Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 06/11/2012 View Sun 06/10/2012 View Sat 06/09/2012 View Fri 06/08/2012 View Thu 06/07/2012 View Wed 06/06/2012 View Tue 06/05/2012
1
2012-06-11 India-Pakistan
US withdraws negotiators from Pakistan, no supply deal
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2012-06-11 11:46|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [169 views ]  Top

#1 Good. Cut off all aid $
Posted by Frank G 2012-06-11 12:34||   2012-06-11 12:34|| Front Page Top

#2 And insert Stuxnet and Flame into all their computers
Posted by Steve White 2012-06-11 14:06||   2012-06-11 14:06|| Front Page Top

#3 And insert Stuxnet and Flame into all their computers

They're not already there? Shame on us.
Posted by Glenmore 2012-06-11 14:38||   2012-06-11 14:38|| Front Page Top

#4 At last check, the new transit deal wid the CAR States was for "non-lethal goods" only, which IIUC translates into a lot of heavy US-NATO firepower + related Milwares staying behind in Pakistan until further notice.

As for the former SDN ...

* TOPIX > US - PAKISTAN SUPPLY ROUTE NEGOTIATORS ARE TAKING A BREAK [tempor hiatus], BUT ARE NOT STALLED.

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > [Pak COAS]KAYANI [bitch]SLAPS THE PENTAGON, REFUSES TO MEET [US Asst. SecDef] PETER LAVOY.

IIUC, Islamabad claim is that the Kayani-Lavoy meeting was no good for them because the Pak Army's Top Eggs, etc. are usually on formal leave-of-absence.

* DEFENCE FORUM INDIA > PAKISTAN "TRASHED" + INSULTED: KAYANI WON'T MEET WID SENIOR US OFFICIAL [Peter Lavoy].

versus

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > US SECDEF PANETTA THREATENS [strongly infers]GROUND INVASION INTO PAKISTAN, as based on his coment the US will "do whatever it takes" to protect its MilFors in Afghanistan, pre- + post-2014, from violent attacks originating from various Pak-based Militant-Terrorist "safe havens", e.g. Haqqani Network, which Islamabad doesn't appear to want do anything about???

HHHMMMM, HHMMMM, well, Syria or Pakistan, the US = US-Allies amy come head-to-head wid Pak BFF IRAN, as well Pak's other BFF CHINA???

WILL SAY IT AGAIN - A US-IRAN GROUND WAR NEED NOT NECESSARILY START IN IRAN PROPER???

* SAME > [TheNews.PK = Claim] NATO SUPPLIES BREAKTHROUGH: US TO FORMALLY APOLOGIZE FOR SALALA [ + pay US$2000.0 tariff/transit fee per Container], PAKISTAN TO REOPEN SUPPLY ROUTES.

ARTIC = US, Pakistan to launch "hot talks" on Supply Routes controversy + ultimately issue a "Joint Statement"???

* SAME > NEED TO PREVENT THE RETURN OF THE TALIBAN [to Power = Prominence] POST-2014: INDIA.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2012-06-11 23:16||   2012-06-11 23:16|| Front Page Top

23:37 AlmostAnonymous5839
23:16 JosephMendiola
23:15 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:29 trailing wife
20:13 Nimble Spemble
20:10 ansky26
20:10 Thing From Snowy Mountain
19:52 tu3031
19:48 Bright Pebbles
19:40 Barbara
19:25 tu3031
18:50 Frank G
18:31 Rambler in Virginia
18:22 Pappy
18:21 Pappy
18:17 CrazyFool
18:11 CrazyFool
18:00 Bright Pebbles
17:45 Chavins and Company8995
17:39 tu3031
17:37 Ho Chi B. Hayes7277
17:36 Ho Chi B. Hayes7277
17:34 Procopius2k
17:32 tu3031

Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
54.234.42.16


Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com