||   2010-09-02 16:44|| Front Page Top

#5 This would be the Michael Scheuer whose positions on the Zionist Entity have the approval of David Duke? Even Wikipedia doesn't think much of him, which as we know takes some doing.
Posted by trailing wife 2010-09-02 20:26||   2010-09-02 20:26|| Front Page Top

23:56 rammer
23:34 OldSpook
23:25 Besoeker
23:01 Frank G
22:58 Mike Ramsey
22:58 Frank G
22:56 Frank G
22:56 Water Modem
22:32 anon1
22:28 Rhodesiafever
22:11 nuevo laredo group
22:07 Rambler in Virginia
21:40 Mullah Richard
21:37 Frank G
21:35 Spatch Speaking for Boskone8774
21:27 Hupusosing Bucket8370
21:13 swksvolFF
21:10 anon1
21:05 anon1
20:57 Entertaining Prose
20:42 anon1
20:29 Frank G
20:27 Procopius2k
20:26 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com