Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 10/15/2016 View Fri 10/14/2016 View Thu 10/13/2016 View Wed 10/12/2016 View Tue 10/11/2016 View Mon 10/10/2016 View Sun 10/09/2016
1
2016-10-15 Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Trump's refusal to accept intelligence briefing on Russia stuns experts
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-10-15 07:22|| || Front Page|| [9 views ]  Top

#1 Interesting assessment General Hayden. Would you care to comment on President Obama's interest in the 'President's Daily Breifing (PBD)' conducted by the CIA?

Has President Obama's attention to the PDB "changed" since he came into office? Feedback from the CIA is rather lacking in this regard. Enlighten us if you would.

..."or perhaps [Trump} doesn't understand the nonpartisan traditions and approach of intelligence professional."

Please sir, let me give you a quick mental image of DNI Jim Clapper, testifying before congress. Would the response to tragic events in Benghazi shed any light on the "nonpartisan traditions and approach of intelligence professionals ?"

Enuf said ?

Posted by Besoeker 2016-10-15 07:40||   2016-10-15 07:40|| Front Page Top

#2 Didn't Hayden suggest giving Trump phony intelligence reports a few months ago?
Posted by Airandee 2016-10-15 07:43||   2016-10-15 07:43|| Front Page Top

#3 Russia stole files from the DNC?

Trump doesn't accept the advice of the intelligence agencies? That's the friggin story? C'mon, give me a break.

The story is what is contained in those DNC files--however they were obtained. The files show the collusion between the press, government, and Hillary's campaign to rig the election against Sanders as well as the Pubs. Why the hell would one believe anything coming from the Federal government at this point in time? Thought Hayden was a Hillary supporter.
Posted by JohnQC 2016-10-15 08:14||   2016-10-15 08:14|| Front Page Top

#4 They are really scraping the bottom of the scandal barrel, aren't they?
Posted by DarthVader 2016-10-15 09:18||   2016-10-15 09:18|| Front Page Top

#5 ...sort of like putting up flak to make the bombers blink on the way into target.
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-10-15 09:26||   2016-10-15 09:26|| Front Page Top

#6 Aren't those intelligence briefings politically tainted to tell the administration what it wants to hear as opposed to reality?
Posted by CrazyFool 2016-10-15 10:23||   2016-10-15 10:23|| Front Page Top

#7 They's probably tell Trump the truth to set him up when they deny it all and go with the desired narrative from the regime.
Posted by AlanC 2016-10-15 10:26||   2016-10-15 10:26|| Front Page Top

#8 #4 They are really scraping the bottom of the scandal barrel, aren't they?

They are doing A-B testing to see what works. Said another way, it's throwing mud on a wall to see what sticks.

Also, I would like to nominate "the nonpartisan traditions and approach of intelligence professionals" as Snark of the Day.
Posted by SteveS 2016-10-15 10:44||   2016-10-15 10:44|| Front Page Top

#9 They are not scraping the bottom, they win if they get the opposition to despair.
Posted by swksvolFF 2016-10-15 11:04||   2016-10-15 11:04|| Front Page Top

#10 Well said SteveS.
Posted by swksvolFF 2016-10-15 11:05||   2016-10-15 11:05|| Front Page Top

#11 After what the CIA pulled on Bush, why would you want to listen to these 'experts'? Then there was the 9/11 failure to consider. 'Experts'?
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-10-15 12:36||   2016-10-15 12:36|| Front Page Top

#12 Also, I would like to nominate "the nonpartisan traditions and approach of intelligence professionals" as Snark of the Day.
Posted by SteveS


Ditto SteveS. I had to read it two or three times before I could believe it. The graphic is from Powell's 5 Feb 2003 'WMD Trailor' presentation at the UN. That's Director Tenet seated directly behind Powell. I'm not faulting Powell, he didn't prepare the PPT's. My point is, the Klingons knew full well the trailers had nothing to do with WMD.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-10-15 13:31||   2016-10-15 13:31|| Front Page Top

#13 Maybe refusing falsified intelligence reports to avoid WW3? He' seen the Wag the Dog movie before....
Posted by One Eyed Speaking for Boskone7919 2016-10-15 17:33||   2016-10-15 17:33|| Front Page Top

21:49 newc
21:31 Rob Crawford
21:06 Dino Gravising9931
20:59 gorb
19:08 Frank G
18:37 swksvolFF
18:33 Zenobia Floger6220
18:14 Zenobia Floger6220
18:08 European Conservative
17:59 Zhang Fei
17:59 g(r)omgoru
17:55 DarthVader
17:54 DarthVader
17:48 gorb
17:33 One Eyed Speaking for Boskone7919
17:33 phil_b
17:13 European Conservative
17:09 g(r)omgoru
16:54 The peanut gallery
16:52 The peanut gallery
16:40 Shipman
16:23 European Conservative
16:17 trailing wife
16:16 Shipman









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com