Article

2016-02-02 -Short Attention Span Theater-

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by gorb 2016-02-02 13:01|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 ...to carefully investigate suspiciously overheated climate temperature book-cooking by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Don't 'investigate'; cut their budget by 10 - 20%.

Posted by Raj 2016-02-02 13:24|| 2016-02-02 13:24|| Front Page Top

#2 Unless there are actual consequences, they're not in "hot water".

Cf. Lois Lerner.

Posted by charger 2016-02-02 13:48|| 2016-02-02 13:48|| Front Page Top

#3 Raj, you're a piker. Start at 80% cut and work down from there.

I've been a Software geek for 35 years including as a systems auditor investigating the validity of models. It is a given that the easiest way to get the results you want is to cook the data.

Posted by AlanC 2016-02-02 14:18|| 2016-02-02 14:18|| Front Page Top

#4 How about this? If they want to present a model saying there's *this* amount of warming, fine. If their module proves accurate in five years, they will be listened to. If it's not, they get burned at the stake. Oh and you must all present ALL data like real scientists. No hiding anything or it's the stake.

These cretins give real scientists a bad name.

Posted by Silentbrick 2016-02-02 15:56|| 2016-02-02 15:56|| Front Page Top

23:30 JosephMendiola
23:13 JosephMendiola
22:46 gorb
22:44 gorb
22:05 Frank G
22:03 Pappy
22:00 trailing wife
21:59 badanov
21:51 JC
21:48 Pappy
21:20 Rambler in Virginia
21:02 Sven the pelter
20:40 JosephMendiola
20:35 JosephMendiola
20:30 JosephMendiola
20:19 JosephMendiola
20:10 Frank G
19:29 Knuckles Thriting7516
19:29 Thing From Snowy Mountain
19:13 Shipman
19:12 Shipman
19:11 Shipman
19:09 Shipman
19:08 Shipman