Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 05/04/2024 View Fri 05/03/2024 View Thu 05/02/2024 View Wed 05/01/2024 View Tue 04/30/2024 View Mon 04/29/2024 View Sun 04/28/2024
2007-07-05 Home Front: WoT
When does a massacare count as news?
Confederate Yankee

I just sent the following to Associated Press Director of Media Relations Jack Stokes and the Associated Press Board of Directors.

When does a massacre matter?

I ask this question, because on Thursday, June 28, The Associated Press—and to a lesser extent, Reuters, and a small independent Iraqi news agency—ran stories claiming that 20 decapitated bodies had been found on or near the banks of the Tigris River in Um al-Abeed, a village near Salman Pak, southeast of Baghdad, with sectarian violence strongly implicated. . . .

This claimed massacre never happened, and was formally repudiated by the U.S. military on Saturday, June 30, who ascribed the claims to insurgent propaganda. To date, the Associated Press has refused to print a retraction or a correction for this false story, just as it has failed to print a retraction for previous false beheading stories. . . .

At the same time, the Associated Press has refused to run the story of a verified massacre in Iraq discovered on June 29 and supported by named sources, eyewitness statements, and photographic evidence provided by noted independent journalist Michael Yon in his dispatch, Bless the Beasts and Children.

I would like for the Associated Press to formally explain why they are willing to run thinly and falsely sourced insurgent propaganda as unquestioned fact without any independent verification, but refuses to publish a freely offered account by a noted combat corespondent that some consider this generation's Ernie Pyle.

Is it because the massacre documented by Yon was conducted by alleged al Qaeda in Iraq terrorists, and could not be ascribed to sectarian violence? It certainly could not be because of cost, as Yon has offered both his text and pictures to any and all media outlets free of charge. It could not be because of a question of validity, as his account was photographed, videotaped, and witnessed by dozens of American and Iraqi soldiers, some of them named, who could easily be contacted by the Associated Press for independent, on the record confirmation.

Why is the Associated Press willing to run the claimed of a false massacre on June 28, but unwilling to report a well-documented and freely-offered account of a massacre that was discovered just one day later?

I await your response with interest.

Actually, I don't expect a response at all, but if they should respond, I'll be sure to publish it.
Posted by Mike 2007-07-05 15:12|| || Front Page|| [12 views ]  Top

#1 Important questions that need to be asked. Thanks for posting, Mike.
Posted by Scooter McGruder 2007-07-05 16:32||   2007-07-05 16:32|| Front Page Top

#2 I hope the day is soon in coming when MSM falsehoods are greeted by a flood of such letters. In the meanwhile we'll just have to settle for them losing gigantic portions of market share as a disgruntled public migrates away from such traitorous drivel.
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-07-05 22:11||   2007-07-05 22:11|| Front Page Top

23:16 ruprecht
23:12 ruprecht
23:07 ruprecht
22:11 Silentbrick
21:32 swksvolFF
21:29 trailing wife
21:28 swksvolFF
21:11 SteveS
20:55 trailing wife
20:52 SteveS
20:15 DooDahMan
20:04 Super Hose
20:02 Silentbrick
19:49 Super Hose
19:33 Spanky B. Hayes2804
19:13 Chantry
19:09 Nero
19:08 Nero
18:56 Frank G
18:37 trailing wife
18:31 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677
18:29 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677
18:23 trailing wife
18:21 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com