Article

2016-03-09 Government

Loretta Lynch removes herself from Supreme Court consideration

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-03-09 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top

#1 You can one thing about Ms. Lynch

She's not stupid and she is not about to be a punching bag for the big oh.

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2016-03-09 00:02|| 2016-03-09 00:02|| Front Page Top

#2 Attorney General Loretta Lynch has told the White House she does not want to be nominated to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court.

Which might lead one to believe she was 'asked' as opposed to "suggested" by unnamed others. She's staying on for what? Does she feel a Trump administration might retain her? I doubt it.

No one in the Champ regime appears to be moving or finding new employment. Why ?

Posted by Besoeker 2016-03-09 01:25|| 2016-03-09 01:25|| Front Page Top

#3 Addition by subtraction.

Posted by Raj 2016-03-09 01:34|| 2016-03-09 01:34|| Front Page Top

#4 She took a dive looking for another Judge to force Apple to hack an iphone.

Posted by newc 2016-03-09 02:05|| 2016-03-09 02:05|| Front Page Top

#5 I think actually she is going to slow walk the Hillary investigation and is partisan in everything.
That useless B!tch

Posted by newc 2016-03-09 05:45|| 2016-03-09 05:45|| Front Page Top

#6 newc, your are correct. The only debate Lynch should be having is with Hillary about who gets the top bunk.

Posted by AlanC 2016-03-09 07:14|| 2016-03-09 07:14|| Front Page Top

#7 Lynch knows that any nomination by Obama is not going to be confirmed in the Senbate until a new President is elected (unless McConnell and the Senate Pubs cave-in which could happen. (sarc)).

Posted by JohnQC 2016-03-09 08:36|| 2016-03-09 08:36|| Front Page Top

#8 Excuse the typo "Senbate." Come to think of it, it does rhyme with reprobate.

Posted by JohnQC 2016-03-09 08:41|| 2016-03-09 08:41|| Front Page Top

#9 Doesn't wont to risk a chance of having to mess with Clintons?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-03-09 08:44|| 2016-03-09 08:44|| Front Page Top

#10 "curtail her effectiveness in her current role."

... of covering up for Obama, Hillary, Eric Holder, and other associated low-lifes.

Supreme Court Justice is a lifetime commitment and she's not ready for that - too many opportunities...

Posted by CrazyFool 2016-03-09 11:00|| 2016-03-09 11:00|| Front Page Top

#11 She said today that the Justice Department is not required to indict if the FBI recommends it. Da fix is in.

Posted by Deacon Blues 2016-03-09 16:05|| 2016-03-09 16:05|| Front Page Top

23:49 European Conservative
23:11 Canuckistan sniper
23:09 Skidmark
23:05 Skidmark
23:04 DarthVader
23:01 Skidmark
22:45 swksvolFF
22:44 Muggsy Spairt7162
22:38 Albemarle Dark Lord of the Weak8242
22:33 JosephMendiola
22:16 rjschwarz
21:58 Silentbrick
21:38 Mullah Richard
21:17 trailing wife
20:47 Iblis
20:34 CrazyFool
19:59 swksvolFF
19:56 gorb
19:50 gorb
19:46 gorb
19:44 Airandee
19:43 Grunter
19:40 trailing wife
19:37 3dc