Article

2016-10-12 Home Front: Politix

REPORT: Phone cameras banned at debate to avoid ‘inspiring Hillary's seizure disorder'

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Blossom Unains5562 2016-10-12 00:00|| || Front Page|| [7 views ] Top

#1 Anything to drag her dying carcass over the line...

Posted by Raj 2016-10-12 02:11|| 2016-10-12 02:11|| Front Page Top

Little wonder, following this disastrous video.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-10-12 03:44|| 2016-10-12 03:44|| Front Page Top

#3 The Progressives are checking off the boxes with each election: black (2008, 2012 check), womyn (2016, check), gay (check, already got that one)

Posted by JohnQC 2016-10-12 06:52|| 2016-10-12 06:52|| Front Page Top

#4 Forgot the most important one: public employee/welfare recipient, JQC.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-10-12 07:37|| 2016-10-12 07:37|| Front Page Top

#5 Please re-check the listing at #3. "Public employee/welfare recipients" were implied, as opposed to specified.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-10-12 07:40|| 2016-10-12 07:40|| Front Page Top

#6 I don't see it.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-10-12 07:42|| 2016-10-12 07:42|| Front Page Top

#7 Thx Besoeker. Oversight on my part. Should have specified.

Posted by JohnQC 2016-10-12 07:57|| 2016-10-12 07:57|| Front Page Top

#8 No problem John. Not to harsh g(r)om, but perhaps those that 'don't see it' have the luxury of not having lived it.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-10-12 08:03|| 2016-10-12 08:03|| Front Page Top

#9 During the 2nd debate, Hillary looked on the verge of flipping out without the phone cameras. She appeared rattled. She has never had to deal with someone like Trump--she was hoping for the usual p*$sy boys to show up this election. P*$sy is used as a modifier here, not a noun.

Posted by JohnQC 2016-10-12 08:31|| 2016-10-12 08:31|| Front Page Top

#10 black, womyn, gay are all public employees/welfare recipients? Not to be too harsh here, but something bothers me about this Besoeker.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-10-12 09:28|| 2016-10-12 09:28|| Front Page Top

#11 A clear case of King Kong syndrome if I ever saw one.

Posted by Pliny Glons2836 2016-10-12 09:53|| 2016-10-12 09:53|| Front Page Top

#12 black, womyn, gay are all public employees/welfare recipients?

I read that as an additional characteristic of the present and would-be next presidents, g(r)omgoru, not a general description of those sets of the population. Certainly gay men as a group have a much higher income range than the general public, and do not cluster in governemnt employment.

Posted by trailing wife 2016-10-12 10:20|| 2016-10-12 10:20|| Front Page Top

#13 I read it as who votes for 'em.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-10-12 10:29|| 2016-10-12 10:29|| Front Page Top

#14 I wonder if we can get a strobe light in...

Posted by DarthVader 2016-10-12 10:47|| 2016-10-12 10:47|| Front Page Top

#15 The 'redeye fix' is basically a strobe to dilate the pupil.

Also, disposable cameras cannot take video. A frame can be explained; video tells the story.

Posted by swksvolFF 2016-10-12 11:09|| 2016-10-12 11:09|| Front Page Top

#16 The disaster is going to happen, we gotta mitigate down ticket and wait for the implosion after the election. I don't think Bill is up to being Mr. Stand in. We will see. Crap I wish I could live to be a hundred and read about the next 8 years, it's going to be hilarious, ugly and existentialy dangerous.

Posted by Shipman 2016-10-12 11:17|| 2016-10-12 11:17|| Front Page Top

#17 #3 The Progressives are checking off the boxes with each election: black (2008, 2012 check), womyn (2016, check), gay (check, already got that one)

I only meant that the left is enamored with electing a POTUS who is from one of their usually constituent groups which they deem politically correct. We got Obama in 2008 and 2012 because a great number of people thought that would be "cool." They want to elect a womyn because we have not yet had a woman and it is time for a woman. Next a gay POTUS but then I thought well, maybe we've already got one. Same with welfare recipient, Muslim, etc. In their minds, no white men are allowed anymore.

Posted by JohnQC 2016-10-12 16:05|| 2016-10-12 16:05|| Front Page Top

#18 Crap I wish I could live to be a hundred and read about the next 8 years, it's going to be hilarious, ugly and existentialy dangerous.

I think Shipman is correct about the existential dangers of the next 8 years. If Hillary wins, she will be crippled as the result of the run up to the election and all the criminal crap and incessant lying she has engaged in--she will be all-the-more dangerous to her enemies (here and abroad). We have already seen what is like weaponizing the government against citizens under an Obama regime. The IRS goes after enemies and the DOJ presents roadblocks to justice. She will have trouble governing. Trump, if elected, will likely be fighting internal struggles with RINOS should which will make it hard for him to govern.

Posted by JohnQC 2016-10-12 16:17|| 2016-10-12 16:17|| Front Page Top

#19 Trump, if elected, will likely be fighting internal struggles with RINOS should which will make it hard for him to govern.

Therefore all the libertarians should vote for him!

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-10-12 16:20|| 2016-10-12 16:20|| Front Page Top

#20 If you have some time to waste.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/hillaryshealth

Some amusing stuff.

Posted by phil_b 2016-10-12 17:14|| 2016-10-12 17:14|| Front Page Top

22:52 USN, Ret.
22:30 Raj
21:39 KBK
21:15 Frank G
21:14 Frank G
21:10 Frank G
20:24 trailing wife
20:19 trailing wife
20:05 swksvolFF
19:59 swksvolFF
19:49 Blossom Unains5562
19:44 Iblis
19:37 Blossom Unains5562
19:30 Pappy
19:23 Pappy
19:06 Pappy
19:06 Zenobia Floger6220
18:43 swksvolFF
18:39 Zenobia Floger6220
18:10 Shipman
18:07 phil_b
18:03 phil_b
18:02 swksvolFF
17:57 DarthVader