Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 10/20/2016 View Wed 10/19/2016 View Tue 10/18/2016 View Mon 10/17/2016 View Sun 10/16/2016 View Sat 10/15/2016 View Fri 10/14/2016
1
2016-10-20 Home Front: Politix
Pentagon: Hillary Clinton Should Be Arrested For Leaking Top Secret Nuclear Intelligence on National TV
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Vast Right Wing Conspiracy 2016-10-20 08:53|| || Front Page|| [10 views ]  Top

#1 the info Hil gave out may be TS/SAP but she'll probably say she 'didn't mean to give out the info' and also that other countries probably have a good guess about this

That will be good enough for Comey
Posted by lord garth 2016-10-20 09:21||   2016-10-20 09:21|| Front Page Top

#2 Intent. The old Cheech n Chong Trippin in Court routine: "Your Honor, my client merely found these drugs, and was on his way to turn them in to the proper authorities..."
Posted by M. Murcek 2016-10-20 11:02||   2016-10-20 11:02|| Front Page Top

#3 If she trafficked in Special Access Progam (SAP) materials, was she 'read-on' to those programs? Were any of her staff 'read-on' to the programs? Such lists are maintained by SAP Managers. Are any of the those names (read-on dates/read-off dates/administrative read-off) found on the access rosters ?

If NOT, then this too is a violation of regulations and the law.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-10-20 11:07||   2016-10-20 11:07|| Front Page Top

#4 Above should read 'administrative read-off'...
Posted by Besoeker 2016-10-20 11:08||   2016-10-20 11:08|| Front Page Top

#5 Yeah, thought that was a bit off.
Posted by swksvolFF 2016-10-20 12:00||   2016-10-20 12:00|| Front Page Top

#6 This one blunder proves she is completely unfit to command.

But she will get another pass and if she wins will blunder us into a war. Either nuclear or civil.
Posted by DarthVader 2016-10-20 12:47||   2016-10-20 12:47|| Front Page Top

#7 Or?
Posted by swksvolFF 2016-10-20 13:02||   2016-10-20 13:02|| Front Page Top

#8 if she wins will blunder us into a war. Either nuclear or civil.

I'm sure she can manage both at the same time.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-10-20 13:58||   2016-10-20 13:58|| Front Page Top

#9 Unbelievable, nothing seems to be capable of stopping our presumptive Imperial Empress. Every check planned in the Constitution was based on the integrity and courage of the other branches of government to hold each other accountable. That presumption now fails since fear, retribution, and success now depend on the largess of the Rulers. That Executive Orders now carry the full force of law apparently, and Congress has no ability to restrain the spending or impeach miscreants, we are entering the brief Imperial era of America before she fails. Look for more bread and circus distractions as the last pillage of public treasuries ends with failed currency inflation in the not distant future...not a happy few weeks as we anticipate the ugly, ugly mess that follows the November ballot. In the off chance Trump pulls this out, it will still be a gigantic sh*t storm....
Posted by NoMoreBS 2016-10-20 13:59||   2016-10-20 13:59|| Front Page Top

#10 Fellow Burgers,

I've been dealing with this one all day...and as much as it pains me to say it, Malificent has done no wrong here. The 'four minutes' has been known publicly since the early 80s at least - a very good documentary done at the time (IIRC by ABC, and it was done with the cooperation of the USAF and Strategic Air Command) stated it plainly, and it has been in open-source documents before and since. It was a commonly known detail when I was in SAC and throughout the rest of my 20 years in the USAF.

Malificent has a great many things to answer for, but the bottom line is this isn't one of them.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2016-10-20 17:24||   2016-10-20 17:24|| Front Page Top

#11 @#10: Sorry Mike, but anyone who, as implied, got out of SAC without either retiring or otherwise taking "permanent leave" is either a magician or someone whose veracity must be questioned. ;)
Posted by Blossom Unains5562 2016-10-20 19:53||   2016-10-20 19:53|| Front Page Top

#12 @#10: Sorry Mike, but anyone who, as implied, got out of SAC without either retiring or otherwise taking "permanent leave" is either a magician or someone whose veracity must be questioned. ;)

Blossom,

Lord knows I tried to stay, but the commanding officer, 8 TFW, requested my presence after 6 years with the Armored Hand. :)

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2016-10-20 20:13||   2016-10-20 20:13|| Front Page Top

22:06 anon1
21:59 anon1
20:35 Pappy
20:33 Pappy
20:29 Frank G
20:27 Pappy
20:13 Mike Kozlowski
20:01 Blossom Unains5562
19:53 Blossom Unains5562
18:34 Silentbrick
17:42 JHH
17:42 Rex Mundi
17:24 Mike Kozlowski
17:12 European Conservative
17:06 Mike Kozlowski
16:51 Rambler in Virginia
16:44 3dc
16:14 swksvolFF
16:07 CrazyFool
15:39 regular joe
15:28 swksvolFF
15:16 swksvolFF
15:02 swksvolFF
14:48 rjschwarz









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com