Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 09/04/2017 View Sun 09/03/2017 View Sat 09/02/2017 View Fri 09/01/2017 View Thu 08/31/2017 View Wed 08/30/2017 View Tue 08/29/2017
1
2017-09-04 Government
President Trump Lands His Biggest Judicial Appointment Since Gorsuch
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2017-09-04 01:15|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 The left has worked diligently through judicial fiat for literally decades to re-shape the country into the classic Soviet model. This is an absolute OUTRAGE !
Posted by Besoeker 2017-09-04 07:27||   2017-09-04 07:27|| Front Page Top

#2 Senators exercise a veto over appointments within their states. One of those 'ancient' practices of the old boy club.
Posted by Procopius2k 2017-09-04 08:08||   2017-09-04 08:08|| Front Page Top

#3 ...There's also a school of thought that suspects Judge Posner wanted really bad to be one of the Supremes, and knows now he ain't gonna get it.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2017-09-04 08:58||   2017-09-04 08:58|| Front Page Top

#4 '...conform judicial rulings to the social, political, and economic arrangements of the times.' Any fad will due just as long as it doesn't involve actual Law of course.
Posted by Cesare 2017-09-04 09:30||   2017-09-04 09:30|| Front Page Top

#5 “I don’t know what ‘existing law’ means except views currently held by many judges, lawyers, and politicians,” he wrote for Slate in August. “Those views are likely to be fluid, changeable — in accordance with new social needs, attitudes, and authority. Law means one thing to conservatives, another to liberals. It has no fixity.”

One could argue that if the law is considered fluid, then you have no legal benchmarks or in a couple of words "no law."
Posted by JohnQC 2017-09-04 10:25||   2017-09-04 10:25|| Front Page Top

#6 In short - he wasn't a 'Judge'. He was a 'Lord'.
Posted by CrazyFool 2017-09-04 11:21||   2017-09-04 11:21|| Front Page Top

#7 Just imagine if the judge goes back into private practice.

Client: "So, your judgeness, under this here contract can I stop shipping to my deadbeat customer?"

Posner: "That depends on the social, political and economic arrangements of the times. Your contract has no fixity. My fee will be $50,000 for that advice."

Client: "Sorry, judge, but our fee agreement has no fixity, and them there social whatever changed just about five minutes ago. You owe me $50,000."
Posted by Matt 2017-09-04 13:35||   2017-09-04 13:35|| Front Page Top

21:19 Richard Aubrey
20:43 3dc
20:38 3dc
20:37 3dc
20:35 3dc
20:19 Mullah Richard
20:03 phil_b
20:02 Regular joe
19:58 Regular joe
19:01 Besoeker
18:48 Barbara
18:31 Besoeker
18:29 Besoeker
18:13 Frank G
17:23 3dc
17:10 Frank G
17:08 AlanC
17:07 Frank G
17:07 Threatch Jeamp8135
16:16 Elmerert Hupens2660
16:08 Elmerert Hupens2660
15:54 magpie
15:49 Bobby
15:46 Alaska Paul









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com