Article

2015-10-29 Home Front: Politix

Debate crowd roars approval as Cruz unmasks sophomoric CNBC moderators

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2015-10-29 05:42|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 The entire RNC should sacked.

These 'debates' are just real life playing out the story of Lucy Van Pelt and Charlie Brown in the consistent taunting of 'I'll hold the ball this time Charlie Brown'. Time and time again. Stupid is as stupid does.

We'll give you a debate, but we provide the moderators, or no show. When you have a draw card like Trump, someone hungry for ratings will break the reservation and offer you the venue.

Posted by Procopius2k 2015-10-29 07:50|| 2015-10-29 07:50|| Front Page Top

Ms. Quick gave new meaning to the term 'arrogant and spiteful.' What a shameless display.

Posted by Besoeker 2015-10-29 08:39|| 2015-10-29 08:39|| Front Page Top

#3 It was a matter of time until Cruz, Rubio and Trump B-slapped the MSM for their bias.
Funny though, Cruz got little or no air time this morning. Must have PO'ed some big shots.
Rubio got a lot of time. He must be the current favorite of the MSM now.

Posted by jvalentour 2015-10-29 08:40|| 2015-10-29 08:40|| Front Page Top

#4 My question is why do the RNC keep letting their enemy chose the battlespace? Good way to keep losing.

At this point it is no longer by accident or being naive. They want the candidates they don't like taken out and they want their "enemies" on the left do it for them.

Posted by DarthVader 2015-10-29 10:11|| 2015-10-29 10:11|| Front Page Top

#5 I thought the debate were great. Showed up the MSM bias early in the election cycle and helped the fighters rise to the top without looking like whiners. Also being on CNBC might have encouraged more independents and liberals to tune in believing it was less biased than CNN or Fox.

I doubt that was the intent mind you, but still it was a good thing in the long run.

Posted by rjschwarz 2015-10-29 10:45|| 2015-10-29 10:45|| Front Page Top

#6 CNBC is less biased?

CNBC is a propaganda arm for the donks.

CNN is only slightly less biased than CNBC but they root for the donks. The NYT is their bible.

FOX tries to be "fair and balanced" but they are right of center which isn't the same as being a pub cheerleader.

Posted by Sven the pelter 2015-10-29 13:19|| 2015-10-29 13:19|| Front Page Top

#7 CNBC is considered to be financial more than political and I think most people assume that they are less liberal because of that. I"m not saying they are, that was made clear last night that they are just as liberal if not more so.

Posted by rjschwarz 2015-10-29 14:37|| 2015-10-29 14:37|| Front Page Top

23:59 Mystic
23:50 Ebbart Glererong5900
23:45 Alaska Paul
22:58 JosephMendiola
22:57 chris
22:56 JosephMendiola
22:52 chris
22:49 Barbara
22:46 chris
22:39 Barbara
20:47 Frank G
20:40 rjschwarz
20:39 rjschwarz
19:52 Nguard
18:40 Shipman
18:38 Shipman
18:34 Shipman
18:30 Procopius2k
18:24 Procopius2k
18:13 g(r)omgoru
17:59 SteveS
17:55 newc
17:46 Thing From Snowy Mountain
17:40 newc