Oh, this movie started out so well! Cruise was really believable as a divorced father and crane operator trying to eke out a living and deal with his ex and kids. The beginning invasion effects were incredible and the speed and savagery with which our normal, everyday modern world was transformed into hell just kept me on the edge of my seat!
That was the first 20-30 minutes, however, and then the movie sank into a morass of melodrama, illogic, and idiocy. Spielberg always seems to need to stop all the action right when it's getting good so we can watch our hero pour out his heart and all have a good cry. Then the movie stalls out and can't get back in gear again. In fact, it can't even find credibility or logic again and flails about desperately to find a way to wrap things up. Who needs plot when you've got a lot of screaming, running, explosions and other special effects, right?
Snarky comments that hopefully don't give too much away:
o Aliens buried these giant, three-legged killing machines beneath the Earth a million years ago? Why didn't they just take over the planet then?! Too easy? Not enough humans to zap?
o These killing machines have some convenient metal cages that can hold about a dozen people and keep them fresh so the aliens can snack while on the go. If you find yourself in one of these cages, make sure any Palestinian suicide bombers with you get selected as a snack first, and you will be free!
o The aliens are capable of space travel, generating force fields, and building giant killing machines, but they don't know anything about IR or amplified-light night vision?
I could go on and on, but I'll leave it as this. My recommendation is that you wait 'til it's on DVD and rent it.
Posted by: Dar ||
06/30/2005 10:35 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11131 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Or skip it completely and enjoy the George Pal version.
Posted by: Robert Crawford ||
06/30/2005 12:12 Comments ||
Top||
#2
Thanks Dar!
Posted by: Yosemite Sam ||
06/30/2005 12:58 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Of course, we all remember the story line was written by the guy who made it "about Iraq" - the screenwriter who was featured in the Canadian mag .... oh, Stephen Koeppe? Sumptin likdat.
Posted by: Bobby ||
06/30/2005 14:54 Comments ||
Top||
#4
Bobby--I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not? There was nothing in the film that appeared to refer to Iraq. At the beginning of the invasion when the aliens are blowing up buildings the young girl asks her dad (Cruise) if they're being attacked by terrorists. That's all--nothing political implied by that.
And, even when they're being slaughtered wholesale, the American soldiers are shown in a good light as being staunch defenders while trying to stem the tide and impose some order so the refugees can get out. I think Spielberg, regardless of his politics, values the American soldier, especially after his work on "Saving Private Ryan" and "Band of Brothers".
I'm just disappointed because this movie could have been SO much more with him at the helm and the budget they had. It just tanks halfway through into a ridiculous mess--from the moment Cruise's chracter runs into Tim Robbins's character, it takes a nosedive leaving you wondering if the projectionist put in the wrong reel.
Posted by: Dar ||
06/30/2005 15:28 Comments ||
Top||
#5
Dar:
He's not kidding. The idiot screenwriter told a Canadian paper that the whole film was an alagory for Iraq.
#6
I was hoping they would make the new version as exactly like the book as possible. Leave it to Hollyweird to screw things up.
Posted by: Deacon Blues ||
06/30/2005 16:06 Comments ||
Top||
#7
Dar, imagine for a minute that the heroic Americans are instead Heroic Iraqis and the Alien invaders are American troops and you'll start to see what the screenwriter was getting at.
He may have invented that after the fact, he may have written that in from day one, but his comments ensured I won't be paying to see this movie in the theaters.
#8
rjschwartz - I won't be paying to see it at all.
I know the story, Tom Cruise has gotten really tiresome, and I don't see why I should waste my time and money enriching more Hollyweird idiots.
I think I'll put my time to more useful ventures. Watching oil paint dry comes to mind....
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
06/30/2005 16:21 Comments ||
Top||
#9
Thanks, guys--I had no idea! Guess I missed that article. I certainly saw nothing like that in the movie to even hint that it was political in any way. Believe me, you'd *really* have to go out on a limb to even begin to compare the WoT with this movie!
I don't think anyone who sees this movie is going to walk away thinking of Iraq. American soldiers are clearly portrayed as the good guys--they're in uniform, in Humvees, and in Abrams tanks, i.e. distinctly and obviously American, and they're giving their all. Either that screenwriter was talking out of his @ss to make a cheap swipe, or his contributions were revised, because there ain't nothin' political in this movie that I could see.
Posted by: Dar ||
06/30/2005 16:23 Comments ||
Top||
#10
I haven't seen the movie yet, but based on the WaPo, it seems more an allegory for Islamism, the enemy within.
[rant] Hollywood consistently portrays people as brainless herd animals whose immediate response to adversity is fear, flight, and a trampling every-man-for-himself panic. We proved Hollywood decisively wrong on 9/11, when in the face of an enormous mind-boggling tragedy, the citizens of NYC and Washington acted calmly, rationally. They evacuated a burning WTC and lower Manhattan in a dignified manner; other citizens offered them food, water, shelter, and communications as needed. One man even chose to remain behind so that his disabled friend would not die alone. Hollywood wonders why no one sees their dumb movies anymore; I for one am tired of being sneered at and misunderestimated. [/rant]
#11
This helps, Dar, as I was tempted to spend the time and dough; not now.
Cruise is such an axxhole anyway, with his Scientology jibe and his ego tripping with someone young enough to be his daughter. Sorry, I can't get beyond the person. Call it mission impossible.
Posted by: Captain America ||
06/30/2005 16:42 Comments ||
Top||
#13
War of the Worlds is a very well written Sci-Fi classic. It's unsurprising to me that Cruise could eliminate coherence and mussle the plot. Obviously, I am still bitter over renting Minority Report. Cosner is worse at least Cruise has stayed away from the Robin Hood legend.
Posted by: Super Hose ||
06/30/2005 18:10 Comments ||
Top||
#14
Barbara, is it too much to ask to get my name right? You always add a "t" to my last name. I feel as if you're trying to correct me and I've called up my parents and grandparents and double-checked my drivers license and birth certificate and confirmed my spelling is the correct one.
I feel as if you're trying to make a point and I don't get it. Please help.
#18
Maybe they should have reanimated Kubrick rather than letting Spielberg go it alone.
Eh. That wouldn't have worked; not even zombies are immune to this crap. I saw a special about "Land of the Dead", and Romero babbled something about how this script -- which was written before 9/11, by his own admission -- is an allegory for our times and the war on terror, when people are expected to get with the program or they're kicked out.
All I can figure is that Hollywood types are so insulated, they never hear anything contrary to the Donk talking points, and no one ever challenges them on the idiocy that dribbles from their mouths. The interviewer should have cut that response from the show -- it made Romero look like a dork, honestly -- or challenged him on it: "Who, exactly, has been exiled from the US?"
God save us from a Hollyweird in which low-budget B-movie makers think they're telling Great Stories That Will Change the World.
Posted by: Robert Crawford ||
06/30/2005 20:31 Comments ||
Top||
#20
"Certainly, there are a lot of political undertones and overtones," Koepp (the screenwriter) says. "But we tried consciously to never lead with the politics. That's a guaranteed way to make a piece of crap.
"The political tones of this movie will emerge for themselves. In the '50s, 'War of the Worlds' was, 'My God, the commies are coming to get us.' Now it's about fear of terrorism. In other parts of the world, the new movie will be fear of American invasion. It will be clearly about the Iraq war for them," says the screenwriter.
#21
Sea, you can to your list that Hollywood seems not to know things that the rest of the human race figured out many thousands of years. Lost, a show I quite like, has people wondering around in the jungle being attacked by large animals, and no one on a plane full of people seems aware that a long pointed stick is an effective defence against any large animal.
#22
rjschwarz, honey, I'm sorry. There's no point - I just typed without thinking and that's what came out. I've seen it spelled that way by other people, and it must have just stuck. I should copy your name and paste it rather than typing it.
Wanna kiss and make out up? ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
06/30/2005 22:34 Comments ||
Top||
This week comes the previously careful Sen. Barack Obama, flapping his wings in Time magazine and explaining that he's a lot like Abraham Lincoln, only sort of better. "In Lincoln's rise from poverty, his ultimate mastery of language and law, his capacity to overcome personal loss and remain determined in the face of repeated defeat--in all this he reminded me not just of my own struggles."
Oh. So that's what Lincoln's for. Actually Lincoln's life is a lot like Mr. Obama's. Lincoln came from a lean-to in the backwoods. His mother died when he was 9. The Lincolns had no money, no standing. Lincoln educated himself, reading law on his own, working as a field hand, a store clerk and a raft hand on the Mississippi. He also split some rails. He entered politics, knew more defeat than victory, and went on to lead the nation through its greatest trauma, the Civil War, and past its greatest sin, slavery.
Barack Obama, the son of two University of Hawaii students, went to Columbia and Harvard Law after attending a private academy that taught the children of the Hawaiian royal family. He made his name in politics as an aggressive Chicago vote hustler in Bill Clinton's first campaign for the presidency.
#1
rabid monkeys in the zoo. Let's move them into the homes of the people so concerned about their welfare. Hey Sen Turbin, Sen Eyes Wide Open, we've decided to release them since they are such aggrieved little bunny rabbits. We've rented the house next door to you for them to live in. Enjoy.
#2
Thats why I could never work at such a facility. It's not that I am afraid of these yahoos, its just that I know that I would bitch slap someone who threatened my family. The fact that jihadis like that aren't beaten to a pulp every day is a shining example of how professional these guards are at doing the job. Me I would find a camera blind spot and give the offender a baton massage.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis ||
06/30/2005 10:49 Comments ||
Top||
#4
Everyone is so damn sensitive about "cultural differences"... it's about time someone got sensitive to mine. Going back 1500 years or so, my people had a custom that should be re-instituted... outlawing. It didn't mean you operated outside the law, it meant you were outside the protection of the law and anyone could kill your ass without having to worry about bloodfeud or paying weregild. Unlawful combatant = outlaw. Kill 'em where you find 'em or drain them for info first if you must but don't forget the obligitory pork barbeque so you have a pit to bury 'em in.
#7
hmmmm kiss your Mom with that mouth, Cretle? With tongue too, I bet
Posted by: Frank G ||
06/30/2005 21:41 Comments ||
Top||
#8
oh look, the rabid monkey can talk. Not a big vocabulary, but though he sadly lacks in verbal skills, he can still get attention by throwing his poop and making screeching sounds.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
