Article

2016-08-13 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Skidmark 2016-08-13 00:00|| || Front Page|| [8 views ] Top

#1 I'm sure that, somehow, this will be discovered to be bad for global worming/climate change.

Keeping the radio waves inside the more potent ionosphere will add to the heat inside the greenhouse. On the other hand, fewer waves will leak out into space, which make a beacon to ~~extraterrestrials~~ undocumented foreign immigrants who want to come in and vote for Hillary.

Posted by Bobby 2016-08-13 07:33|| 2016-08-13 07:33|| Front Page Top

#2 Maybe it's just me,
but I think setting the atmosphere on fire is a bad idea.

Posted by Skidmark 2016-08-13 07:48|| 2016-08-13 07:48|| Front Page Top

#3 Bad for glowball warming, Bobby, but great for graft proliferation.

Posted by AlanC 2016-08-13 08:05|| 2016-08-13 08:05|| Front Page Top

#4 Doping the ionosphere with clouds of plasma to control the radio wave reflection properties may seem silly at first (maybe it is). But what happens in a peer-vs-peer conflict when the orbiting satellites get turned into clouds of fragments?

Posted by magpie 2016-08-13 18:46|| 2016-08-13 18:46|| Front Page Top

#5 If it helps ours, it helps theirs also.

Posted by Blossom Unains5562 2016-08-13 18:51|| 2016-08-13 18:51|| Front Page Top

23:26 3dc
22:50 Bov Flimbers
21:18 Bov Flimbers
21:08 Sgt.D.T.
20:52 M. Murcek
20:47 Bov Flimbers
20:41 Bov Flimbers
20:32 badanov
19:48 Angie Schultz
19:40 Frank G on the road
19:39 Frank G on the road
19:33 Frank G on the road
19:33 Mike Kozlowski
19:32 Frank G on the road
19:31 JohnQC
19:30 JohnQC
19:25 Barbara
18:51 Blossom Unains5562
18:46 magpie
18:35 Thing From Snowy Mountain
18:33 M. Murcek
17:53 Besoeker
17:51 Bov Flimbers
17:43 Bov Flimbers