Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
#1 The upside is that Israel, Saudi or Pakland will nuke them first.
Posted by phil_b 2012-07-09 06:25||
#2 Walz needs to take his medicine - he's losing it. A Middle East with nuclear weapons = Next world war. Since when has any major weapon system ever been held back ... over the long term? Whatever weapons exist - are always used . The words "nuclear deterrence" can never exist in the Middle East. It's a dangerous fallacy to think that because deterrence existed for a brief time between the USA and the former Soviet Union ... that therefore the concept can be applied elsewhere.
Posted by Raider 2012-07-09 13:04||
#3 Nothing less than astounding how liberals can twist their "no nukes!" policy to "theocratic fascist state should have nukes" as long as it is to the detriment of America.
Posted by gromky 2012-07-09 15:03||
#4 We missed Iran El Supremo the Ayatollah Khamenei telling the nation to prep for the "end times" + that the focii of Iran's national policies is the return of the 12th Imam, didn't we???
KHAMENEI may be waitin' for a spell yet ...
> the Boy is not born yet.
> He hasn't joined the US Mil = elite Soldier.
> Was not converted to Islam while in the US Mil.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2012-07-09 22:21||