Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 07/26/2011 View Mon 07/25/2011 View Sun 07/24/2011 View Sat 07/23/2011 View Fri 07/22/2011 View Thu 07/21/2011 View Wed 07/20/2011
1
2011-07-26 Fifth Column
45 Senators Oppose UN Gun Control Scheme In Letter To Obama-Clinton (pdf)
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2011-07-26 10:33|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 When The Hell Is America going to wake up and send these idiotic freaks packing? Everyday just another reason to vomit with all the things they pass or try to do to this country.
Posted by One Eyed Dark Lord of the Geats7832 2011-07-26 10:45||   2011-07-26 10:45|| Front Page Top

#2 45 Senators guarantees no treaty, and that would generally be the end of it. Why negotiate a treaty that that the Senate has pre-nullified for you? But this administration is above such menial things and will boldly forge ahead.
Posted by Iblis 2011-07-26 12:15||   2011-07-26 12:15|| Front Page Top

#3 I don't know/can't tell whether OEDLG etc is annoyed with the Senators or with the UN
Why not both?
Posted by Spot 2011-07-26 12:51||   2011-07-26 12:51|| Front Page Top

#4 "Why negotiate a treaty that that the Senate has pre-nullified for you?"

Kyoto comes to mind, Iblis. Perhaps AlBore or Clinton can explain why (other than that they're just idiots). I suspect it has something to do with impressing their "friends" on the far Left.
Posted by Barbara 2011-07-26 13:10||   2011-07-26 13:10|| Front Page Top

#5 More insidious than that. The way the scoundrels are writing treaties today is to do so in such a way that nations "commit before agreement", in which the leaders agree to target "goals" in their nations, before the treaty has been approved and signed.

This turns things around, by requiring majority *disapproval* of a treaty, rather than *approval* before at least parts of it are implemented.

For example, when Clinton was leaving office, he signed on to the ICC treaty, forcing Bush and the Republican controlled senate to say "Hell no!" Even before then, the Republican senate had rejected the signed Test Ban treaty.

We still have the damned Kyoto agreement over our heads, because while the senate won't confirm, it won't trash can it, at least yet.
Posted by Anonymoose 2011-07-26 13:43||   2011-07-26 13:43|| Front Page Top

#6 Article this am (Instpundit or PJ Tatler?) that 12 Dem Seanators have also signed on.
Posted by Mercutio 2011-07-26 14:07||   2011-07-26 14:07|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:55 JosephMendiola
23:37 JosephMendiola
23:16 JosephMendiola
23:14 rammer
23:03 rammer
22:57 newc
22:53 newc
22:36 newc
22:34 newc
22:25 USN, Ret.
22:17 badanov
21:45 Frank G
21:31 Pappy
21:27 Pappy
21:16 Frank G
21:09 abu do you love
20:18 JosephMendiola
20:15 Pollyandrew
20:15 Barbara
20:11 Barbara
20:06 abu do you love
19:53 JosephMendiola
19:39 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com