Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 09/19/2016 View Sun 09/18/2016 View Sat 09/17/2016 View Fri 09/16/2016 View Thu 09/15/2016 View Wed 09/14/2016 View Tue 09/13/2016
1
2016-09-19 Economy
Harvard: Democratic Control is the Reason for the Sluggish US Economy
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-09-19 01:46|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 "The federal government has made no meaningful progress on the critical policy steps to restore U.S. competitiveness in the last decade or more,"

Just the opposite with decrees and regulations that destroy industry and add costs.
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-09-19 06:45||   2016-09-19 06:45|| Front Page Top

#2 Federal 'Rules and Regulations' were not intended to accomplish solutions, but rather to establish control.

The 'irredeemable deplorables' are incapable of functioning without strict measures of control. I was certain everyone knew that.

[sarc off]
Posted by Besoeker 2016-09-19 06:53||   2016-09-19 06:53|| Front Page Top

#3 "The federal government has made no meaningful progress on the critical policy steps to restore U.S. competitiveness in the last decade or more." That's not a fluke, that's the plan.
Posted by JohnQC 2016-09-19 08:35||   2016-09-19 08:35|| Front Page Top

#4 Our oligarchs got theirs. The rest of us just don't matter.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2016-09-19 12:20||   2016-09-19 12:20|| Front Page Top

#5 Or, quoting James Kunstler today:
The rackets and swindles unleashed in our futile quest to keep up appearances have disabled the financial operating system that the regime depends on. It’s all an illusion sustained by accounting fraud to conceal promises that won’t be kept. All the mighty efforts of central bank authorities to borrow “wealth” from the future in the form of “money” — to “paper over” the absence of growth — will not conceal the impossibility of paying that borrowed money back. The future’s revenge for these empty promises will be the disclosure that the supposed wealth is not really there — especially as represented in currencies, stock shares, bonds, and other ephemeral “instruments” designed to be storage vehicles for wealth. The stocks are not worth what they pretend. The bonds will never be paid off. The currencies will not store value. How did this happen? Slowly, then all at once.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2016-09-19 12:29||   2016-09-19 12:29|| Front Page Top

#6  ...and political polarization has increased dramatically.

This is because of the rise of the political Left; it started during Clinton's presidency and went warp factor 8 during Obama's tenure.

This study just shows it is time for things to change.

Fuck this fucking talk about fucking 'change' - how about 'improvement' and shit like that? You know, positive things?

For the past decade, the Democrats have had control and consistently have block proposals that would encourage economic growth and competitiveness.

It's been a lot longer than that, dickheads.

...and to simplify and streamline regulation.

Hell no - get rid of some, or a lot, of it, first and foremost is Obamacare. Oh - and get people off welfare and into full-time jobs.
Posted by Raj 2016-09-19 12:33||   2016-09-19 12:33|| Front Page Top

#7 Expect the Harvard Business School to soon be audited and they will lose multiple grants.

Can't have people going off the reservation and thinking and stating non approved topics.
Posted by DarthVader 2016-09-19 12:35||   2016-09-19 12:35|| Front Page Top

#8 This is because of the rise of the political Left;
True Raj but I think you're off on the date by about 100 years. The rise of the left started with Woodrow Wilson and became entrenched with FDR. It grew slowly after that. There were the policies of LBJ then the total conversion of the Demos with the likes of "Clean Gene" McCarthy and George McGovern completed the cleansing of any moderate or conservatives from the party.

Jimmuh made it worse and then Clinton put it on steroids.
Posted by AlanC 2016-09-19 12:46||   2016-09-19 12:46|| Front Page Top

#9 "The weak recovery reflects the erosion of competitiveness"

In an era when the public sector is four times larger than it was two generations ago and the average public employee makes more than the average private one (30% more in CA) it has nothing to do with competitiveness.

The weak recovery is a purposeful thing done by the Democrats who want to keep the private sector weak and the public strong because they can then bribe public employees with large salaries for easy anxiety-free jobs in exchange for undying loyalty at the voting booth.

If the private economy were to recover and become robust, people would leave public employment and vote against big government. The Dems aren't about to let that happen.
Posted by no mo uro 2016-09-19 16:10||   2016-09-19 16:10|| Front Page Top

#10 Wow. Impressed, sort of. Blind squirrel and all that jazz.
Posted by Whiskey Mike 2016-09-19 19:15||   2016-09-19 19:15|| Front Page Top

23:54 Crusader
23:43 Crusader
23:41 Crusader
23:34 Crusader
23:28 Crusader
23:23 Procopius2k
23:21 Crusader
23:12 Crusader
23:02 Crusader
22:59 Crusader
22:58 Bangkok Billy
22:53 Crusader
22:51 Crusader
22:47 Crusader
22:41 Crusader
22:39 Crusader
22:33 Crusader
22:27 Crusader
22:25 Crusader
22:21 Crusader
22:19 Crusader
22:11 james
22:01 chris
21:48 james









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com