| Submit your comments on this article |
| Europe |
| SpaceWar: US Versus Russia On ABM |
| 2007-07-17 |
| In the near future, Europe may host two anti-ballistic missile systems, one operated exclusively by the United States and the other a joint project involving America, Russia and other European countries. According to some experts, the initiatives advanced by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who proposed joint use of the Gabala radar in Azerbaijan and a radar in southern Russia, have not convinced the United States to revise its plans to deploy ABM systems in Poland and the Czech Republic. Washington has not rejected Putin's proposals outright but is trying to adapt them to its strategic defense program without fundamentally changing the program itself. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Stephen Mull, the U.S. acting assistant secretary for political-military affairs, recently said the United States did not accept Gabala as a substitute for the plans it was pursuing with its Czech and Polish allies. But it is looking forward to "constructive dialogue" during bilateral expert-level consultations with Moscow about the possible integration of the Gabala site. Moscow will not be happy because the proposal Putin made to President George W. Bush at the G8 summit in Germany called for the joint use of the Gabala radar as a substitute for elements of a U.S. ABM system in the two East European countries. Later, the Russian president made an even more significant proposal. He said at a news conference in Kennebunkport, Maine: "The number of parties to this consultation could be expanded through the European countries who are interested in resolving the issue. And the idea is to achieve this through the forum of the Russia-NATO Council." He also proposed establishing "an information exchange center in Moscow" involving the joint use of the radar that is being built near Armavir in southern Russia. "A similar center could be established in one of the European capitals, in particular, in Brussels, for example," Putin added. Washington has not yet formulated its response to these proposals, and it is not clear if it is pondering them or has already decided to soft-pedal the issue. American experts have noted that there is a lot of interest among European countries in working on a regional ABM system in the NATO-Russian Council, but also warned about the complexity of the project. The Russian president's initiatives, if accepted, would internationalize the ABM project. This would remove a great deal of concern and mutual suspicion, but it would also entail the exchange of technologies. Washington is probably not happy about the latter part, as it has quite a few ABM technologies it does not want to share. The United States is unlikely to bury the idea of an ABM deployment site in Europe. While experts hold consultations and foreign and defense ministers discuss relevant issues, the United States will start deploying its ABM elements in Poland and the Czech Republic. As Rice said, the United States needs "to continue to move forward with the Czech Republic and with Poland." She added, though: "But we do agree that this could be an area for which U.S.-Russian cooperation could make a gigantic leap forward." These words were not an attempt to sweeten the pill. It looks as if Washington intends to work on two projects simultaneously, one a purely American ABM system, and the other a joint regional one. |
| Posted by:Delphi |
| #6 This would remove a great deal of concern and mutual suspicion, but it would also entail the exchange of technologies. ZERO technology exchange with Russia. We all know where it'll end up next. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2007-07-17 23:45 |
| #5 Do we need to defend Euros? It would be cheaper to make some arrangement with Vlad. We are too close to the Saudis and they are too close to Iran. That could change, should common sense prevail. Read the full text of Vlad's post G8 press conference. Am we missing something? http://www.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2007/06/04/2149_type82916_132772.shtml |
| Posted by: McZoid 2007-07-17 20:40 |
| #4 Hi, Free Radical! You've been busy for a while -- we missed you. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2007-07-17 20:38 |
| #3 HINDU.com > Russia-China repeat calls for NON-US DOMINATED, "MULTI-POLAR" WORLD. Key phrase or premise here being NON-US DOMINATED. Russia's greatest post-Cold War fear remains China's usurpation of Russia's role as self-proclaimed, primary counter = anti-USA/Western nation in Eurasia + World + future OWG. As for anti-US ABM = anti-GMD, WORK CONTINUES IN BOTH RUSSIA + CHINA ON END/TERMINAL-STAGE MANEUVER MISSLE TECH. DUMB OR MIRV-TYPE WARHEADS WILL BASICALLY BECOME MICRO-INTELLIGENT UAVS. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-07-17 20:38 |
| #2 Transparent attempt by Putin to split NATO. Same old trick that they were using in the 70's & 80's. |
| Posted by: Free Radical 2007-07-17 20:19 |
| #1 Or, what I am hearing is Bush is telling Putie: "We are willing to work with you on protecting everyone from rogue nuke attacks, but we sure as hell don't trust you to get it right so we are keeping our own system separate." |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2007-07-17 15:13 |