Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 03/04/2016 View Thu 03/03/2016 View Wed 03/02/2016 View Tue 03/01/2016 View Mon 02/29/2016 View Sun 02/28/2016 View Sat 02/27/2016
1
2016-03-04 Government
Chief Justice Roberts votes with the regime... again.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-03-04 07:32|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Unilateral Chief Justice, please meet unilateral POTUS. Oh, you two already know one another? Well then, let's get unilaterally busy shall we ?
Posted by Besoeker 2016-03-04 07:38||   2016-03-04 07:38|| Front Page Top

#2 Anybody now why Roberts ruled? Any statements released, opinions written? What does he say to defend or explain his actions? For the record, you know?
Posted by Bobby 2016-03-04 07:51||   2016-03-04 07:51|| Front Page Top

#3 Does Roberts "ever" vote with the people? SCOTUS justices basically have positions for life unless they get impeached. The only justice who ever got impeached was Samuel Chase but he was acquitted by the Senate.
Posted by JohnQC 2016-03-04 08:21||   2016-03-04 08:21|| Front Page Top

#4 Yep, we need a real* Republican in the White House to make sure that SCOTUS remains faithful the text of the (now ignored) Constitution by his appointments.

*real as defined by the GOPe. While GWB was a nice guy, he was a 'classical' liberal who would have just as easily fitted in with the 1950s or early 60s Donks.
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-03-04 08:30||   2016-03-04 08:30|| Front Page Top

#5 As I said before, we really need to change the way the SC is done.

Each state appoints a judge for a one year term. Vice President is the winning vote in a tie.

Keeps presidents from stacking the court and idiots like Roberts in for life.
Posted by DarthVader 2016-03-04 09:28||   2016-03-04 09:28|| Front Page Top

#6 The mercury pollution standards

Mercury is a threat to health. That is why the govt mandates it's use in household light bulbs.
Posted by SteveS 2016-03-04 10:22||   2016-03-04 10:22|| Front Page Top

#7 Temporary 'victory' until the current study is completed in April. The 'victory' for the EPA in means 45 days won't matter one way or the other - we ought to let the process play out.

link

The U.S. Supreme Court denied a request Thursday to block the EPA’s mercury-emissions rule while legal challenges proceed, handing a temporary victory to the the Obama administration and environmental groups.

Roberts’ refusal to grant a stay will allow the Obama administration to rein in toxic emissions while the EPA tabulates the rule’s cost. The agency’s review is expected to be finished in April.
Posted by Bobby 2016-03-04 13:22||   2016-03-04 13:22|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:56 Bov Flimbers
23:54 M. Murcek
23:49 Bov Flimbers
23:47 trailing wife
23:23 JosephMendiola
23:20 JosephMendiola
23:10 JosephMendiola
22:35 Blossom Unains5562
20:37 Canuckistan sniper
20:34 charger
20:07 Pappy
20:03 JosephMendiola
20:03 Pappy
20:01 JosephMendiola
19:52 JosephMendiola
19:41 Barbara
19:24 phil_b
19:15 Blossom Unains5562
18:16 Deacon Blues
17:50 gorb
17:34 Shipman
17:29 Shipman
17:23 Shipman









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com