Article

2013-12-06 Home Front: WoT

US Says May Seek Dismantling Part Of Arak Reactor In Iran Deal

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by trailing wife 2013-12-06 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top
File under: Govt of Iran

#1 Wait a minute! I thought a deal was all done. How can we seek more stuff after the "law" is signed. Does the law mean nothing to our regime?

Oh wait, forget I just asked that......

Posted by AlanC 2013-12-06 08:10|| 2013-12-06 08:10|| Front Page Top

#2 Exactly, Alan. The deal is signed, the bargaining over. Any further concessions will only come from the Americans. Maybe we could offer to enrich their uranium for them.

Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2013-12-06 09:58|| 2013-12-06 09:58|| Front Page Top

#3 "Because, quite frankly, we're not quite sure what you need a 40-megawatt heavy water reactor - which is what Arak is - for any civilian peaceful purpose."

Looks like State didn't get a SITREP until after the agreement was signed.

Posted by Pappy 2013-12-06 10:30|| 2013-12-06 10:30|| Front Page Top

#4 Looks like State didn't get a SITREP until after the agreement was signed. Posted by Pappy

My guess is, that's what happened in Benghazi as well.

Posted by Besoeker 2013-12-06 10:45|| 2013-12-06 10:45|| Front Page Top

22:58 3dc
22:35 Beau
22:30 Beau
21:38 USN, Ret.
21:24 JosephMendiola
20:43 Alaska Paul
20:18 Nguard
20:17 JosephMendiola
20:10 Bright Pebbles
20:10 JosephMendiola
19:24 SteveS
19:19 Redneck Jim
19:17 Redneck Jim
19:15 SteveS
19:07 JosephMendiola
19:05 SteveS
19:04 SteveS
18:47 JosephMendiola
18:32 JosephMendiola
18:23 Airandee
17:42 Shipman
17:41 Shipman
17:39 Shipman
17:37 Shipman