Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 09/05/2017 View Mon 09/04/2017 View Sun 09/03/2017 View Sat 09/02/2017 View Fri 09/01/2017 View Thu 08/31/2017 View Wed 08/30/2017
1
2017-09-05 China-Japan-Koreas
If North Korea Has Nuclear ICBM, China WILL Invade by 9/11
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anomalous Sources 2017-09-05 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top
 File under: Commies 

#1 It a prediction only a week away. Florida hurricane should have or attention on the 11'th
Posted by 3dc 2017-09-05 00:18||   2017-09-05 00:18|| Front Page Top

#2 I'm sorry but I don't believe a word of the idea of China invading North Korea. I think you can wipe your ass on your wishful thinking. Its demeaning to even hear it stated. The Clintons sold us out years ago with their "deals" with the Norks. And the US may be prudent but the fact is the US is weak and can't get it up and the American people are weak and won't back a war for ANY reason. The American people are punks ,obese, on drugs and skate boarding.
America doesn't have the balls to fight a war, plus there isn't enough human grit to last ten minutes with the quality of youth and their fat moms and dads chugging beer and eating cheats to back out and bugger off.

The Chinese are going to rescue us from Kim ? Bend over and let the wind give your breezy balls a thrill.

And the reason the US hasn't shot down the Nork missiles is we don't have the technical reach or the capability . And the reason we have to tolerate Kim is the simple fact that the old saw about winning a land war in Asia...is true. We won't attack NKorea because we can't win.
And the Chinese are NOT going ro lift a finger...that are going to watch us sweat and grin.
Posted by Whusolet B. Hayes3773 2017-09-05 04:29||   2017-09-05 04:29|| Front Page Top

#3 re ^:

Posted by Chuckles Bumble8806 2017-09-05 09:19||   2017-09-05 09:19|| Front Page Top

#4 My guess is the Chinese would be afraid of being embarrassed.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2017-09-05 10:56||   2017-09-05 10:56|| Front Page Top

#5 There are so many things wrong with this article.

1) You should always be leery of any sight that calls itself TruNews, true news, or anything like that.
2) Just because someone is from the CIA, DIA, or NSA doesn't mean that person is sane, or even close to it.
3)Are we sure they have an H-bomb? The Nokors have said they do, but as this graph shows, the explosion is well within fission capabilities.
4)Fitting any kind of bomb onto a missle is much more difficult than fitting it onto an airplane or having a static test.
5)The "best case" wargame scenarios still leave SKOR with 80,000 civilian dead and the northern 10% of S Korea devastated. The best case assumes NOKOR doesn't use nuclear weapons.
6)The Chinese are not going to invade North Korea. That would be doing our dirty work and them paying the cost. They want us to do their dirty work and us pay the cost.
7)Be careful what you wish for. Any Chinese invasion will be accompanied by an extension of a Chinese nuclear umbrella over N Korea.

Al
Posted by Frozen Al 2017-09-05 13:38||   2017-09-05 13:38|| Front Page Top

#6 Ah'm thinking that's a stuffed Trigger, Chuckles.
Posted by Skidmark 2017-09-05 14:49||   2017-09-05 14:49|| Front Page Top

#7 Is there any sourcing on that claim that half of the Tomahawks were downed?
Posted by Laurence  2017-09-05 15:08||   2017-09-05 15:08|| Front Page Top

#8 The Tomahawks are in fact going though life cycle extension rework and improvement at Raytheon.
How many at once? Not a clue, but I would hope they sent the downchecks first.
Posted by ed in texas 2017-09-05 18:26||   2017-09-05 18:26|| Front Page Top

#9 Need a Trigger warning.
Posted by swksvolFF 2017-09-05 18:26||   2017-09-05 18:26|| Front Page Top

#10 but the fact is the US is weak and can't get it up and the American people are weak and won't back a war for ANY reason.

Trying a new nym with your new writing style , Hemingway? Except you still ring changes on the despicable, deplorable Americans, and it isn't any less boring than your previous efforts.
Posted by trailing wife 2017-09-05 20:47||   2017-09-05 20:47|| Front Page Top

#11 Wonder if the Hawks are getting the same remods the Sats did last year.
Posted by Skidmark 2017-09-05 22:53||   2017-09-05 22:53|| Front Page Top

23:33 3dc
22:59 Skidmark
22:56 Skidmark
22:54 M. Murcek
22:53 Skidmark
21:50 SteveS
21:40 Frank G
21:11 trailing wife
21:05 trailing wife
21:01 Seeking cure for ignorance
20:47 trailing wife
20:41 trailing wife
19:14 Cheaderhead
19:01 charger
18:33 rjschwarz
18:31 rjschwarz
18:30 rjschwarz
18:26 swksvolFF
18:26 ed in texas
18:21 ed in texas
18:18 swksvolFF
18:16 ed in texas
18:15 ed in texas
17:43 DooDahMan









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com