Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 06/20/2012 View Tue 06/19/2012 View Mon 06/18/2012 View Sun 06/17/2012 View Sat 06/16/2012 View Fri 06/15/2012 View Thu 06/14/2012
1
2012-06-20 Home Front: Politix
UPDATE: Holder contempt vote: Approved
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by lotp 2012-06-20 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 Breitbart showed that the left are totally thrown by their own tactics.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2012-06-20 04:03||   2012-06-20 04:03|| Front Page Top

#2 Holder's failed performance yesterday should harden the resolve of the Ovesight Committee. The ATF whistleblower was on the teevee last night discussing the internal cover up. None of this will end well.
Posted by Besoeker 2012-06-20 04:35||   2012-06-20 04:35|| Front Page Top

#3 
Posted by junkiron 2012-06-20 07:36||   2012-06-20 07:36|| Front Page Top

#4 That's quite disturbing, junkiron.
Posted by trailing wife 2012-06-20 07:42||   2012-06-20 07:42|| Front Page Top

#5 I already hold Eric Holder in ontempt
Posted by Frank G 2012-06-20 08:24||   2012-06-20 08:24|| Front Page Top

#6 John Boehner might not though Frank. Whether the whiffle-ball of a Speaker goes through with bringing it to the House floor is a toss-up at best.
Posted by Charles 2012-06-20 09:42||   2012-06-20 09:42|| Front Page Top

#7 Ah. switched on Fox to see what the Committee vote count was, and find out Executive Priviledge has been evoked on the Documents Issa requested. Wonder what dirt Holder had on Obama to get him to do that?
Posted by Charles 2012-06-20 10:13||   2012-06-20 10:13|| Front Page Top

#8 Even with no dirt, the premise of Obama is that he is infallable.
Posted by swksvolFF 2012-06-20 10:58||   2012-06-20 10:58|| Front Page Top

#9 Holder's not the only on talking out both sides of his mouth at the same time. Our Commander In Cahoots just chimed in.
Posted by Junkiron 2012-06-20 11:30||   2012-06-20 11:30|| Front Page Top

#10 Obama has invoked executive privilege over the documents. Now, if he wasn't in on it, why wouldn't he throw Holder under the bus?
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2012-06-20 11:40||   2012-06-20 11:40|| Front Page Top

#11 if he wasn't in on it, why wouldn't he throw Holder under the bus?

Because he needs Holder to win the elections: every place where Romney won by a small margin will be investigated for due to complains of electoral irregularities---and guess what will be found?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2012-06-20 14:04||   2012-06-20 14:04|| Front Page Top

#12 Boehner has scheduled a full house vote next week on Holder's contempt citation coming out of the House Oversight and Reform Committee chaired by Issa.
Posted by JohnQC 2012-06-20 16:34||   2012-06-20 16:34|| Front Page Top

#13 Interesting comments from 15 May by Larry Pratt at Gun Owners of America. Of course this is well prior to Obama's "Executive Privilege" announcement.

Klik
Posted by Besoeker 2012-06-20 16:43||   2012-06-20 16:43|| Front Page Top

#14 I watched/listen all day -- man, those Dem came loaded! Every other word, from each one of the was "previous administration".....

Even wanted to call up everyone way back to get "The Whole Story. We are voting on only part of the story. Must call up before this body, everybody, etc, etc, etc...."

Best line I heard? "Sounds like Bush is running for re-election."

Dems had to be told over and over and over, the contempt vote is about Holder not submitting the documents that he was subpoenaed to do."

They still don't understand the word subpoenaed.......
Posted by Sherry 2012-06-20 16:55||   2012-06-20 16:55|| Front Page Top

#15 Points back to potential US State involvement. I wonder how long the Hildebeast can remain overseas and out of the spotlight?

As early as October of 2009 the CIA and the DEA had sent complaints about the Fast and Furious operation through their respective chains of command, eventually making their way directly to the National Security Council (NSC) at the White House.
Klik
Posted by Besoeker 2012-06-20 16:56||   2012-06-20 16:56|| Front Page Top

#16 I thought State had to have sign off on operations in foreign countries such as F & F. My understanding is that they did not do this.
Posted by JohnQC 2012-06-20 17:27||   2012-06-20 17:27|| Front Page Top

23:50 JosephMendiola
23:26 Frank G
23:21 Frank G
23:13 DarthVader
22:54 Frank G
22:37 JosephMendiola
22:30 JosephMendiola
22:08 swksvolFF
21:40 Frank G
21:20 Zhang Fei
21:18 Rambler in Virginia
20:58 Angaiger Elmeresing8208
20:54 Angaiger Elmeresing8208
20:31 Anguper Hupomosing9418
20:25 OmuluqueHapsburg5085
20:11 Silentbrick - Schlumberger Squishy Mud Division
19:49 Dale
19:47 Matt
19:22 charger
19:16 Alaska Paul
19:15 Charles
18:32 Capsu78
18:30 Capsu78
18:13 Capsu78









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com