You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
WWF: 'Five Years Left To Save The Planet'
2007-05-16
Our planet is just five years away from climate change catastrophe - but can still be saved, according to a new report.
What the fuc& does the WWF care about the planet?
The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) warns governments have until 2012 to "plant the seeds of change" and make positive moves to limit carbon emissions.
Ahh, now I see what's going on here. I've been duped by morons!
If they fail to do so, the WWF's Vision For 2050 warns "generations to come will have to live with the compromises and hardships caused by their inability to act".
We're already suffering those consequences it seems. Over half our congress has no brain, no spine, no direction, and no clue and it shows. I won't even talk about the EU.
"We have a small window of time in which we can plant the seeds of change, and that is the next five years," James Leape, from the WWF, said.
It'll never happen. I'd better get out there and drive my mid-70's sports car like there was no tomorrow. Because there won't be.
"We cannot afford to waste them. This is not something that governments can put off until the future."
My contribution will be to fart less often. You guys' contribution can be to stop breathing. Get to work, no time to waste!
Between now and 2050, the world's energy needs are expected to double.
That's OK. The way things are going, all the new players will be running on nuclear energy.
But the Climate Solutions document says technologies already available could be harnessed to produce enough sustainable energy to power the planet while also reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 60-80%.
Ooh! A document!
The WWF report also states that nuclear power is not necessary to cut carbon emissions.
Instead, there will be manna from heaven.
The finding is in stark contrast to the UK Government's insistence upon the need to go nuclear.
What do those oafs know? They don't have The Document!
Keith Allott, head of WWF-UK's climate change programmes, said: "This report shows that although the scale of the climate change challenge can seem daunting, it can be tackled provided we act with real urgency.
And money. Lots of money. Most of which will go into "research".
"We can slash carbon emissions and meet global energy demand without resorting to the red herring of nuclear power.
All in the next five years of course.
"The big question is whether the world's statesmen will have the strength and vision to make this happen - and Britain will be key to that."
Uh, yeah. And then Britain will single-handedly develop a Mars shuttle next year and head off to save Mars from the global warming it's experiencing, too. But don't worry, it's only experiencing 97% of the global warming us terrans are experiencing, so we have an additional 3.2 weeks to save it. Plenty of time.
Posted by:gorb

#13  Iff recent, post-2000 low-orbit asteroid flybys are any measure, Global MSM > EARTH WILL BE SAVED BY PCORRECTLY PRETENDING ITS NOT IN DANGER, where the OWG cannot confirm = or deny ... it can = can NOT ... control = not control ... the asteroid = nuthin there.

MOTHER SHIPTON's "Dragon's Tail..." > to me looks more like a DRAGON/HORSE's HEAD, not a tail. ala FATIMA's THIRD SECRET + "WINGED HORSE/PEGASUS". You see what happens, Moriarty, when you feed hosses too much ambrosia!
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-05-16 22:50  

#12  Better lay in a stock of Jack and maybe pick up some of those happy meals at McDonalds.
Posted by: Jinegum Peacock9131   2007-05-16 21:07  

#11  Jupiter, Neptune, Triton, Enceladus, Saturn, Pluto, Mars

I blame NASA and their SUV rovers.
Posted by: ed   2007-05-16 20:42  

#10  Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
Posted by: Leroidavid   2007-05-16 20:32  

#9  The WWF is dead wrong.

Serious scientists know today that the global warming is provoked by the increase of the sun radiation, and that, after the year 2040, the sun radiation will decrease, leading to a decrease of the Earth temperature.

The proof is that the temperature on Mars is rising too, and at the same speed as it is on Earth.

Just look there:

"Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says"

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
Posted by: Leroidavid   2007-05-16 20:29  

#8  The World Wide Fund for Nature has been around for years. I assume it has been hijacked by enviro crazies as most of these organizations seem to have been.

BTW, the 'We have 5 years left' is code for we must have a Kyoto II when Kyoto I runs out in 2012.
Posted by: phil_b   2007-05-16 19:04  

#7  Should we start preparing like they did in "When Worlds Collide"?
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2007-05-16 16:33  

#6  I strongly believe that if someone like the Hildebeast does get into the White House our whole system of elections will radically change virtually overnight. There are already moves being made in the CA State Assembly to throw all this states' electoral college votes towards whoever wins the popular vote effectively canceling the electoral college system.

I wouldn't put it past the Hildebeast to assue near-dictatorial powers citing some kind of Constitutional crisis before the next election throws it out of office. They suggested doing this in the 2000 election debacle.

With that said, this group the WWF must be so new that DiscoverTheNetworks,org doesn't even have an entry on them yet.

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-05-16 16:09  

#5  So let's terraform Mars and Venus now!
Posted by: 3dc   2007-05-16 14:01  

#4  Little do these self-important posers recognize that "the planet" has at various points in its history been a noxious molten rock and an ocean covered sea planet; its land mass has been dominated at various times by jungles, deserts and massive ice sheets and been through several extinction events which wiped out the overwhelming majority of species millions of years before anything vaguely man-like emerged. "The planet" will be fine whatever we do. It's bigger, older and much less sentimental than we are. Concern for human health and welfare is reasonable, even admirable, and we shouldnt destroy natural systems if we can avoid it, but that's because its bad for us, not "the planet". If we extincted ourselves and every plant and large animal in existence (which we probably can't, but anyway), new life would evolve from the cockroaches or bacteria or whatever the heck was left. The planet would be fine. We would have died off massively in some really awful ways, but Earth would soldier on without us.

I advocate perspective.
Posted by: Baba Tutu   2007-05-16 13:03  

#3  Let's see, it's May 16th. I believe all the seeds have already been planted. Maybe we should concentrate on watering the seeds.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-05-16 10:52  

#2  In the old days, false prophets were stoned to death. Consider it quality control.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-05-16 08:36  

#1  "We have a small window of time in which we can plant the seeds of change, and that is the next five years," James Leape, from the WWF, said.

Translation: We don't expect a leftist US government with Hillary as prez to last more than four years, so we have this tight time frame to wreck the US economy.
Posted by: badanov   2007-05-16 07:39  

00:00