Hi there, !
Today Wed 04/14/2004 Tue 04/13/2004 Mon 04/12/2004 Sun 04/11/2004 Sat 04/10/2004 Fri 04/09/2004 Thu 04/08/2004 Archives
Rantburg
533724 articles and 1862075 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 76 articles and 303 comments as of 19:13.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    Non-WoT               
Khatami backs off from Sadr
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
3 00:00 Super Hose [7] 
0 [1] 
1 00:00 Frank G [2] 
11 00:00 B [7] 
0 [5] 
5 00:00 Zenster [6] 
0 [2] 
4 00:00 B [] 
1 00:00 .com [] 
1 00:00 Old Grouch [] 
10 00:00 Gentle [4] 
3 00:00 .com [3] 
1 00:00 Shipman [] 
0 [1] 
2 00:00 Barbara Skolaut [6] 
0 [] 
42 00:00 Old Grouch [2] 
0 [4] 
7 00:00 mhw [] 
0 [] 
0 [1] 
2 00:00 Phil B [1] 
12 00:00 .com [1] 
22 00:00 mhw [7] 
0 [1] 
5 00:00 HalfEmpty [] 
2 00:00 Barbara Skolaut [] 
12 00:00 Shipman [3] 
Page 0: Non-WoT
0 []
Page 1: WoT Operations
0 [2]
4 00:00 Raj [4]
5 00:00 .com []
0 [1]
3 00:00 Super Hose [5]
6 00:00 Super Hose [5]
0 []
5 00:00 Super Hose [3]
0 [1]
11 00:00 mhw [1]
3 00:00 OldSpook [2]
2 00:00 Zenster []
1 00:00 Raj []
0 [2]
0 [1]
2 00:00 .com [1]
0 [2]
2 00:00 Barbara Skolaut [2]
0 [1]
0 []
13 00:00 Long Hair Republican [9]
0 [4]
4 00:00 Phil B [7]
0 []
1 00:00 CrazyFool []
0 [1]
0 [3]
0 [3]
1 00:00 Barbara Skolaut [2]
0 []
0 [1]
0 [3]
27 00:00 GK [2]
0 [2]
0 [3]
0 [2]
1 00:00 Ghostrider [2]
5 00:00 .com [2]
12 00:00 mhw []
4 00:00 Phil Fraering [2]
8 00:00 .com [2]
2 00:00 .com [1]
2 00:00 eric []
8 00:00 Mike [2]
6 00:00 .com [3]
23 00:00 B [2]
Page 3: Non-WoT
0 []
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Religious Unrest in Greece Results in War!
Uh, sorta...

In an interesting Easter event, there is a "war" waged between the "Saint Markos" Church and the "Pangia Erythiani" Church on the island of Chios, Greece.

Click through the pictures to see for yourself. Looks to me like the Panagia guys really laid on the artillery, in this sequence.

Why? Who cares, heh! This is the way to fight over religion, methinks. Bravo to the Chios guys - mebbe you should send a delegation to [insert Chief Grand Doodah of Islam here] and explain the concept of peaceful disagreement.

Here’s another rather strange Easter thingy I ran across Googling for Chios links... Easter seems to bring out some weird shit! And there’s prolly more out there for you True Blue Googlers!

Happy Easter!
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 7:58:33 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court
This is from a person I read often -- it’s just a book review, but I’m posting it because halfway down it turns into a commentary about Neoconservatism and the Middle East. Somewhat interesting, I felt.

Wasn’t sure where to file it under -- or if it was even appropriate to post. Delete if it’s not.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 10:19:40 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  It's the Highway of Death, 102 years early.

Bizzare link but entertaining.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 12:59 Comments || Top||

#2  Amusing that that writer thinks so poorly of modern Muslims that he compares them to the "backward" members of Arthur's time.

And he thinks the NEOCONS are arrogant???
Posted by: rkb || 04/11/2004 13:37 Comments || Top||

#3  Why find it amusing? The Taliban were as bad as anything to be found in Arthur's time, whether in the real world or in the Camelot of fiction.

And I didn't see him condemning the entirety of Muslims.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 14:10 Comments || Top||

#4 
"In Connecticut Yankee, thousands are killed and in the end The Boss is stuffed in a cave and society goes back to the way it had been before he ever arrived. In real life, getting rid of the Taliban and the Husseins was a fabulous idea in the abstract, but in practice it has meant killing thousands of people, and to what end? Afghanistan is controlled by warlords, women outside Kabul are still treated as chattel, and the Taliban are actually coming back. Iraq looks due for a period of civil war followed by the establishment of an Islamist state (or three) in which most people will be no freer and no less fearful than they were under Saddam Hussein."
Here the author argues that since nothing has been or will be accomplished in Afghanistan and Iraq (which is, at the least, debatable), nothing should have been done. (He also ignores the benefits of our actions beyond the borders: Is the world better off now that Libya has abandoned its nuclear weapons program? But I digress.)
"Sneer if you will about 'goody-goody talk and moral suasion,' but as macho as you might feel as you put it on your agenda, the fact is that mass murder is not very constructive. Gosh, who'd have thought?"
Interesting rhetorical device, but after creating the false dichotomy that the only alternative to "moral suasion" is "mass murder," he then argues that, since "mass murder is not very constructive," (with the implication that truly moral people don't engage in it) the only real alternative to "moral suasion" is to (again) do nothing. (The not-so-well hidden implication is that since the allies are not using "moral suasion," they must be using "mass murder.") But there is a wide spectrum of possible actions between these two alternatives, including what we're doing now. (George Bush isn't Josef Stalin or Adolf Hitler, and the American army in Iraq is not the Japanese army in China, or the Roman army in Carthage.)

In taking the cheap shot, Cadre fails to examine the real issues that Twain is exploring: Is it possible to "save" a society that doesn't want/isn't ready to be saved? And even if it is not possible, is it moral to stand by and do nothing? The Boss, a 19th century man, has no doubts: Of course you take action, of course you try to improve things. Contrast him with the our century's cultural relativists (who argue that all cultures have equal merit, so hands off!) and opportunists (reform shouldn't get in the way of business: Hi there, France). But The Boss fails, and in his failure he is amazed by the response of the people, who obviously (to him) have the greatest chance to benefit. Perhaps Twain is arguing that all successful revolutions have to start from within?
Posted by: Old Grouch || 04/11/2004 15:03 Comments || Top||

#5  Oh yeah, deep. I'm tossing Clemens on the trash heap - Davey's got my six.

A simple knockoff by Simon is deeper, yet mysteriously on-point:
All lies in jest.
Still a man hears
What he wants to hear
And disregards the rest.


Li'l Davey Deepster's kerfuffle is found wanting, IMO.
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 16:33 Comments || Top||

#6  Old Grouch> "He also ignores the benefits of our actions beyond the borders: Is the world better off now that Libya has abandoned its nuclear weapons program?"

According to State Department's own reports that I've found online (http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/pgtrpt/2000/2441.htm), Khaddaffi has been trying to deassociate himself and Libya from terrorism from atleast 2000.

So, if you think that stopping his WMD was a result of the Bush administration's actions in Iraq, then were Khaddafi's earlier efforts due to the things done by the Clinton administration?
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 18:25 Comments || Top||

#7  .com> Probably an old pic -- I know that Adam Cadre is in his thirties now.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 18:28 Comments || Top||

#8  Aris - is it the Hammer & Sickle that make you feel so warm and fuzzy? Just teasing.

BTW, it seems he's one of those assholes who link to someone else's site (i.e. David Glassner)... if not, then "Adam" is actually Davey and he's in year 2 at MIT and, thus, nowhere near 30. So which one is he? Asshole or MIT student? Lol!
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 18:53 Comments || Top||

#9  Aris, I intended the Libya item as an example, and am perfectly willing to consider the proposition that the Afghanistan/Iraq invasions may not have been the sole reason for Khaddaffi's behavior. (And which adminstration claims credit for it is unimportant to me, I'm just glad he decided to clean up his act.) There are other examples that could be cited.

Any thoughts on the rest of my arguments?
Posted by: Old Grouch || 04/11/2004 20:19 Comments || Top||

#10  David Glasser and Adam Cadre are two distinct and well-known individuals in the Interactive Fiction community -- not sure what link you are talking about, but Adam probably had permission.

According to him, the name in his birth certificate is Muhammad Adam Dahlan al-Kadri, so you can probably drop the quotes around 'Adam'.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 20:22 Comments || Top||

#11  I like the Connecticut Yankee analogy (I'd actually thought of it myself, although I've never written about it), and I think it does represent the downside risk of the administration's strategy. Thanks for posting the link!
Posted by: Arnold Kling || 04/11/2004 20:44 Comments || Top||

#12  "David Glasser and Adam Cadre are two distinct and well-known individuals in the Interactive Fiction community"

Lol! Aris, you're so full of bullshit it's amazing. Did a little Googling, did ya, on David Glasser? Pfeh, you're a disingenuous goof: it was David GlassNer, not Glasser, that your boy Mohammad "Adam" linked to. Who is a kid attending MIT.

Next time you wanna bluff or post bullshit, go more than one level into it, K? Wotta joke.
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 20:51 Comments || Top||

#13  Interesting, well written and many good points,

BUT


Typical. It's exactly the same theme as every single solitary NPR piece I have ever heard in my entire lifetime (yes, I know it's not a NPR piece).... which is this:

Oh sure, "it" looks happy and functional on the outside, the people are smiling, seem carefree and healthy. But it's all just a facade that hides a dark and sinister plot....[cue the dark music in minor chords]

Here is how I read this brilliant piece of analysis you just gave us:

It is nice that the soup kitchen down the street feeds people who would otherwise starve to death. It's nicer than it is on the other side of town where they just step over people starving to death, and no one does anything about it....

BUT

ultimately, the people who feed the starving people are really the bad ones. Yes, that's right you see, because if those people live instead of die, then, someday it's possible,, that if the nice people were to ever stop feeding them, then they would all die at once, rather than one time ...and wouldn't that be terrrible that they all lived happily for an extra 10 or 20 years when something bad COULD happen to them later on. The plan isn't perfect you see, so we must stop the people feeding them until we can all agree on a perfect plan...which will be never..which means I don't have to feel guilty about stepping over the starving people with stomachs protruding and bones sticking out because, by doing nothing at all, I'M BETTER THAN those PHONY people who feed them .


Aris - I recommend a logic class for you and all the others who need to be told what you see and feel when you look at pictures hanging in art galleries.

If A=B and B=A then A must = C....right? Jeesh.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 20:58 Comments || Top||

#14  B - You've made me hungry! As one of those evil capitalists whose work and deeds make no difference in the world, and in honor of the 7 new hostages, I think I'll order Chinese tonight! Lol!

Drop Clemens' body of work which has stood for 100 years for a twinkie lightweight like al Kadri's assessment? Nahhhhhh, I don't think so.

"Twinkies! Yumm!"
-Homer (No, no, the other Homer!)
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 21:07 Comments || Top||

#15  Old Grouch> As regards the rest of your comment: I think that Adam Cadre's definition of "mass murder" probably includes all warmaking -- and to a certain extent it could probably be indeed considered such if we define "murder" to be all deliberate cold-blooded taking of human life.

But either way, I generally disagree with him on the necessity of such warfare -- yes, Iraq seems to be falling pray to Islamofascism, but this doesn't mean *all* such wars need lead to the same results.

In short, the fact that invading Iraq was bloody stupid, doesn't mean that invading *any* dictatorship would have been likewise stupid. :-)
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 21:07 Comments || Top||

#16  .com> I'm really not certain what paranoia is leading you now. "Did a little googling"? I'm also a part of the Interactive Fiction community and that's why these names are well-known by me. And once again I don't know what link you are talking about. David Glasser is a member of the IF community. I don't know of any "David Glassner".

As for Adam Cadre being a kid attending MIT, since 2000 he's also a published author, so even more kudos to him if he managed that while still studying.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 21:15 Comments || Top||

#17  I keep on rereading your comments .com, and I really think you've exceeded all levels of bizarreness and insanity. What kind of "bluff" are you talking about? Is this a conspiracy on my part to do what?

Take your medication. I really don't get you.

And B, try not to be the chorus to a man suffering as many delusions as .com. I'm still not certain what you people are accusing me of doing.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 21:24 Comments || Top||

#18  The link on Al Kadri's site to "his" picture is to a kid at MIT named David GlassNer. You brought Glasser into this because either you're a twit cuz you don't pay attention or you're a disingenuous blowhard and he's just a canard.

Kadri's one of those assholes who posts BS links to other people's sites - thinking himself clever.

You're either a retard or an ass. 'Tis more than clear. Your closing bit about Kadri is just precious bullshit! Lol!
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 21:31 Comments || Top||

#19  No, the link to his picture goes to a pic hosted at www.davidglasser.net, in particular to this site here: http://www.davidglasser.net/ifhos/
which lists several dozens members of the IF community, with photos attached to many of them.

You are either a liar or just insane, .com. Either way you've made a fool of yourself.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 21:36 Comments || Top||

#20  Aris, apparently you are only deluding yourself. No one is fooled by your little technique of asking, "I'm just curious what you think" as you put up a piece that you want us to read. And I am certainly not persuaded by your sudden victimization status.

Aris: Poor me, (swoon and fans self) they all accuse me of ...of....something...I just don't understand. I was standing here, minding my own business and they all just started to descend upon me...for no reason...and those vile creatures..how they scare me so.

It's not surprising you don't get .com - since you can't grasp how stupid this analysis was. Let's let them die...so that somebody can't kill them all in the future. Brilliant! Just Brilliant. I'm sure we'll see it on a monument somewhere..."Do Nothing to Make the World a Better Place".
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 21:39 Comments || Top||

#21  B> I found the piece interesting. I agree with the many of the specifics if not some of the conclusions. And yes I wanted you to read it.

Did I ever deny all that?

.com has fragrantly lied, then when I tried to be civil for once rather than my usual technique of blasting him to hell and beyond for being an ABSOLUTE LYING MORON WHO SHOULD GET SOME ELECTROCUTION THERAPY, .com kept on with his lies and strange insinuations about "bluffing" and being disingenuous when I correctly typed the name he had himself mistyped. There's no 'N' in Glasser, .com you idiot boy.

No, I just don't get this attitude on you part.

And no, I never said you "scared" me. I am just saying that you're all little retarded morons from hell -- may you be anally probed by extraterrestrials.

There. Since civility doesn't work with utter assholes such as yourselves, perhaps this will work instead, and I won't have to any longer try my hand at niceness.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 21:46 Comments || Top||

#22  and I won't have to any longer try my hand at niceness.

Scoff. This is how I would characterize your attempts at niceness:

What a beautiful dress. It makes you look so much less fat than usual.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 21:52 Comments || Top||

#23  I would like an apology from both of you, btw, though obviously I don't expect one, even after as rabid and obvious lying as all that.

You morons.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 21:53 Comments || Top||

#24  Where .com and you are concerned, this should be the niceness that befits you: "What a beautiful dress. Where did you steal it from?"

You lying sacks of shit.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 21:55 Comments || Top||

#25  That's what you always been saying anyways Aris. Apparently you were the only one who didn't grasp how obvious that was.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 22:01 Comments || Top||

#26  Aris - I did make a mistake, actually TWO!

Mistake #1 - I screwed up the spelling... But that's not the key...

We'll take this REALLY SLOW so you can keep up...

1) Here's Al Kadri's page with link to "his picture".

2) Here's the Page it links to - and this isn't your Al Kadri guy - so he IS an asshole who links to other people's websites. Prolly even thinks himself clever, like you.

3) And this is the home page - showing this kid is an MIT student - and is NOT Al Kadri, asshole, which you already knew.

4) Hell, here's his weblog on Live Journal. He's a kid - doing kid stuff and speaking in kid speak.

Is this your "well known interactive fiction author"? Lol! You suggest that your Al Kadri has scooped the world on Clemens? Lol! You're still the champ asshole of Rantburg, though I do give you a run for your money now and then. But I'll never match your ashattedness - even on my best day going downhill with the wind behind me.

Mistake #2 - I posted something to you. Stupid. You're the biggest fucktard that every rattled a keyboard. What a waste of time. Never again.

BTW, I admitted my mistake. Will Aris The Grate EVER admit one? Lol! Of course not - that's how one gets to BE Aris The Grate! LOL!
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 22:05 Comments || Top||

#27  Yes, my extreme rudeness is *so* obvious at comments #7 and #10 -- which is the point where .com and you started accusing me of bullshitting, logical idiocy, bluffing and various other tidbits.

Since I'm so stupid that I can't see where my rudeness lay, would you mind spelling it out for me? Comments #7 and #10 are the relevant ones. Cheers.

You idiot.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 22:06 Comments || Top||

#28  .com> You screwed up the spelling and then accused me of lying and of being disingenuous and of bluffing and of bullshitting when I corrected you. So, up yours, you lying idiot boy.

The pic Adam linked to *is* Adam's own photo as hosted in David Glasser's site, a site which also hosts pics of several dozen other people, as you would see if you went here: http://www.davidglasser.net/ifhos/

Do you have any reason to believe Adam didn't get permission to link to his own pic there?

David Glasser is indeed a MIT student, class of 2006. Never denied that, did I? Thanks for the link to his livejournal, I didn't know he had one.

But Adam Cadre isn't a MIT student.

And as for the rest you're still an moronic asshole from hell. I demand an apology from you for all the insults you bestowed on me for doing nothing more than correcting you on your errors.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 22:15 Comments || Top||

#29  This thread will be a useful one for future reference, btw. Few times have people ever betrayed in public their innate assholiness as thoroughly as you have, .com.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 22:30 Comments || Top||

#30  You posted inane shit about Mohammad Al Kadri (why do you avoid his real name, hmmm?) - to wit:
"As for Adam Cadre being a kid attending MIT, since 2000 he's also a published author, so even more kudos to him if he managed that while still studying."
Wotta load. But you haven't admitted that was erroneous, have you? Lesseee.... no, amazingly not.

Regards, David Glasser being:
"David Glasser and Adam Cadre are two distinct and well-known individuals in the Interactive Fiction community"
Do you really ascribe this vaunted implied standing to li'l Davey? Appears so...

You still wish to suggest that Mo Al Kadri's book is worthy of consideration in the same venue as Clemens'? LOL! Well, you have gall, I'll give you that! Stupid, but definitely an industrial dose of gall.

As for insulting you, is that possible? You've called others some pretty amazingly offensive names. I recall Zhang Fei showing restraint you couldn't manage in this regard. You screech at entire groups of people calling them names, such as your recent "idiots" classic. You're as guilty of name-calling as anyone who has ever posted on RB, sonny. Much much moreso than most.

My offer: I'll apologize to you for calling you a fucktard and asshole and (below) jerk when you apologize to everyone you've insulted here on RB.

That's the best you'll ever get - and you STILL have never admitted even ONE mistake or error on Rantburg that I've ever seen... and you've been nailed repeatedly. My favorite is when you claimed that governments were monolithic in their actions, when it doesn't take more than a child's mental ability to see that they certainly are - and I gave you an unassailable example. What did you do? Change the subject and engage someone else - and that is your typical approach.

You're truly a jerk, Aris. Unworthy of debate because you never engage honestly - and that is why people go negative with you. You don't deserve better. You have your offer above. Take it or fuck off.
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 22:43 Comments || Top||

#31  apparently we have a cultural misunderstanding, Aris, my kind friend.

I do apologize to you. You have made every effort to be so very polite as you make your condescending remarks. And I must confess, the analysis you presented was truly brilliant. The writer's ability to brush over genocidal murder and come to the verbal conclusion that it would be far better to do nothing at all was truly a work of genius. His masterful ability to make inhumane suffering seem acceptable in polite discussion was allows us to throw off 2,000 years of conventional wisdom about enhancing the human condition and to embrace new "ideals".

Of course, there are those of us who still believe that rape rooms, genocide and dog status for women are not acceptable in the modern world, however, your featured analysis certainly did a masterful job of making those unpleasantries seem more palatable.

Thank you for bringing me such enlightment. I am truly grateful.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 22:43 Comments || Top||

#32  .com> "why do you avoid his real name, hmmm?"

Adam Cadre is his real name - he had it legally changed, and is the one he uses and the one he's better known with. You might just as well ask why I prefer to use "Mark Twain" rather than "Samuel Clemens".

"But you haven't admitted that was erroneous, have you?"

Because it wasn't? The meaning of the sentence was that I found it unlikely that a kid currently at MIT would have published a novel 4 years ago -- and if he did, kudos to him, so I didn't see your point even I accepted your erroneous statement as correct.

"Do you really ascribe this vaunted implied standing to li'l Davey?"

David Glasser is well known in the IF Community, as he's the FAQ maintainer of the relevant newsgroups. Don't care if you don't believe me.

"You still wish to suggest that Mo Al Kadri's book is worthy of consideration in the same venue as Clemens'? "

Ah, even more lies on your part. Nope, I never suggested that and you know I didn't and you therefore lie when you suggest I did. In fact, I don't actually like Adam Cadre's prose at all -- I found his short stories disappointing so I didn't bother to buy his novel, even though he's my favourite IF creator.

I will apologize to *everyone* whom I ever insulted because they corrected me on factual mistakes I made. But the number of these people is a big fat ZERO. I appreciate corrections and have never once in my life insulted people for offering them. Nor will I ever insult them.

"and you STILL have never admitted even ONE mistake or error on Rantburg that I've ever seen... and you've been nailed repeatedly. My favorite is when you claimed that governments were monolithic in their actions, when it doesn't take more than a child's mental ability to see that they certainly are - and I gave you an unassailable example."

I don't remember that debate. Link it to me, and I'll check it out, and admit any mistakes I made there -- but my current guess is that you're just lying again, as you lied in earlier posts and as you lied here again.

So fuck you. I won't apologize for calling nasty little bigots "nasty little bigots", nor for calling you an asshole and a jerk.

Find me even one time I ever insulted someone for offering me a factual correction.

B> Your ability to ignore the fact about his claim that hey, it doesn't actually seem as if you managed to improve matters on Iraq, is also quite remarkable.

But more importantly to the issue here, you've yet again failed to answer the question I so very humbly asked, in short to show me where was I ever rude in my comments #7 or #10, the relevant comments in question.

You fucking moron.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 23:33 Comments || Top||

#33  But more importantly to the issue here, you've yet again failed to answer the question I so very humbly asked, in short to show me where was I ever rude in my comments #7 or #10, the relevant comments in question.

You fucking moron.


LOL! Like I said Aris, it's all just a cultural misunderstanding. You value the presentation, we value the product.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 23:36 Comments || Top||

#34  "But the number of these people is a big fat ZERO."
And there you have it.

You know, you really didn't need to work so hard (50 minutes - impressive, Lol!) when all you were going to do is your usual. Next time, save yourself the trouble and just post:
"The Usual."

Don't worry, everyone will know precisely what that means! Lol!

Aris The Grate. There can be only one, as the storyline goes. LOL! You really do lie like a rug and suck like an F5, Katsaris. So very very singular.
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 23:48 Comments || Top||

#35  In my experience, fucking morons are fucking morons, regardless of culture. For example: People taking offense at simple factual correction, to the point of insanely raving about duplicity, bullshitting, lying, bluffing, conspiracy and so forth, and repeatedly and adamantly refusing correction, are *always* fucking morons.

But then again I'm not a cultural relativist.

And you are still a fucking moron.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 23:50 Comments || Top||

#36  .com> Most of the 50 minutes were spent commenting on the Cypriot president's speech about the Annan plan on the reunification of Cyprus actually. http://www.livejournal.com/users/katsaris/13086.html
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/11/2004 23:53 Comments || Top||

#37  Cool!
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 23:59 Comments || Top||

#38  it doesn't actually seem as if you managed to improve matters on Iraq

Ahh...but that's really MY point now isn't it Aris? You don't seem to grasp that standing by and doing nothing but attempting to verbalize away the horrors of rape rooms, childrens jails and mass genocide make you beneath contempt.

I think Iraq is better off without rape rooms, gassing of Kurds, terror squads and torture. You don't see any difference. I guess that just defines the difference between us, Aris.

If I were the victim of Sadaam's terror, I'd hope the American's or ANYONE, for that matter, came to rescue me.

So Aris, I have decided to curse you with with your own words...may you, rather than some other nameless individual, be the victim of those very sins for which you have apologized away today - and may your only relief be the words and deeds of individuals such as yourself. May you find comfort in knowing that you will get what you are currently willing to give.

Cheers. Sleep well.
Posted by: B || 04/12/2004 0:06 Comments || Top||

#39  B - If I've ever ever offended you, believe me, I am very very sorry!
Posted by: .com || 04/12/2004 0:13 Comments || Top||

#40  "I think Iraq is better off without rape rooms, gassing of Kurds, terror squads and torture. You don't see any difference"

Nope, I do see a quite big difference between an Iraq having those thing and an Iraq that doesn't have them.

It's just that you've not yet succeeded in accomplishing the latter, and the more time passes with Sadr growing in strength, the less likely it seems likely you'll ever succeed in accomplishing it. In which case count the civilians dying as collateral damage, and it's not at all certain they'd be any less than the civilians that'd have been killed in the equivalent time by Saddam. The US had a much nobler cause ofcourse, but this doesn't make the dead people any less dead. And the outcome -- as bad as before for the Iraqi people, and possibly worse. Before they had tyranny, now (if Sadr prevails, or if Iraq is divided) they may have tyranny *and* an unending civil war.

Cadre seems to believe in Twain's position (if that was indeed Twain's position, I've not read the actual book) that this is always the result of warfare, that invasion and outside intervention can't ever actually manage to change anything for the better, that things always revert back to as-bad-as-they-were.

I disagree and feel that it can, that it was simply in *this* case, the case of Iraq, that it seems doomed to fail but that this doesn't necessarily mean that war can't be used at all to overthrow dictators and alleviate suffering. I supported the invasion of Afghanistan, remember? And I supported invading Syria instead of Iraq, remember? You wouldn't have three uncontrollable borders in that case, nor have to juggle between three different ethnic groups...
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/12/2004 0:38 Comments || Top||

#41  .com - lol! I didn't really mean it that way, I just wanted to make a point.

Aris - wow, an actual civil discussion. However, I really don't think it changes anything except the tone with which we are discussing it.

I can accept this as an argument:I disagree and feel that it can, that it was simply in *this* case, the case of Iraq, that it seems doomed to fail but that this doesn't necessarily mean that war can't be used at all to overthrow dictators and alleviate suffering. I supported the invasion of Afghanistan, remember? And I supported invading Syria instead of Iraq, remember? You wouldn't have three uncontrollable borders in that case, nor have to juggle between three different ethnic groups...

Ok...it's an argument that can be made - I just think it's an inhumane one.

Iraq is better off with the Americans ridding it of Sadaam's horrors. Iraq could have democracy if everyone would help. But instead, people like you are damned and determined to put your anti-Americanism and political stances on a higher pedestal than to assist in the efforts to help the Americans form a democracy in Iraq. You do so at the expense of the Iraqi people. Say what you want to whitewash it, but You GLADLY wave away the horrors of Sadaam and point fingers of blame in every direction but your own.

You keep saying that you don't mean it that way, but you do. Your rhetorical hair-splitting may give you comfort, but it doesn't change your willingness to subvert rather than assist the efforts for a free Iraq. It' will be your own bad karma someday, I won't have it be my own by standing by and allowing you to wave away the horrors unchallenged.
Posted by: B || 04/12/2004 6:55 Comments || Top||

#42  Yeouch, glad I stepped out for a beer. Where'd all the broken glass come from? ;-)

B- Your characterization in #13 - LOL! It IS typical NPR, isn't it?

Aris, thanks for the response. Important distinction in re the undesirability of *all* vs *any particular* warfare. And I agree that Cadre wants us to regard any warfare as "mass murder." To me that's dishonest. And it also cheapens the term, leaving us nothing to describe the *real* mass-murderers, when they turn up.
Posted by: Old Grouch || 04/12/2004 15:45 Comments || Top||


Arabia
Rania Al-Baz Lashes Out at Abuse of Women
Rania Al-Baz, an announcer with Saudi Television’s Channel 1 who is recovering after suffering a brutal attack at the hands of her husband, lashed out at the abuse of women from her hospital bed here yesterday. “I want to use what happened to me to draw attention to the plight of abused women in Saudi Arabia,” she told Arab News shortly after surgery to repair one of 13 fractures to her face. Police are currently looking for her husband, Muhammad Bakar Yunus Al-Fallatta, an out-of-work singer, who is facing charges of attempted murder. According to Rania’s mother, Al-Fallatta was angered that his wife answered the telephone and proceeded to beat her. “Rania told me that when he saw her on the telephone he looked angry and was coming to hit her like he had done so many times before,” she told Arab News. “She begged him not to hit her. His reply was: ‘Hit you? I’m not going to hit you, I am going to kill you.’

“What I came to understand from Rania and the maid who saw the whole thing, is that Al-Fallatta knocked Rania down to her knees, then sat on her thighs so that her legs were bent behind her. He then began choking her while punching her in the face, nose, eyes and mouth. He then grabbed a handful of her hair and started banging her head on the floor. When she got up to run, he grabbed her from behind and began smashing her face on the wall until she lost consciousness,” said Rania’s mother. “He left her unconscious for a couple of hours while he showered and changed then bundled her up in a sheet and put her in the family van. When my daughter regained consciousness, she found herself in the van and thought he was taking her to Obhur to bury her. When he heard her moaning and trying to speak, he must have panicked because he pulled into Bugshan Hospital,” added Rania’s mother. According to security at Bugshan Hospital, Al-Fallatta drove in at 2:30 in the morning. He dumped the injured Rania at the emergency room entrance telling nurses and staff that she was the victim of a car accident and was dead. He then left quickly saying he was going to bring other victims of the accident. Al-Fallatta has not been seen since.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 9:07:51 PM || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:

#1 
Al-Fallatta was angered that his wife answered the telephone and proceeded to beat her

When Allan created the universe, one of his main ideas was that wives shouldn't answer the telephone.
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 04/11/2004 21:50 Comments || Top||

#2  Al-Fallatta was angered that his wife answered the telephone

Next time, go ahead and let him answer the phone. Just make sure it's one of those Spanish cell phone bombs. Beheading's too good. They need to start a bit lower.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/11/2004 23:51 Comments || Top||

#3  It is true that most countries have these type of guys around, but Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Jordan seem to have engaged in some kind of bizarre social engineering experiment to manufacture lowlife. In the biblical story Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because 10 righteous men could not be found residing in those cities. I wonder how many loving men you could find in those countries.
With respect to Ummah, maybe God could just take a Mulligan. With a car wreck like Ummah, save the tires if they still have tread but total the rest.
Posted by: Super Hose || 04/12/2004 0:19 Comments || Top||


Toe tags for six in Yemen cops-robbers festivities
Four policemen and two armed robbers were killed yesterday in a shootout in the Ar-Rawda suburb of the Yemeni capital, eyewitnesses said. They said four policemen were killed when the armed men opened fire at a police patrol car as it tried to stop the men’s car and another government-owned car they had stolen. Two of the three bandits were then killed by security forces sent to the scene to chase them. A police officer at the scene said the third robber managed to flee and was being pursued by security forces. Police found in the men’s car a bag containing dozens of stolen car license plates, the officer said. “That indicates that they were part of a car robbery band,” he said.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 1:43:11 PM || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:


Bahrain Vows to Tighten Security After Bank Heist
Bahrain’s financial officials have pledged to step up security measures in banks across the country after a robber made off with 65,000 dinars ($172,803) from the Bahraini Saudi Bank branch in Muharraq on Thursday evening. The robber entered the bank at around 5.55 p.m., five minutes before closing time, and threatened the female branch manager and a male employee with a knife. He tied up the male employee and forced the woman to lock the door before he opened the safe, took the money and got away in the woman’s black Dodge car. Sources said the robber was wearing a white thobe and had blackened his face. He was described as being of medium built, fair, with a thin beard, and speaking in a Shami (Eastern Mediterranean Arabic) accent.
A Paleo?
Police units were deployed to various road intersections in Muharraq and other parts of the country to locate the stolen car. It was eventually found near a hotel in Manama. Governor of the Bahrain Monetary Agency Sheikh Ahmed ibn Mohammed Al-Khalifa, who visited the bank, said a meeting would be held with top bank executives to review security standards.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:36 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Im thinkin about a Blog book for childrens, called Go Fred Go

How much for a kddie illustratiation book Lucky?
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 13:02 Comments || Top||

#2  Fred, are you all right?
Posted by: Dave D. || 04/11/2004 13:13 Comments || Top||

#3  Bahrain is an island. A tiny one. Unless the Branch Mgr is a twit incapable of giving a good description, they should be able catch him with little trouble. No cameras in Bahraini banks, eh? Hmmmm.....
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 14:30 Comments || Top||


Second Shooting Incident Baffles Investigators
The second shooting incident in Jeddah within a week, which claimed the life of another young police officer, has baffled investigators. Ahmad Rajeh Al-Asafi, 30, was shot and killed Friday afternoon while questioning two men whose car he had stopped on Macarona Street. According to a report published in Al-Madinah newspaper, Al-Asafi was questioning the driver of the car when one of the passengers walked up to him, pulled out a gun and shot him in the head, killing him instantly. The men then made their escape. When police arrived, they found the officer lying in a pool of blood. According to eyewitnesses, the police officer was pronounced dead at the scene before the ambulance arrived. The body was transported to King Fahd Hospital. Eyewitnesses said that there were three passengers inside the car. “They fired at the police officer because they were afraid they might get arrested,” one man told Arab News.
Golly. Y'think? Now, if they're crooks, they'll get killed themselves. Or if they're terrs, they'll get a good talking-to by their imam, and you know how that hurts.
Jeddah police chief Saleh Al-Olayan, who is supervising the investigation, told Al-Madinah: “We have collected enough evidence from the scene to allow us to begin our investigation. We will not rest until the men who committed this terrible crime are found.” Police investigators at the scene retrieved the Saudi identification cards of the suspects from the dead police officer’s car as well as a can of soda believed to belong to one of the suspects.
Well, their ID cards would certainly seem to be the place to start...
In a similar incident in Jeddah’s Al-Bawadi district on Monday another police officer was killed. In that incident, a plainclothes officer was questioning a suspect outside a small cafeteria when a second man walked up and shot the policeman in the chest and shoulders killing him instantly. Both suspects managed to escape. Police would not comment on whether the incidents are related.
My guess would be that they are...
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:27 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Police investigators at the scene retrieved the Saudi identification cards of the suspects

Did they also retrieve their Yemeni, Syrian, Algerian, and Belgian ID cards?
Posted by: Seafarious || 04/11/2004 19:23 Comments || Top||

#2  Methinks they weren't ordinary crooks. Can you say the "T" word, boys and girls?

I knew you could.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 04/11/2004 19:59 Comments || Top||


Britain
Hurd Blasts Mistaken US Policy in Iraq
Former British Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd yesterday sharply criticized Washington’s policy in Iraq, saying the United States was mistaken in believing it could impose democracy on the war-shattered country through the use of force. “You really don’t win hearts and minds by filling hospitals and mortuaries,” said Hurd, who was foreign secretary between 1989 and 1995 in the Conservative government of Margaret Thatcher.
You don't have to, Doug. You fill the hospitals and mortuaries with Bad Guys. Everybody left standing is eligible to vote. Pretty simplisme, huh?
Hurd was referring to the recent fighting in Iraq between US forces and hard-line Sunni and Shiite Muslims that has left hundreds of Iraqis dead and hundreds more wounded.
Did he mention anything about them setting fire to people? Mutilating corpses? That sort of thing?
Hurd told BBC radio that the recent upsurge in violence was “almost inevitable” and added that the US-led coalition should hand over power to Iraqis who have real influence in the country and not just those who have “curried favor” with the Pentagon.
Personally, I think we should have installed a latter-day McArthur to rule with an iron hand until the locals catch on. I think Saddoun Hammadi and Baghdad Bob should both be well on the way to decomposition by now, along with hundreds of others who seem to have been released on their own recognizance.
Hurd also criticized Britain’s close support for the US administration over Iraq and urged Prime Minister Tony Blair to send an envoy to Baghdad to explain his government’s position.
Good idea. Send somebody to talk.
Meanwhile British Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon defended government policy, saying life had become much better in Iraq a year after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, despite current violence. There was a “sense of real tangible progress in the country,” he told the BBC.
There's just a bunch of bad hats trying to obliterate it at the moment.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:32 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Caribbean-Latin America
U.S. Troops in Haiti Hampered by Mandate
They pick up trash, patrol streets and search for weapons — all the time counting the days before their tour ends. Six weeks into a mission to stabilize Haiti for a second time in a decade, U.S. troops are hampered by a 90-day mandate that leaves little time to accomplish any meaningful change, and by hostility that is a far cry from the joyous welcome the Americans got in 1994. "I don't think three months is going to change much," said U.S. Marine Staff Sgt. John Schultz, 34, of Hammond, Ind.
200 years hasn't changed much. What's three months gonna do?
Still, he finds Haiti a respite from Iraq: "I've been there twice, and each time I hope will be the last." Haiti's crisis comes at a bad time for the Bush administration, which is trying to fill a power vacuum left by ousted President Jean-Bertrand Aristide while coping with mounting casualties in Iraq. Secretary of State Colin Powell visited last week and pledged U.S. support, but said the administration will not spend more than the $55 million earmarked for Haiti — about $20 million less than last year and a fraction of the $235 million that flowed months after the 1994 intervention.
That's because it's like tossing it down the toilet. $55 million is a lot of cases of beer, even if you buy the good stuff.
Less money means less chance of getting guns off the street, though everyone agrees that is the only way to secure the Caribbean country. Since the first U.S. Marines arrived Feb. 29, fewer than 150 weapons have been collected and rival street gangs and rebel groups remain armed. There's no buyback program to entice citizens into turning in their guns. The streets are patrolled by 3,600 soldiers and marines — more than half of them Americans, the rest Chileans, Canadians and French. The primary goal is to bring order before a U.N. force takes over in June. At least 300 people were killed in the rebellion that erupted Feb. 5 and ended with the Feb. 29 overthrow of Aristide, who is now in neighboring Jamaica. The Americans arrived as Aristide supporters bewildered by his departure set up flaming roadblocks, robbed, killed and looted.
That's usually what I do when confronted with a flaming roadblock, too...
While a semblance of order has returned to the cities, many provincial towns controlled by rival gangs or rebels sporadically erupt. Early on, U.S. troops shot and killed six Haitians they said either fired on them or tried to run roadblocks. Haitians accuse the Americans of being trigger-happy and note French troops have not once fired or been fired at.
Ummm... Cause? Effect? If they'd shot at the Frenchies, do they think they might have possibly fired back?
Also, Haiti is a former French colony and its Creole language is close to French.
Perhaps it should go back to being a French colony, and then we wouldn't have to do this every ten or fifteen years?
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:24 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


China-Japan-Koreas
Co-pilot of Nagasaki bomb plane dies
Fred Olivi, who copiloted the plane that dropped the atomic bomb on Nagasaki, has died. He was 82. Olivi, a native of Chicago, died Thursday at a rehabilitation center in a Chicago suburb, officials at Panozzo Bros. funeral home said Saturday. He suffered a stroke in August. The crew of the Enola Gay dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima. Three days later, on August 9, 1945, the crew of the B-29 bomber nicknamed Bockscar dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki. Japan surrendered six days later, ending World War II.
I cannot thank these men enough for saving so many American and Japanese lives alike. America has lost one of its true heroes. The Nagasaki raid put paid to all the Mitsubishi torpedoes that sank our ships at Pearl.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/11/2004 4:49:25 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Sasol, China talk synthetic fuel
At least the Chinese get it.
Sasol, the world’s largest producer of synthetic fuels from coal, was in talks with the Shenhua Group, China’s largest coal mining company, about building a plant there, the company said yesterday. Sasol’s spokesperson Johann van Rheede confirmed that the two companies were "in exploratory talks" but these were still at a very early stage and feasibility studies had not even been done yet. Wen Xinsheng, the deputy general manager with Beijing-based Shenhua’s coal-to-oil unit, said Shenhua was interested in setting up a 30 billion yuan plant with Sasol to convert coal to petrol and diesel. The first phase of the plant was projected to have a capacity of 3 million tons of motor fuel a year, Wen said. China is the world’s largest coal miner and consumer, and has encouraged experiments in turning it to oil in an effort to help reduce its reliance on imported fuel from the Middle East. Shenhua planned to increase the investment to 100 billion yuan by 2020, by which time the project would have annual capacity of 10 million tons of motor fuel, said Wen. Shenhua would increase investment to 300 billion yuan thereafter, Wen said. He said no decision had been made on financing the project.
Another report says the cost is USD10 per barrel which is inline with other sources I have seen and about the same as Synoil from the Alberta oilsands. Yes folks you can have unlimited supplies of oil at ten dollars a barrel. So why isn’t it happening. The problem is not technology. The South Africans have been doing this for over 20 years. The problem is risk. Combined with NIMBY. These plants cost billions to tens of billions of dollars and are big and dirty. The government has to take on the risk by commiting to buy synthetic oil on long term contracts at fixed prices. Either oil prices stay high and the government makes a truly massive profit, or oil prices fall dramatically, and the government looses a lot of money, but you are no longer dependent on ME oil. BTW I have been going on about this for years.
Posted by: Phil B || 04/11/2004 3:29:27 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Um, Phil, just to point out here...thats 10 bucks per barrel AFTER you buy the barrel of oil (so in essence approximately 25-30 dollars per barrel of oil currently + 10 to convert to synth oil depending on how refined the oil/crude is). Now thats IMPORTS. If you are using your own national sources then 8 dollars per barrel is when it becomes profitable...even 9 or 10 dollars is too much. Most of this has to do with terms of drilling and pumping it over to its destination. When ya throw in synth oil conversion then it jumps the price closer to $20 bucks per barrel. At those prices you're got a better chance to strike a deal with a gulf country for a bulk purchase of oil and reduced prices.
Posted by: Valentine || 04/11/2004 3:49 Comments || Top||

#2  sorry Valentine I didn't understand your comment. SASOL turns coal into gas and then into petroleum products. There is no crude oil used in the process.
Posted by: Phil B || 04/11/2004 4:33 Comments || Top||

#3  Why would you need to convert crude oil to sythetic fuel.Deffinatly talking coal to syn-fuel.
Posted by: Anonymous4110 || 04/11/2004 7:38 Comments || Top||

#4  It would be better to force the big 3 automatkers to disgorge the secrets of the fabulous fish carbureator.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 8:04 Comments || Top||

#5  From '79 to '83 I worked for Exxon Research in Texas. At that time they had working pilot plants for both liquefaction and gasification of coal. Once our friends the Saudis saw that we were serious about synfuels, they immediately moved to pump more oil and lower prices. For as long as they can, they will keep the price of oil just low enough to make synfuels un-economic.
Posted by: PBMcL || 04/11/2004 12:17 Comments || Top||

#6  PBMcL: From '79 to '83 I worked for Exxon Research in Texas. At that time they had working pilot plants for both liquefaction and gasification of coal.

A process has existed for at least 60 years. The Germans were using a similar process during the war. Then Allied warplanes took out their plants and that was it for the German war effort. By keeping oil prices high, OPEC is playing with fire - we have alternatives, and they're getting cheaper every day.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 04/11/2004 13:32 Comments || Top||

#7  ZF- by '79 the processes had been improved, and no doubt today they could be better still. But building the plants is still extremely capital-intensive and time-consuming. As mentioned above, investors would require price guarantees before risking billions of $.
Posted by: PBMcL || 04/11/2004 13:54 Comments || Top||

#8  There is a coal gasification plant in Indiana and one in North Dakota. The one in North Dakota takes coal directly from the mine via conveyor belts. It also smells awful depending on wind direction. The one in Indiana does not. Population centers are too close to get away with that.
Posted by: Zpaz || 04/11/2004 14:08 Comments || Top||

#9  I should add the Dakota plant makes other products. I don't know if the smell is due to gasification or not.
Posted by: Zpaz || 04/11/2004 14:11 Comments || Top||

#10  Oopsy my mistake..thats what I get for writing at 4 in the friggin morning lol. What I was trying to say had my head been clear is that to compete with home drilled oil the usual price (at least in the US) is about $8 per barrel so in essence the costs to make a barrel of oil/synthoil needs to be lower than that or very close to the same cost. Anything more expensive than that and it becomes hard to compete with home drilled oil sources, against imports its competable unless the purchase of the imports is in large bulk. Much of the reason the canadian oil sands has dropped to $10 per barrel and still dropping is that the government for a long time took the risk as you said of subsidizing the industry with a view towards long terms profits paying off.

Now I'm not saying the process is bad, its just pretty expensive in the short run is all until you get the plants up and working full blast.
Posted by: Valentine || 04/11/2004 16:07 Comments || Top||

#11  Right. No one in the US would dare try to make money off a nearly unlimited fuel source because it is capital intensive.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 17:28 Comments || Top||

#12  Ship - Now, now - the article is using the modern American farming model - y'know, tractors and combines and shit. If you employed the far less expensive ancient Saudi Arabian model and imported a shitload of Pakistanis, worked them half to death in 130 degF, housed them in tin sheds, clothed them in $3 jumpsuits available used in "Taliban Alley" in Al Khobar, and fed them table scraps - I'm sure the numbers would jibe. That's the model they apply to all works requiring physical labor. I always found the army of Pakistanis who walked the miles and miles of highway alongside the tanker trucks watering the scraggly trees that were planted in the divide of freeways the King traveled to be a particularly educational sight. We mustn't become hide-bound - we should be open to "new" possibilities, no? Heh. ;->
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 17:43 Comments || Top||


Down Under
Land of Oz: Govt asked me to lie: sacked defence adviser
A senior Defence Department adviser says she lost her job because she refused to write a briefing paper, which she says would have lied about the threat posed by Iraq's weapons programs. Jane Errey was a senior adviser with the Defence Science and Technology Organisation until she was sacked last week.
"No, no! I shan't write it!"
"Then pack it up and get out! Yer fired!"
She has previously stood as a candidate for the Australian Democrats in the ACT.
... but has no ax to grind.
Ms Errey says the Defence Department asked her to write a briefing paper claiming Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, but that was not backed up by intelligence material she had seen. "I believe I was being asked, as was the rest of the department at that time, to perpetuate the lie that the Government was putting forward in so far as the weapons of mass destruction existed and that they were a grave threat to the rest of the world," Ms Errey said.
"I could not do that, because I am pure! And simple!"
But the acting secretary of the Defence Department, Alan Henderson, says Ms Errey was sacked because she did not return to work after taking leave. Mr Henderson rejects her claim that she lost her job because of her views on the Iraq war. "It is a coincidence," he said. "We have shown consideration towards her position in relation to Iraq but at the end of the day you have to turn up and do a day's work or account for the reasons why you won't turn up."
That's the way it works at my job, but then I don't work for the gummint anymore...
Yesterday, Defence Minister Robert Hill has rejected the claims. "Basically it's a management issue, it's got nothing to do with any briefs that she may have written or was going to write in the past," Senator Hill said. Democrats leader Andrew Bartlett says it is a very serious claim and he is calling the wounded to be shot for an investigation.
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 19:38 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  hmmm I still work for the gubbmint, and we still fire those who don't return to their jobs. wonder why that is....guess it's an ideological taint?
Posted by: Frank G || 04/11/2004 20:21 Comments || Top||


An uneasy truce
Bolt is the Man
After many disputes, Andrew Bolt and prominent Muslim Salah Salman decided to talk. Neither was totally reassured.

I WORRY what Muslim leaders here teach -- not least to their children -- about politics, Jews and violence. But Dr Salah Salman, the Egyptian-born head of Coburg’s King Khalid Islamic College, worries that what I write about Muslims is unfair and hate-filled. His views on Islam in Australia are important, because no Muslim leader has had so much sway over so many of our young Muslims. He helped set up his school -- Australia’s first and best Islamic college -- two decades ago, and now teaches 1200 students. So we met at King Khalid, its walls covered with vivid student art and posters calling for tolerance, and talked frankly about what bothers us. We hoped to explain away false or scary notions of each other, and thought that from this edited transcript you, too, might learn something useful. We parted all smiles, although I doubt I reassured Salman much. Him I found charming, informed and eloquent, yet not quite as reassuring as I’d hoped, either. Maybe what still divides us isn’t ignorance, but something more stubborn. See what you think.
BOLT: I’m talking to you as probably our most influential Muslim educator. And you’re speaking to someone widely regarded by Muslim spokesmen as . . .
SALMAN: A Muslim basher.

BOLT: One thing concerning me is there’s nearly half a dozen Muslim schools and some state schools with many Muslim students, and the results overall aren’t good. And I worry there’s no strategy to better equip those students to integrate.
SALMAN : But if you relate that heavily to Islam, is not that a little biased?

This invites speculation that Muslims are failures. But it is true schools with many Muslims tend to have bad VCE results. Although you say that in one school, yours, these VCE results do not give the full picture.
Right. Last year we had 18 of our students doing the International Baccalaureate instead, and only 21 doing VCE. The IB students had high results, so to say this school is not performing is not right.

Number two point is that the ENTER score of a school is a better indicator of school performance than the VCE, and we’ve done well. Also look at how VCE results are then scaled to get the final ENTER marks. If you get a mark of 40 in Arabic, it’s reduced by a couple of marks for the ENTER score. But look at Hebrew -- if a student gets 40, the mark is scaled up to 51.

We’ve often heard of Saudi Arabia exporting its extremist Wahhabist ideology. Do you accept that’s a wide concern?
Not in Western societies, but in themselves possibly yes. But take my word, this school was started in 1983 with $340,000 from the Saudi King purely as a one-off, and never ever at any stage have they interfered here.

The Saudi Government also gave the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils $1.2 million for schools, plus the right to certify meat as halal and raise money. AFIC also helped to establish your college. What is your connection now?
We’ve had to sever relations. They tended to interfere, and I am determined not to let any pressure group interfere with the school, and to make sure there was no influence from any other country.

What sort of Islam are you teaching here?
Sunni is the main Muslim religion, and this is a Sunni school. We believe Islam is moderation and peace.

Yet the AFIC, which helped to start your school, appointed as Mufti of Australia Sheik Taj El-Din El-Hilali, who praised suicide bombers and called the September 11 attack on America "God’s work against oppressors". He was appointed with the support even of the Islamic Council of Victoria, whose head is your school’s public relations official.
You’ve got it wrong. This Mufti is able to give his opinion on religious matters, but he’s used his position to make political opinion, which is not allowed. In religion the man has his credentials and no one disputes that. But politically he is naive, sometimes.

He’s worse than naive.
But look, you always advocate free speech.

Free speech comes with a duty to fight bad speech, Salman. In most articles I say people like Hilali, who praise suicide bombers, don’t represent most Muslims. But what worries me is how few Muslim leaders say the same publicly.
No leader in any of the states support what happened on September 11. For me this is not an issue of religion. This is about criminality. No one can defend it.

But some do.
Andrew, Islam is different to Christianity and Judaism in one way, in that we don’t have a priesthood. Everyone is equal, with an equal right to speak. He is an individual -- if he is right, he is right.

So when you hear Sheik Hilali praising children who die fighting Israelis and saying September 11 is "God’s work against oppressors", how do you react as a Muslim and an educator?
You have to be broad minded, Andrew, and you cannot look from one eye only. First of all, we are involved with a Jewish school in a harmony project. But if America is really sincere in this matter (of Israel), there will not be a problem. This must be solved. The hatred comes from that.

How do your students react to stories which appear almost weekly about Islamist terrorists who blow up trains and buildings?
Very bad. Those who do this are criminal and they should not identify as Muslims. These ones in Spain are Moroccans, and had nothing to do with Islam. The Koran says do not kill.

But the Koran also says oppressors must be fought. And some may say that I oppress Muslims and . . .
But fought how? To fight here has a different meaning, doesn’t it?

I don’t know. I hope so. Would you also condemn suicide bombings in Israel?
To condemn -- the word is too hard. Are you able to condemn the (Israeli) Apache helicopter killing people? If they kill innocent people, I condemn them. If they kill military, I don’t.

What do you teach about Israel?
We refer to Jews as our cousins.

But you employ as an English teacher Nigel Jackson, who says the Holocaust is a "myth", or he doesn’t believe it, and rages about the "Zionist lobby".
This guy, whatever his political point of view, is a very sensitive, excellent teacher. He never, never raises these subjects at school, and that is a condition of his employment. You can’t really gag people.

What kind of citizens do you hope to produce?
We want them to be productive Australian citizens with good Islamic values.

Would good Muslims here believe that an Australian government to be fully legitimate must be Muslim?
You’re talking about a particular sect of Islam, the Shia. But a government can be legitimate as long as it observes the guidelines of the Muslim religion -- do the right and don’t do the wrong. But as a citizen of a country you must follow the law, that is the Islamic way.

It’s interesting how many prominent converts you get. Peter Barnett, former head of Radio Australia, is a convert, as are spokesmen of the Islamic Council and the Muslim Public Affairs Committee. What is driving this?
Seeing that Islam is a good alternative, simple as that. If you listen to the British journalist who came here last month (as a guest of Monash University), Yvonne Ridley, about what made her convert, she read the Koran for herself.

Ridley? She went to Afghanistan under the Taliban (who jailed her) and thought this was good.
Andrew, she promised them to read the Koran, and that was the only thing. She said the Taliban were naive and not good, but she read the Koran.

But Ridley this year said killing Israeli children was legitimate because they’d grow up to be soldiers.
Killing civilian children is out of bounds.

Yet she came to your school.
But said nothing about killing. Our question to her was: Why did you convert?

But can’t you see how it looks that someone who has endorsed the killing of Israeli children and endorsed suicide bombing comes here to address students?
Why do you take this line? You never condemn targeted killing by Israelis or the bulldozing of houses with women and children inside. Or the targeting of one terrorist, with the killing of 20 innocents around him. Why don’t you try to see both sides? You never criticise anti-Muslims.

I do. I’ve condemned attacks on mosques here.
If you work in education, you don’t meddle in politics because it damages your school. Politics is a very dangerous area. But what I’m really against is that although there’s a lot of people implicated (in extremism), they shouldn’t be taken as homogenous representations of Islam. That’s the thing I am really against.
Posted by: tipper || 04/11/2004 9:53:06 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Is this as good as "moderate" Islam gets? There is very little he says that makes me feel much more comfortable. He lies about bulldozing houses with women and children in them, excuses the radicals by saying that all voices get heard in Islam, denies responsibility to even try to throttle the Jihadis, and his smooth line about obeying the laws of the country just make me think he is biding his time until he can get those laws changed to sharia.

If moderate Muslim leaders like this guy cannot throttle the extremists, the West will be forced to do it for them, and no one will be overjoyed at the aftermath.
Posted by: Craig || 04/11/2004 10:32 Comments || Top||

#2  Andrew Bolt is the smartest polical commentator in Australia.
Posted by: Phil B || 04/11/2004 10:38 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Politix
Text of Bush's Aug. 6, 2001, Intel Brief
Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate (Osama) Bin Laden since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the US. Bin Laden implied in US television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef and "bring the fighting to America".

After US missile strikes on his base in Afghanistan in 1998, Bin Laden told followers he wanted to retaliate in Washington, according to a ...(edited)... service.

An Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ) operative told a ... (edited) ... service at the same time that Bin Laden was planning to exploit the operative's access to the US to mount a terrorist strike.

The millennium plotting in Canada in 1999 may have been part of Bin Laden's first serious attempt to implement a terrorist strike in the US.

Convicted plotter Ahmed Ressam has told the FBI that he conceived the idea to attack Los Angeles International Airport himself, but that Bin Laden lieutenant Abu Zubaydah encouraged him and helped facilitate the operation.

Ressam also said that in 1998 Abu Zubaydah was planning his own US attack.

Ressam says Bin Laden was aware of the Los Angeles operation.

Although Bin Laden has not succeeded, his attacks against the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 demonstrate that he prepares operations years in advance and is not deterred by setbacks.

Bin Laden associates surveilled our embassies in Nairobi and Dar-es-Salaam as early as 1993, and some members of the Nairobi cell planning the bombings were arrested and deported in 1997.

Al-Qaeda members - including some who are US citizens - have resided in or travelled to the US for years, and the group apparently maintains a support structure that could aid attacks.

Two al-Qaeda members found guilty in the conspiracy to bomb our embassies in East Africa were US citizens, and a senior EIJ member lived in California in the mid-1990s.

A clandestine source said in 1998 that a Bin Laden cell in New York was recruiting Muslim-American youth for attacks.

We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a ... (edited)... service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a US aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Sheikh" Omar Abdel Rahman and other US-held extremists.

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.

The FBI is conducting approximately 70 full field investigations throughout the US that it considers Bin Laden-related.

The CIA and the FBI are investigating a call to our embassy in the United Arab Emirates in May saying that a group of Bin Laden supporters was in the US planning attacks with explosives.
Posted by: Steve White || 04/11/2004 12:53:50 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Home Front: WoT
Bush's Pre-9/11 al-Qaida Memo Released
President Bush was told more than a month before the Sept. 11 attacks that al-Qaida had reached America's shores, had a support system in place for its operatives and that the FBI had detected suspicious activity that might involve a hijacking plot. Since 1998, the FBI had observed "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks," according to a memo prepared for Bush and declassified Saturday. White House aides and outside experts said they could not recall a sitting president ever publicly releasing the highly sensitive document, known as a PDB, for presidential daily briefing.
Not that GWB will get any credit for being forthcoming.
The Aug. 6, 2001 PDB referred to evidence of buildings in New York possibly being cased by terrorists. The document also said the CIA and FBI were investigating a call to the U.S. embassy in the United Arab Emirates in May 2001 "saying that a group of (Osama) bin Laden supporters was in the U.S. planning attacks with explosives." The commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks asked the White House to declassify the document at its meeting Thursday. It is significant because Bush read it, so it offers a window on what Bush and his top aides knew about the threat of a terrorist strike. The PDB made plain that bin Laden had been scheming to strike the United States for at least six years. It warned of indications from a broad array of sources, spanning several years. Democratic and Republican members of the 9-11 commission saw the document differently.
Natch.
Democratic commissioner Bob Kerrey, a former senator from Nebraska, said the memo's details should have given Bush enough warning to push for more intelligence information about possible domestic hijackings. "The whole argument the government used that we were focusing overseas, that we thought the attack was coming from outside the United States - this memo said an attack could come in the United States. And we didn't scramble our agencies to that," he said.
And if we had?
I hope Kerrey has the grace to feel foolish with the actual text of the memo released. I doubt if he will, though. Partisans aren't big on feeling foolish.
Richard Ben-Veniste, a Democratic commissioner and former Watergate prosecutor, said the memo calls into question national security adviser Condoleezza Rice's assertion Thursday that the memo was purely a "historical" document. "This is a provocative piece of information and warrants further exploration as to what was done following the receipt of this information to enhance our domestic security," he said.
There's a legal concept that's called the "reasonable man" standard, or it was called that before things got PC. It's probably a "reasonable person" standard now. To my mind, a "reasonable person" wouldn't have had basis for decisive actions based on the content of the memo. But then, at one point a court decided that a "reasonable man" when driving across a set of railroad tracks would stop his Huppmobile, get out, and look both ways down the track to make sure the Old 97 wasn't barrelling down upon him before crossing, so what the hell do I know?
Republican commissioner James R. Thompson, a former Illinois governor, said the memo "didn't call for anything to be done" by Bush. The memo's details confirm that the Bush administration had no specific information regarding an imminent attack involving airplanes as missiles, Thompson said. "The PDB backs up what Dr. Rice testified to. There is no smoking gun, not even a cold gun," he said.
That's what I get out of it, too, but then, I'm probably not being reasonable...
"Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate bin Laden since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the U.S.," the memo to Bush stated. Bin Laden implied in U.S. television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef and "bring the fighting to America." After President Clinton launched missile strikes on bin Laden's base in Afghanistan in 1998 in retaliation for bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed 231 people, "bin Laden told followers he wanted to retaliate in Washington," the memo said.
And the intel community was probably expecting attacks on the same order, by similar means...
Other than our saintly, heroic FBI agent in Minnesota who knew the whole plot of course, just ask her.
The memo cited intelligence from other countries in three instances, but the White House blacked out the names of the nations. Efforts to launch an attack from Canada around the time of millennium celebrations in 2000 "may have been part of bin Laden's first serious attempt to implement a terrorist strike in the U.S.," the document stated. Convicted plotter Ahmed Ressam, who was caught trying to cross the Canadian border with explosives about 60 miles north of Seattle in late 1999, told the FBI that he alone conceived an attack on Los Angeles International Airport, but that bin Laden lieutenant Abu Zubaydah "encouraged him and helped facilitate the operation," the document said. Ressam is still awaiting sentencing after agreeing to testify in other terrorism cases. Zubaydah was a senior al-Qaida planner who was captured in Pakistan in March 2002. Al-Qaida members, some of them American citizens, had lived in or traveled to the United States for years, the memo said. "The group apparently maintains a support structure that could aid attacks," it warned.
... and the FBI's been working on breaking them since 9-11, and before...
The document said that "some of the more sensational threat reporting" - such as an intelligence tip in 1998 that bin Laden wanted to hijack aircraft to win the release of fellow extremists - could not be corroborated.
To me, that implies something along the lines of the Air India hijacking to Kandahar that got Omar Saeed Sheikh sprung...
One item in the memo referred to "recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."
WTC wasn't a federal building, was it?
A White House official speaking on condition of anonymity said that was a reference to two Yemeni men the FBI interviewed and concluded were simply tourists taking photographs. On May 15, 2001, a caller to the U.S. embassy in the United Arab Emirates warned of planned bin Laden attacks with explosives in the United States, but did not say where or when. The CIA reported the incident to other government officials the next day, and a dozen or more steps were taken by the CIA and other agencies "to run down" the information from the phone call, senior administration officials said Saturday evening. One official said references to al-Qaida in prior presidential briefings "would indicate 'they are here, they are there' in various countries and the CIA director would tell the president what was being done to address "these different operations."
Lots of flotsam in the sea of data; nothing there that would allow anyone -- anyone -- the ability to say, "ya know, we'd better be on guard for some commercial airline hijackings in early September."
Posted by: Steve White || 04/11/2004 12:19:17 AM || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "The whole argument the government used that we were focusing overseas, that we thought the attack was coming from outside the United States - this memo said an attack could come in the United States"

The arguments of the Democrats against GW have become like those of a shrewish wife. No substance to the nagging...just nag nag nag.

It's not to say that the Dems aren't effective. The Dem's, like shrew wives, can get their friends to sit around and have endless hours of fun berating just how stupid he is......Like, last time he tried to hail a cab, he was ignored because, like I told him , he should have done it from the corner, not the middle of the sidewalk!!! I told him so!! And last time he was in Starbucks...he ordered a "large" instead of a "grande"!!!!

The Dem's have become completely void of their own substance and now are reduced to the divisive politics of nothing more than nag..nag..nag.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 6:16 Comments || Top||

#2  This article typifies the kind of slyly dishonest reporting that convinced me the mainstream press is little more than a wholly-owned propaganda outlet for the Democratic Party: some asshole at AP really had to work hard to transmogrify that vague, useless memo into this "Bush Knew About 9/11 In Advance!!" story.

And just exactly what is it that Bush "should" have done in the 36 days that elapsed between the time he saw this potpourri of generalities, rumors and mostly "uncorroborated" miscellaneous intelligence tidbits, and the morning of September 11?

Was Bush supposed to immediately arrest and detain, without charge, all aliens of Middle Eastern origin in the United States at that moment on suspicion they might be plotting terrorist attacks? That's about what it would have taken to nab the 9/11 hijackers before they did the deed-- and under the laws in effect at the time, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY ILLEGAL FOR HIM TO DO SO. The din of outrage from the American Civil Liberties Union would have been so loud that it would have left every one of us suffering from permanent hearing loss.

Or was Bush supposed to immediately launch an all-out assault on Afghanistan to destroy al Qaeda without even seeking a U.N. resolution? Was he supposed to do it without congressional authorization, which is required by law? That's what he would have had to do; and had he done that, he would have been impeached at once and removed from office before the year was out.

And why, if "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks" were observed by the FBI all the way back since 1998, is this supposed to be Bush's failing, that not enough was done to thwart those plans? He wasn't president in 1998, Bill Clinton was.

But Clinton's a Democrat, so he doesn't even get mentioned in this disingenuous concoction of partisan bullshit.

9/11 happened because for at least the last quarter-century, this ENTIRE COUNTRY refused to acknowledge what the Islamicists themselves had been telling us, again and again: THEY ARE AT WAR WITH US. Again and again they attacked us throughout the 1980's and 1990's; yet we kept dismissing them as a ragtag band of disgruntled kooks.

Whatever oversight kept us from shortstopping the 9/11 attacks, it is the fault of every U.S. president from Carter on; every member of the House and Senate since 1979; and of every last U.S. citizen for not DEMANDING that our government take the problem seriously.

Blame it on George Bush? Screw you, John Kerry.

(sorry for the caps lock; I'm pissed off)
Posted by: Dave D. || 04/11/2004 8:45 Comments || Top||

#3  I believe extreme liberals in certain media venues are taking an active part in trying to lay all the blame for the 9/11 attacks on the Bush Administration. On Thursday on NPR's Fresh Air Terry Gross said "As we all know the 9/11 Commision was formed to find out what the Bush Administration knew prior to the 9/11 attacks." I guess I shouldn't have been surprised by the blatant untruth of this statement considering the complete free pass she gave Dick Clarke. It seems NPR does have a political agenda.
Posted by: Deacon Blues || 04/11/2004 9:48 Comments || Top||

#4  I moved the original memo to Home Front - Politix, which is probably also where this belongs. None of this puffing and blowing actually has anything to do with actually pursuing the war on terror. 50 years from now, this won't even be a footnote in the history books. Assuming they're written in English.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 10:52 Comments || Top||

#5  Yikes Fred! It's Easter! We'll win, it might take awhile tho.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 11:25 Comments || Top||

#6  We almost certainly will win, provided the Democrats' cries of "Iraq is Bush's Vietnam!!" don't become self-fullfilling prophecies.

Frankly, I'm not a thousandth as alarmed by ANYTHING happening in Iraq right now as I am about the utter treachery of the Democrats: they seem perfectly willing to engineer a national disaster in the form of the complete failure of the war against Islamofascism, if only it will help them win this next presidential election.

I guaran-damn-tee you: not a single one of the Democrats mouthing off these days--NOT EVEN ONE--actually believes so much as a single word of the doom-and-gloom crap they've been spewing out (well, maybe poor little Dennis Kucinich believes it, along with Ralph Nader). Every last one of them knows precisely WHY we're in Iraq, knows that we're succeeding, and knows that Iraq is the key to cutting through the Gordian Knot of Islamic lunacy. Every last one of them.

The Democrats made a cynical, calculated choice, back during the primaries, to take a position opposed to everything we are doing in Iraq. They did it because they saw the potential in that huge crowd of foamers and droolers that Howard Dean whipped up into a lather, and with the sole exception of Joe Lieberman, none of them had the integrity to resist tapping into the electoral energy of that madness.

And now they're riding the tiger and can't get off.

Some have said that if Kerry wins, he'll actually continue virtually all of Bush's policies in the War On Terror; that having him as President won't be that bad, after all.

Bullshit.

If Kerry wins, he will be under relentless pressure from the Left to pull out of Iraq and suspend nearly everything we've been doing to prevent further terrorist attacks, and focus instead on kissing Kofi Annan's and Jacques Chirac's asses. And he will NOT be able to resist that pressure, because the tiger isn't going to turn into a pussycat.

"50 years from now, this won't even be a footnote in the history books."

It will be a helluva lot more than a footnote in the history books if the Left wins this round: it'll be an entire chapter. In their view, this August 6th memo is a bigger scandal than Watergate.
Posted by: Dave D. || 04/11/2004 12:37 Comments || Top||

#7  Damn, your harshing my mellow Dave D.

Agreed on many points. If as you say a Kerry term plays out with a quick withdrawl from Iraq, the happy times will last one election cycle, then three attacks and.... for the Muslims... the deluge.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 13:14 Comments || Top||

#8  Yeah, that's the way I see it, too: giving up on Iraq will guarantee more terrorist attacks, since the jihadis will inevitably view it as Mogadishu writ large. And more terrorist attacks will leave any American president--Democrat or Republican--with no way out: he can't countenance toleration of the attacks as "just the cost of doing business with the rest of the world," nor could he consider a reprise of Bush's "Arab Democracy Experiment," and the only option left to him would be all-out, total war against the Arab--and possibly the entire Islamic--world.

But at least that war would only take about twenty minutes.
Posted by: Dave D. || 04/11/2004 13:48 Comments || Top||

#9  While I think a Kerry win would cost countless American lives and be a huge set back in the WOT - I think that it would cause such a major backlash in the subsequent election and that it will become a dark day for the Islamofacists and for the world in general.

Right now we are restrained. Allow Kerry to diddle and Americans to die, and no amount of propaganda will contain the wrath.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 16:13 Comments || Top||

#10  I'll even go further ...I predict that if Kerry wins...and AQ strikes our shores...Kerry's fate will be like that of Davis.

I can see the possibility of a Kerry win. But he will be less popular than Nixon or Davis and my guess...make that prediction... is that he will suffer the same fate. Clinton just barely escaped it. The moment the left rids itself of the GW Satan, Kerry is a twit who will be hated by all.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 16:17 Comments || Top||

#11  Have to agree with fmr governer J. Thompson. There's no gun there smoking or otherwise. People should realize that had any of the hijackers been arrested prior to 9/11 the ACLU would have had them released the next day. Ashcroft's head would have been called for. Meanwhile, at the Detroit ranch new passports would have been issued and the game resumed. Same result. I don't think 9/11 could have been prevented simply because of the self applied handcuffs. Chine
Posted by: Chiner || 04/11/2004 16:58 Comments || Top||

#12  The moment the left rids itself of the GW Satan, Kerry is a twit who will be hated by all.

Yep, what I was trying to think.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 17:37 Comments || Top||


International-UN-NGOs
Pope: Love must defeat terrorism
Pope John Paul told the world in his Easter message Sunday that a culture of love had to defeat terrorism and the "logic of death" and revenge in Iraq, the Holy Land and other places where conflict reigns. "May the culture of life and love render vain the logic of death," the 83-year-old pope declared to thousands of pilgrims in St Peter’s Square, Rome, and to millions watching on TV.
Yeah, sure. Peace in our time. I get the message. If we were dealing with rational human beings, this much vaunted "love" approach might have a snowball’s chance in Hell.

Instead, we’re fighting fanatics who have intentionally had all fear of death bred out of them, so that any humanity shown their type can be easily turned against those stupid enough to do so. "Love" might be able to defeat terrorism after a few million years, but I’m not prepared to sit around and wait for the first biochem or nuclear terror attacks to happen. Bullets defeat terrorism a lot more quickly.

A standing threat to begin contaminating or leveling Islam’s most holy shrines in response to major terror attacks is the only long term strategy I’ve seen yet that will truly hobble Islamist terror. Until we have the ostiones to read Islam the riot act, more mayhem is all we’ll get.

Allowing a discontented and minuscule portion of one religion to hold the entire world hostage is insane. Until we effectively counterweight this asymmetrical threat with a similar sword of Damocles, more terrorism is all we’ll get.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/11/2004 4:37:06 PM || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:

#1  *sigh* Pinging the Knights of St. John ... (as much as much as I respect the Holy Father)
Posted by: Edward Yee || 04/11/2004 20:13 Comments || Top||

#2  I made a contribution to the Roman Catholic Church this morning, so I think it's fair game for me to say this: I don't see the Church rushing in there to provide the faith, hope, and charity that the Iraqis and others need right now. Talk is cheap.
Posted by: Tom || 04/11/2004 20:56 Comments || Top||

#3  The guy really mumbles. I think he probably said that terrorists were vultures of life and that he'd love to to render them pain and longish deaths.

You just can't trust the news media to report anything accurately anymore.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 21:12 Comments || Top||

#4  B, well, excuse me, since I dropped $20 in the collection plate this AM, but the Pope's hopes are for future developments. I too, resent when the Vatican makes the ill-considered comment on our prosecution of the war on terror, as much as anybody, but when you get down to it, we're all after the same ultimate results, aren't we? Pope John Paul II did his share of work against the Soviets (see: assassination attempts by Bulgarian employees) and gets a pass at this age - STFU about Parkinsons - he'll be replaced (by God and age) soon enuf! May God bless and rest his soul. Those who choose to follow the RCC - i.e.: Chaldeans are welcome additions to the WOT

sorry about the sore point, but this IS Rantburg
Posted by: Frank G || 04/11/2004 21:27 Comments || Top||

#5  oh..lighten up. I'm a true believer in Christian values and oh..all right...I suppose my joke was a tad offensive, but I really didn't mean as much harm as you gave it.

Come on...admit it ...it was kinda funny.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 21:48 Comments || Top||

#6  Yeah, right. Somebody tell john-paul you can achieve more with a "culture of love" and a gun than with a "culture of love" alone.

Especially with radical moslems.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 04/11/2004 22:31 Comments || Top||

#7  Motto of the terrorists: "We love to kill you and it shows".
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/11/2004 23:31 Comments || Top||

#8  (apologies to Delta Airlines)
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/11/2004 23:32 Comments || Top||

#9  I guess my hope that JPII would call another Christian Crusade against the Musselmans is dashed again this year...;-(
Posted by: Jen || 04/12/2004 0:07 Comments || Top||

#10  I don't think he is talking about the Coalition forces. Jesus gave pretty high praise to those like our marines that would give their own life for a stranger. At the heart of terrorism is distilled hate that has corrupted a soul so badly that they would blow up themselves to harm others. I see that as the other side of the coin from a marine.
John Paul's agony must be similar to Jesus' agony in the garden - not for the pain of life and death but for the souls of those who reject love and humanity for hatred.
Once the WOT has been waged and the last splodeydope has splattered his or herself the critical work of breaking down the hate must begin. Fostering prosperity and democracy is a part of that battle, but there will also be a need for someone to reach out a hand to the Arab countries and continue to reach out that same hand even when the hand is bitten, when a finger is cut off and when someone extinguishes a cigarette on the tender palm.
It will take some good souls to accomplish that mission. I know that I have not the patience for that assignment. There may be decades without any appreciable gains. For many cultures enmity can be washed away in two generations. I have know estimate on how many generations it will take Arabs. It is a good sign that Kuwaitis still speak kindly of Americans.
Posted by: Super Hose || 04/12/2004 0:57 Comments || Top||

#11  not for the pain of life and death but for the souls of those who reject love and humanity for hatred.

Wow, SH...after a night of particularly nasty blogging - you certainly set me straight. Well said....all of it. I'll take it to heart, once again.
Posted by: B || 04/12/2004 6:08 Comments || Top||


What the World Needs Now is DDT
Great but long article at the New York Times on the need to bring back DDT to control malaria. Relation to WoT: this would help struggling third-world countries and make them (perhaps) less amenable to harboring terrorist groups like al-Q.
Posted by: Steve White || 04/11/2004 12:49:33 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The NYT? My surprise meter just pegged...
Posted by: PBMcL || 04/11/2004 1:05 Comments || Top||

#2  There's been an undercurrent out there that perhaps bringing DDT back would be a good thing. More and more liberal folks are getting the idea that Rachel Carson did the world a disservice.
Posted by: Steve White || 04/11/2004 1:09 Comments || Top||

#3  I'm with you, PBMcL. Wonder how that article snuck under the NYT's LLL radar.

But it does need to be brought back. It's really the only effective control for mosquitos, and therefore malaria.

Of course, the LLL (who don't live anywhere near malaria-stricken areas) think it's more important to stick to their "principles" than to actually help people - particularly if those people who need the help live on another continent. And aren't white.

I really think those who want to continue a ban on DDT ought to be exposed to the same malaria they want to condemn Africans to - and with the same results and same paucity of treatment. What's sauce for the goose....
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 04/11/2004 2:23 Comments || Top||

#4  I've seen some very convincing articles concerning this. I think overapplication was responsible for the appropriate concerns raised about raptor eggshell thinning. However, more precise application in coutries that desperately need malaria control could save many thousands of lives a year. We just need to exercise better discretion in how we use the stuff.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/11/2004 4:57 Comments || Top||

#5  Im not caring much about malarial but I'd like to kill these damn mosquiters.
Posted by: HalfEmpty || 04/11/2004 8:12 Comments || Top||


Southeast Asia
Malaysia’s opposition warns detractors of divine wrath
Malaysia’s opposition Islamic Party (PAS) has embarked on a road show to protest alleged fraud in last month’s election, and warned detractors of divine wrath for rejecting plans for a theocratic state, a report said Saturday.
"God is really cheesed about this election! All youse guys that didn't vote for us, you're gonna turn into pillars of salt! Repent, ye sinners! Change your vote before it's too late!"
PAS retained control in its northern stronghold of Kelantan state with the slimmest of majorities after a recount, but lost power in neighbouring Terengganu and was thumped in March 21 vote to the federal parliament by Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s National Front. PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang was quoted by the New Straits Times as saying that those voted the National Front back into power in Terengganu were against Islam and blinded by money.
"Dat's right! Liars and thieves, every one of 'em!"
“Those who had voted for the National Front are cheap and blind to the cruelties happening right before their eyes. Those who have rejected the laws of Allah will feel his wrath,” he warned.
"The Finger of God will squish you all! All of you! Like bugs!"
“We stopped many vices in the four years PAS was the government. That was our strength and we proved it but in the election, only a few turned out to vote for PAS and they brought down an Islamic state.”
"It couldn't possibly be that the citizenry was tired of us meddling in their lives. The election musta been fixed!"
Abdul Hadi said PAS would not take to the streets to protest but warned “patience has its limits”. He did not elaborate.
Sounds like they're going to start bumping people off any time now...
The newspaper said the election results would be gazetted on Monday and aggrieved parties have 21 days to file complaints at the high court. PAS and its ally, jailed ex-deputy premier Anwar Ibrahim’s National Justice Party (Keadilan), have charged that electoral fraud and irregularities led to the government’s landslide victory and PAS said it would challenge the results in court. The two parties have launched a nationwide road show on alleged irregularities in the electoral roll that kept thousands of people from voting. The state-backed Human Rights Commission of Malaysia has said such fraud allegations had tarnished the voting process and the country’s image, and required investigation.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:49 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Divine wrath... is that an upgrade to the normal dire revenge that we are usually promised?
Posted by: Scott || 04/11/2004 18:31 Comments || Top||

#2  Divine wrath... is that an upgrade to the normal dire revenge that we are usually promised?

While "Divine Wrath" is widely recognized in the Islamic world as a most calamitous adjunct of Allah's Arsenal,™ the overall spectrum of Jihadist Jibes is as varied and extensive as Kofi Annan's "continuum of steps" that he uses to interdict genocide.

According to the official Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf UN Translator's Guide to Islamic Rhetoric (revisionist edition ©1998) the most common upgrade to "Dire Revenge" is usually a, "Stomach Grilled in Hell." But let us begin at the beginning.

Ancient traditions outlined in the once revered Quip Qu'ran (since declared apostasic) are very specific as to what threat should be leveled when and where against whom. Everyday offenders begin on the bottom rung and merely warrant the redolent label of, "Tartoor." In a similarly dorsal manner, a step up from this brings us to the less feeble, "Backside Kicking." Ascension above these corporeal references begins to give us a brief vision of the fabled hereafter with, "Vanquished." Contrary to the arid circumstances of its origin, the plural context of "Vanquished" assumes a more colorful turn as, "Quagmire of the Dead."

All of these minor epithets eventually begin to coalesce into more vitiolic formulae as we finally approach the dubiously immortal, "Draught of Poison." This toxic brew is deemed less glorious than its violent successor of, "Throats Cut." As the mayhem becomes more formidable we arrive at what Mohammed's Massacre Manual (©1688 Lambskin Press & Co. LLP) suggests should be, "Butchered."

Looking beyond these rather mundane exhortations, Sharia Law finally begins to manifest with, "Beheading." For more complex situations, "Mass Suicide" is recommended, although the "Rain of Bullets" is still held in high regard. Such leaden prose is livened up by a bit of colorful tradition as Islam begins to incorporate some of its own unique and context specific insults. This brings us to the more kinetic, "Hail of Bullets and Shoes."

As always, the Feyadeen Footpath® seeks unimaginably glorious heights, and it is here where the iron grip of fear clasps us to its brass teated bosom. Barely outweighing the "Taste of Definite Death" is a more numerous, "Continuing Slaughter." However, none of these carry the infernal embellishment of, "Thrown into a Crematorium." So it is that we make our entrance into the more well known regions of religious rhetoric much favored by today's clerical firebrands.

The familiar, "Dire Revenge" is unable to hold a candle to "Stomachs Grilled in Hell." Such calamitous cuisine is more easily delivered to the nether world and therefore rates below the extremely labor intensive and nefarious, "Opening the Gates of Hell." Only once we proceed beyond this Mephistophelian portcullis are we finally given a fleeting glimpse of paradise with, "Divine Wrath."

As can be easily seen, it is no simple matter to summon forth such an extensive vocabulary of intimidation. Mastery of such fulsome fulmination requires centuries of fist shaking, ulullations, sneering and general ingratitude. It is only through zealous adherence to a rigorous program of wife beating, female genital mutilation and self-inflicted gaping head wounds that even a flaccid command of these ominous utterances can be obtained.

Provided below is an ordered list of these perilous portents. Read them if you dare!


Divine wrath

Opening the gates of Hell

Stomachs grilled in Hell

Dire revenge

Thrown into a crematorium

Continuing slaughter

The taste of definite death

Hail of bullets and shoes

The rain of bullets

Mass suicide

Beheading

Butchering

Throats cut

Draught of poison

Quagmire of the dead

Vanquished

Backside kicking

Tartoor (full of farts)

Posted by: Zenster || 04/11/2004 22:57 Comments || Top||

#3  "Quip Qu'ran" and "interdict genocide"

LOL! If the former is a ref to Touchstone's 7 degrees of a Lie ("Upon a lie seven times removed..."), you're an Ace! Hysterical! The latter is easier - and also hysterical! Kudos!
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 23:05 Comments || Top||

#4  and it is here where the iron grip of fear clasps us to its brass teated bosom.

God bless the Internet.
Posted by: B || 04/11/2004 23:12 Comments || Top||


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Kurd Parties Accuse Syria of Mass Arrests
Syrian Kurds accused authorities yesterday of arbitrarily arresting hundreds from their community and torturing some of them to death since a bout of unrest died down last month. “The campaign of arrests and raids is continuing in all the Kurdish areas as well as in Aleppo and Damascus,” Syrian Kurdish parties said in a joint statement. “This campaign has in the past two days resulted in the arrest of hundreds of Kurdish citizens, including women and schoolchildren no more than 15 years old, all of whom were and remain subjected to savage torture.” Syrian officials were not immediately available for comment. About 30 people were killed in unprecedented clashes between Syrian Kurds and police in March after a soccer match brawl in the northern town of Kameshli escalated.

Kurdish activists said on March 19 that authorities had freed 500 to 600 Kurds detained in the wave of unrest, but said there could be up to 2,000 more still in detention. The state, which has accused unspecified foreigners of stirring violence to shake Syria’s security, has not released its own figures. The Syrian Kurdish parties said two Kurdish men, identified as Hussein Naaso and Ferhad Ali, had died this week as a result of torture in detention, while another man was in a coma. “We condemn this racist policy against our people and urge authorities to cease the campaign of arbitrary arrests and free all of the detainees,” the statement said. Rights group Amnesty International this week wrung its hands urged Syria to make known the whereabouts of Kurds detained in the clashes.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:34 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Whoa! Fred laying down heavy Easter Eggs.
Singh Ho! The Way of The Ham is Weird.
Off to be slicing.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 13:23 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine
Palestinians rebuff US West Bank 'deal'
Funny. I can't recall us having offered them a West Bank "deal." Musta slipped my mind...
Palestinian authorities have said that any US assurance to Israel that it will not have to quit all of the West Bank in a future peace deal, will fly in the face of the roadkill "road map" and result in even more instability in the region.
Hard to imagine how there could be more...
Spokespersons for the Palestinian Authority and Hamas were squealing like piggies reacting to a report in an Israeli newspaper on Sunday that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon will receive, in exchange for a planned Gaza pullout, a written US assurance Israel will not have to quit all of the West Bank in any future peace deal. The paper said the pledge would be contained in a letter that US President George Bush will hand Sharon at their White House meeting on Wednesday. "Palestinians will not accept that, especially those working on the peace process", said Hamas representative in Lebanon, Osama Hamdan, "as they guaranteed for their people that they will have the Gaza Strip and West Bank".
If you're not playing by the rules, don't bitch when the other guys start another game. (I don't think they've caught on yet that it's a new game. They're pretty slow on the uptake. It's all that time they spend bumping their foreheads on the ground.)
Should there be "no complete withdrawal to pre-1967 borders, it will destroy the entire peace process", said Hamdan, speaking to Aljazeera.net.
The peace processor's unplugged at the moment...
"It would mean an end to their (the negotiators') political careers", he added. The Palestinians want all of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, captured by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war, for the state they hope to establish under a US-backed peace "road map".
Actually, they want all of Israel. But we've been over that before.
"This is our aim", said PA Foreign Affairs spokesperson Muhammad al-Wahbidi. "We accepted the road map because we want to see an independent Palestinian state."
"Then we crapped on it, because there ain't nobody tells us what to do!"
"There is no need to renegotiate", he added.
Nobody's negotiating with you. Tough, ain't it?
Al-Wahbidi said the PA had not yet officially been informed the US was to give Israel those assurances, but added that "we will listen to the Americans and they will listen to us and in the end, we will know the guarantees and assurances".
Or not. If Powell calls me for my opinion tonight, I'll suggest he let it be a surprise. Kinda like a birthday party, only different.
PA Chief negotiator, Nabil Shaath is also to meet with US Secretary of State, Colin Powell in the US later this month.
Talk about baseball instead, Colin.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:51 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "Palestinian authorities have said that any US assurance to Israel that it will not have to quit all of the West Bank in a future peace deal, will fly in the face of the "road map" and result in even more instability in the region."

Pathetic losers don't realize the train is leaving the station as they posture and seethe and threaten - This would be the same Road Map™ you've pissed on since the day is was implemented (by one side)? The only thing they'll end up with is a wall to spray graffiti on and dirt sandwiches. Bon Apetit!
Posted by: Frank G || 04/11/2004 17:55 Comments || Top||

#2 
Palestinians rebuff US West Bank 'deal'
So what else is new? Again, they're missing a opportunity. In a way, ya' gotta admire a perfect record like theirs.

Sure, they're losers, but at least they're perfect losers.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 04/11/2004 18:21 Comments || Top||

#3  Sure, they're losers, but at least they're perfect losers

so they got that going for them...which is nice
Posted by: Frank G || 04/11/2004 18:49 Comments || Top||

#4  Is there any other group in history with a record like this?
Posted by: The Doctor || 04/11/2004 22:54 Comments || Top||

#5  You know? It's really sort of sad the way that this whole roadmap and peace process blew up in Yassin's face.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/12/2004 0:33 Comments || Top||


Afghanistan/South Asia
Nepal king gives police sweeping powers as protests rise
King Gyanendra of Nepal on Saturday gave security forces sweeping powers of arrest, as riot police rounded up hundreds more pro-democracy protesters outside his palace. State radio said the king renewed an ordinance that gives police and troops the right to detain people and search homes on suspicion of “terrorist” activities.
With, in this case, a fairly wide definition of "terrorism."
The ordinance had just expired after being imposed by parliament for two years in April 2002. King Gyanendra, who dismissed the elected government six months later, extended it in the absence of a parliament. The measure was designed to help troops battle Maoist rebels, who have been fighting since 1996 to overthrow the monarchy.
But now it's being used against the guys who'd like to see the parliament back...
But its renewal comes after a week of massive demonstrations in Kathmandu demanding the restoration of democracy. The protests are sponsored by the main parties in the dissolved parliament, which are not linked to the Maoists. Several hundred protesters gathered Saturday in a park outside the palace but were promptly rounded up by police enforcing a two-day-old ban on public gatherings in the capital, witnesses said. Tens of thousands had rallied Friday outside the palace but their threats to cross the barbed-wire barricades and storm the sprawling palace compound were thwarted when police detained them en masse. “Most of the protesters have been released soon after Friday’s events but nearly 1,600 of them remain in custody,” a police officer said on condition of anonymity. Opposition parties charged that the government did not supply food, water or beds for the detained protesters who spent the night crammed in three public buildings.
Methinks ye Kinge is toast. And probably good riddance.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:50 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


NGO demands end to bonded labour
The government should take drastic steps to eradicate the bonded labour system, which has been abolished but still exist in most parts of the country.
I think we abolished indentured servitude sometime before the Delcaration of Independence...
The bonded labour system is prohibited under Article 11 Clause 2 of the Constitution.
Guess that's the diffo between theory and practice, huh?
The majority of the bonded labour system’s victims live in poverty and are forced to accept whatever work they can get. Advocate Ajmal Khan Khattak, chairman of the Legal Aid and Human Rights Society, said that more than 600 families, the majority of whom are Afghans, work in bonded labour conditions in the 230 brick kilns in the twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad. At a news conference on Saturday, he said it is deplorable that the bonded labour system has been formally abolished, but the system’s practices of confining labourers and bringing labourers on peshgi or advance payments exists in many places in the country while responsible authorities turn a blind eye.
That's why we have baksheesh, right?
He said people are forced to live under miserable conditions and the employers, specifically the owners of the brick kilns, allegedly ignore their fundamental rights. Mr Khattak said labourers at different brick kilns get a meagre Rs 135 per 1000 bricks whereas the rate specified in 1995 was Rs 190 per 1000 bricks. He said female workers are often molested at the kilns and few have the courage to lodge reports in police stations against the owners of the brick kilns.
... since they're then liable to stoning.
He said there have been a number of applications to district administrations in the twin cities to conduct raids at various brick kilns and release the labourers, but there has been little action by authorities.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:45 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Indentured servitude = bonded labour?

But of course I'm being simplime and unsophisticated. Surely, there is no corruption in this Islamic Paradise.
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 16:49 Comments || Top||


Mobs set fire to network cables
Cable network operators have protested against the tearing down and the burning of two network cables on Friday by mobs of ignoranti accusing operators of releasing obscene movies.
"Titties! They got titties on them cables! Tear 'em down, boys!"
People in Peeri Bagh and Mehbooba Dheri gathered after the Friday prayers, tore up cables of the OK Cables and Geo Cables networks and then set them on fire.
Just after prayers, was it? Ain't that a coincidence! Surely it didn't have anything to do with the sermon?
The people accused the two networks of releasing obscene movies being banned by the Pakistan Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA). However, network owners denied the allegation. Cable Operators Association President Mujahid Salim told Daily Times that this was a third attempt by the local groups against the cable networks in the city, but the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) government and PEMRA had failed to provide them protection.
MMA's in control, and you expect to watch something you want to see on the teevee? Right. That's gonna happen.
“The allegation is unfounded and baseless and if some people have watched the banned channels they should file complaints with PEMRA instead of attacking the networks. Everyone has his own definition of obscenity and vulgarity, but PEMRA is the body that can declare the channels prohibited or otherwise,” Mr Salim said.
Some people's definition of vulgarity and obscenity is pretty wide...
He said that despite their repeated complaints, neither the government nor PEMRA had taken any steps for their security. “If the government cannot provide us security they should ask us to close down our businesses, and we will do it,” he warned.
Ummm... I think that's the basic idea.
He said last time cable networks in the city were attacked, PEMRA had assured the operators of protection and action against the attackers, but nothing had been done. “We have asked the administration for security and protection and action against the attackers, but we are sure they will not investigate into the case as before,” he complained. He said his association would fully support the government in implementing the PEMRA rules and regulations and would not support those airing banned and obscene channels.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:44 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1 
"The people accused the two networks of releasing obscene movies being banned by the Pakistan Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA)."
No MTV for you! Get back to your Quran studies!
"'If the government cannot provide us security they should ask us to close down our businesses...'"
Anybody in the mob named Al-Ashcroft?
Posted by: Old Grouch || 04/11/2004 15:22 Comments || Top||


Islam the solution to mental illness?
Mental health in Pakistan is an important issue and needs to be attended to with help from civil society, Punjab Special Education Minister Qudsia Lodhi told a conference on ‘Islam and Mental Health’ organised by the International Conference of Pakistan Association of Clinical Psychologists (PACP) in Lahore on Saturday. “Solution to our problems lies in the teachings of Islam. We can achieve success and peace by following universal principles of our religion,” Ms Lodhi said.
Likewise, if you accidentally drive a nail through your forehead, the solution is to drive more nails into your forehead, and maybe a few into your temples as well...
The minister said Islamic laws stressed human relationships and urged Muslims to treat parents with kindness and love. Parents, she added, had similar responsibilities towards their children. “Rights of the relatives, orphans and neighbours are defined clearly in Islam. There is guidance also on how to treat your teachers, strangers or travellers. In fact, it all adds up to a charter of human rights. Even animal rights have been spelled,” she said.
"And if you get tired of being nice to people and to animals, there's always jihad."
Ms Lodhi said that since the parameters were already drawn, it made the job of a clinical psychologist relatively easier. She said the conference should focus on Islamic teachings and take public mental health as a serious problem at the grassroots level in Pakistan. She said globalisation resulted in people around the world being flooded with new information as well as rapid social changes. “Contemporary realities can threaten cherished traditions and values and pose serious challenges to personal adjustment.”
"One has to be careful not to allow this external reality to intrude on our Islamic world. I have set djinns to guard us, but the efrits are very powerful! There are dark conspiracies™ trying to promote the illusion of paranoia..."
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:42 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  This was said in English, right? Wonder what he said in Arabic.
Posted by: Raj || 04/11/2004 14:40 Comments || Top||

#2 
There is guidance also on how to treat your teachers, strangers or travellers.

Blow up schools. Ban books. Blow up airplanes. Blow up trains. Blow up busses. Blow up hotels. Steal passports. Steal credit cards. Kidnap and murder tourists and aid workers.
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 04/11/2004 16:12 Comments || Top||

#3  Islam? Mental Illness? Solution? This is a joke, right?
Heh Ha. Hahahaha! HAHAHA!
HAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHAHAH!
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 16:22 Comments || Top||

#4  Bin seeing this s*it before. Usually around the holiday season.
Posted by: Nuss Ratchett || 04/11/2004 17:13 Comments || Top||

#5  Headline was wrongly quote - correction follows:

Islam the Solution to Source of Mental Illness
Posted by: OldSpook || 04/11/2004 19:12 Comments || Top||

#6  "Islam and Mental Health - can they coexist?"
Posted by: Frank G || 04/11/2004 19:23 Comments || Top||

#7  Frank G: No.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 04/11/2004 22:33 Comments || Top||

#8  Frank: the presence of one implies a lack of the other.
Posted by: The Doctor || 04/11/2004 22:51 Comments || Top||

#9  Islam the solution to mental illness?

If ever there was proof that the cure can be worse than the disease ...
Posted by: Zenster || 04/11/2004 23:57 Comments || Top||

#10  Comment by a muslim girl:
Hi everyone (:
This is my first time on this web site, and I believe you guys have a lot of facts wrong!
Sorry! I know no one like being told that, but aren't you playing into the hands of politicians?
How many of you has really stopped and got a book on Islam and read it?
Do you know that muslims believe that:
What Osama Bin Laden did, if it was him, is wrong?
We are not people who like violance, we only fight in self defence.
What is wrong with you people?
Do you just swollow up everything forced into your mouths?
Think, for God's sake, THINK!
Islam is against exremists, did you know that?
Islam is even against killing a bird for sport!
It is a religion of mercy, NOT what you imagine it to be.
I wish I knew how to SHOW you what Islam is like. I wish I could.
P.S. Please answer my comment, it came from the depths of my heart.
P.P.S. Please. DON'T leat you hatred blind you.

Thanks for the time
Posted by: Gentle || 04/18/2004 8:48 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine
Likud Sets Date for Gaza Referendum
Israel's ruling Likud party will vote April 29 on Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's hotly debated plan to pull out of the Gaza Strip and four West Bank settlements, a party spokesman said Sunday. Seeking the vote is an enormous gamble for Sharon because his hard-line party is divided over the plan and approval is far from assured. Sharon has pledged to honor the outcome and could come under growing pressure to resign if he loses. Likud spokesman Shmuel Dahan said the date was chosen at a meeting of the party's Central Election Committee. If he wins approval from Likud's 200,000 members, Sharon reportedly will seek Cabinet and parliamentary approval within days.
Hope they go for it. It's solid good sense. You can tell, because the Paleos hate it.
The decision on the date came a day before Sharon was to leave for Washington, where he will seek President Bush's endorsement of the plan in a meeting Wednesday. A vote of confidence from Bush would give Sharon an important boost. Several senior Cabinet ministers have said they will not support Sharon without American backing. Media reports said the Cabinet might vote May 2, to be followed a day later by the rest of parliament. The extent of U.S. support for the plan remained unclear. Sharon sent several senior aides to Washington over the weekend to work out final details on the agenda of the meeting. The United States has said it supports the idea of a Gaza pullout, but only as part of the internationally backed "road map" peace plan.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 12:10 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:


Iraq-Jordan
In the Marshes Islamists lose elections, commies win some
EFL - a week ago in the Guardian
Herded into lines by inexperienced police officers, hundreds of would-be Iraqi voters ...Deep in the marshlands of the Euphrates, the town of 15,000 people was the first to rise against Saddam Hussein in the abortive intifada of 1991. Now it was holding the first genuine election in its history.... the results have been surprising. Seventeen towns have voted, and in almost every case secular independents and representatives of non-religious parties did better than the Islamists.... In Shatra, a town of 250,000, the Communist party
[probably they somewhat resemble the EU socialist type parties]
won four seats and independents seven... The Islamists had a majority in the former council which was appointed last summer. After the election they were cut back to four seats out of 15. "It was not a surprise," said Jalil Abed Jafar, a doctor, in the Communist party’s upstairs offices along the waterfront...
Posted by: mhw || 04/11/2004 11:15:08 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Jeez, you know it's bad when you're relieved the Commies did well.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 11:27 Comments || Top||

#2  What's really distinctive about Communists in Moslem societies is that Communists are openly athiest. I think that the voters are not voting so much for Communist economics as they are voting for Communist athiesm.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 04/11/2004 11:40 Comments || Top||

#3  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: mhw TROLL || 04/11/2004 11:42 Comments || Top||

#4  Really interesting!
Posted by: Phil B || 04/11/2004 11:46 Comments || Top||

#5  You know, this puts the last two weeks' events in Iraq in a whole new light. The people we appointed for the council all lost; we may have grossly erred in thinking that the Iraqis wanted to choose between Sistani and Sadr as who wanted to run the country.
Posted by: Phil Fraering || 04/11/2004 13:16 Comments || Top||

#6  If my memory doesn't fail me Iraq's communist party supported (although in a grudging way) operation Iraqui Freedom. Anyone has fainted?
Posted by: JFM || 04/11/2004 13:32 Comments || Top||

#7  Mike,
good point; also a vote for the Communists may also be a vote against tribal chiefs
Posted by: mhw || 04/11/2004 11:42 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Culture Wars
Now Selling Special Burgers...
I got this link from over at LGF A little menu item to help settle the stomach. Enjoy.
Posted by: badanov || 04/11/2004 5:30:24 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Islam in need of a Reformation (Think Protestantism)
EFL - read the whole thing
By Ibrahim Kazerooni
Most are unaware, but there was a time when Europe looked to Islam and the Muslim world as a highly advanced and progressive force. While Europe languished in its medieval period, the Muslim world made huge strides advancing human knowledge in the areas of science, mathematics, astronomy, medicine, philosophy and more... Not unlike Europe's dark ages, many parts of the Muslim world today have slipped into a medieval-like period characterized by regressive tendencies, many of which are completely inconsistent with and foreign to the teachings of Islam... Unfortunately, regressive elements in the Muslim world - such as Wahhabism - have capitalized on Muslims' anger over their failed governments, colonialism and foreign interference in the internal affairs of their countries, to gradually win over more and more adherents... far too many Muslims have lost touch with the progressive nature of their religion and have chosen to focus on dogma, which can only breed intolerance. ... Sadly, this causes the religion - a living belief system - to become stagnant. Muslims could use a St. Thomas Aquinas of their own right about now.

The central pillar of Islam is the belief in the one, almighty God, the source of all things. Islam stresses the need for tolerance and cooperation, since God is the source of the diversity and differences among us. Islam also teaches ethical norms such as the sanctity of life; equality of all human beings regardless of race, language and economic status; honoring our parents; reverence for the law of God; humane treatment of people and animals; justice and aid for the poor and oppressed; kindness and generosity towards neighbors; equal justice before the law; respect for women; one's obligation to actively pursue knowledge; and many others.
He's discussing what he thinks things should be, rather than what actually is, theory rather than practice.
Over the years, some Muslims have forgotten many aspects of their own religious teachings and, as a result, have lost sight of genuinely Islamic solutions to the present-day issues and challenges facing them. Today, lack of tolerance and respect for others (especially those who disagree with our points of view), arrogance, oppression, disrespect for human life, and ignorance are among the prevailing characteristics in too many Muslim societies.
Now he's discussing actual practice...
If Muslims are to remedy the tragic situation many find themselves in now, we must rediscover the original Islamic ideas that will reintroduce innovation and creativity into our struggling societies.
FYI, this Imam also has an editorial entitled: Wahhabism a threat to world peace (linked to on that page)
Posted by: OldSpook || 04/11/2004 3:28:21 AM || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Funny what you run into when you are looking for a local news paper report about the NCAA hockey championship.

If there were more Imams like this fellow, there'd be a lot less dead people in the middle east. Sad thing is that Sadr and his ilk would try to kill off this Imam were he over there. True reform is a huge threat to the power base the Shia fundamentalist theocratic scam system is built upon.

(FYI - Denver University won the NCAA Hockey Championship! Maybe its the Avalanche's year too?).
Posted by: OldSpook || 04/11/2004 3:33 Comments || Top||

#2  Muslim world made huge strides advancing human knowledge in the areas of science, mathematics, astronomy, medicine, philosophy and more.

Debateable! Mostly they preserved Greek knowledge and to an extent transmitted Indian Knowledge to Europe. Also many of the Islamic scholars were in fact Jews or Christians. Find me an Imam who admits that and I will take notice of what they have to say.
Posted by: Phil B || 04/11/2004 3:35 Comments || Top||

#3  I suppose that a religion invented by a lying, mass-murdering, Jew-hating, illiterate pedophile could be "reformed", but I doubt it.
Posted by: Kirk || 04/11/2004 3:42 Comments || Top||

#4  You might be surprised, Phil B. Muslims were among the earliest to utilze windpower, hydro-power and specialized control engineering. Much of modern European cooking owes a great debt to Moslem cuisine as well.

I will certainly agree that the modern Muslim faith must face a complete and total reformation of their jihadist mentality. I'm still waiting to see moderate Imams martyr themselves by going into extremist regions and preaching the wrongness of violent jihad.

Once there is an overall rejection of terrorism and violence against innocent civilians, I will not feel quite so compelled to urge that we hold all major Moslem shrines hostage against further large-scale terrorist attacks.

Until then, a chemical or biological attack on any Israeli or Western city should result in the similar contamination of Medina. A dirty bomb explosion means we dust Medina with powdered isotopes of the same elements used in the attack. Evacuation notices depend upon whether we get any.

A nuclear terrorist attack means that we glass over and Windex Medina. A second one and Mecca is fused silica. I think that if Islam was confronted with the permanent crippling or loss of their most sacred shrines they might just STFU and quit all this jihadist nonsense.

We need to start in the triangle with lesser mosques and work our way up to Karbala's Tomb of El-Hussein. If the Shiites do not stop their attacks and interference with Iraqi democracy, we just start razing their most sacred holy sites.

If they keep it up long enough, they will merely cause the obliteration of all of their most treasured places of worship. This would send a perfect shot across the Islamist's bow concerning the major Saudi shrines as well. I'm sick of Islamists holding the world hostage with terror. If they know that any further major attacks would rain destruction on their most precious religious sites, they might calm down a bit.

Bouncing the Shiite rubble a few times might get their synapses firing for the first time in ages. Sure they might get real pissed off, but that's a chance I'm willing to take. Especially if they can't bring themselves to begin reforming their twisted religion. Until then, we maintain a credible deterrent by threatening the only thing they hold dear. If Islamist terrorism doesn't end, their effing pilgrimages will.

Just a little idea of mine.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/11/2004 4:41 Comments || Top||

#5  Muslims were among the earliest to utilze windpower

Hero of Alexandria (a Greek) described a wind powered device in the first century AD.

And your comment on Muslim cuisine baffled me.
Posted by: Phil B || 04/11/2004 5:14 Comments || Top||

#6  Phil, His name was Heron, and he also described a steam-powered engine. (The reason that these inventions were not realized in the ancient Greece and territoriries -- there was a sufficient and replenishable supply of human power --slaves-- that these inventions were not economical.

As for 'muslim cuisine', puzzled too. There is no such a thing. Neither there is 'christian cuisine'. Arab cuisine, Moorish cuisine, Turkish Cuisine, Malaysian cuisine..., etc., sure.
Posted by: rsd || 04/11/2004 5:34 Comments || Top||

#7  >'christian cuisine'?

Easter eggs, of course. And chocolate bunnies.
Posted by: RussSchultz || 04/11/2004 9:26 Comments || Top||

#8  The Arabs in Baghdad had a very advanced Astronomical observatory. They studdied the constellations and the movement of the planets and had a fairley advanced solar calendar .
Posted by: Deacon Blues || 04/11/2004 10:21 Comments || Top||

#9  The non-Arabs in Babylon had about 3000 years of practice at astronomy (for astrological purposes) before Moh was a gleam in his daddy's eye.
Posted by: Fred || 04/11/2004 10:35 Comments || Top||

#10  But didn't a catholic invent the reflecting telescope?
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 10:44 Comments || Top||

#11  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: mhw TROLL || 04/11/2004 10:54 Comments || Top||

#12  If'in we could lay a 30 years war on these slow boys it might be a good thing.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 13:09 Comments || Top||

#13  And your comment on Muslim cuisine baffled me.

Phil B, please peruse the The Cambridge World History of Food sometime. Mesopotamia had one of the most advanced food cultures in ancient history. Their use of highly varied and contrasting ingredients (sweet & salty) laid the foundations for most Mediterranean cuisines, including the Romans'. Italian cooking was one of the most significant influences upon French haute cuisine.

"The land between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, today part of Iraq, was apparently the birthplace of haute cuisine as well as a cradle of civilization.

One text that has come down to us is a Sumerian-Akkadian bilingual dictionary, recorded in cuneiform script on 24 stone tablets about 1900 BC. It lists terms in the two ancient Mesopotamian languages for over 800 different items of food and drink. Included are 20 different kinds of cheese, over 100 varieties of soup and 300 types of bread - each with different ingredients, filling, shape or size."
Posted by: Zenster || 04/11/2004 15:57 Comments || Top||

#14  Ship - Here ya go, bro... :-)

Dumbass feel-good BS such as Morgan Freeman's moor character boggling Kevin Costner's poor unsophisticated Robin Hood character with a crude refracting telescope is just typical PC idiocy from Hollyweird. They wouldn't know fact from fiction if their lives depended upon it - unless it was in the form of a paycheck, methinks.

Regards Arab cuisine - it sucks like an F5. They turn everything into mush for scooping up with Indian panbread. I astounded a headwaiter in Al Dammam once by ordering fried eggplant with onions and garlic in olive oil - UN-pureed. On my first visit - they turned this great Mediterranean dish into baby shit in a bowl - as they do with almost everything except rice and meat. So-called Arabic food restaurants elsewhere have caught on: we don't like baby food after we grow up - so many I've visited serve veggie dishes Mediterranean-style, not Arab style. Check it out at an Arabic food outlet if inclined - but ask how they prep various dishes - many are an unappetizing surprise. BTW, the eggplant dish rocked in its original Mediterranean form, unlike the Arabic mush form.
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 16:18 Comments || Top||

#15  Dang! Perhaps it was a Catholic after all. I was always led to believe it was Newton. who knows. The arabs invented the caluclus tho right?
Posted by: Shipman || 04/11/2004 17:34 Comments || Top||

#16  Ship - LOL! Of course not - you're just funnin' me, right?!??! Here's an authoritative bit on the topic - but there are hundred such articles... the reason I present you with this one is the page title - check it out! Lol!
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 17:57 Comments || Top||

#17  Now this page is the point where some Arabian innovation is creditable. Note, however, that even Arabic Numerals are Indian, and that the concept and working systems from other sources predate the achievement. Refinement and formalization of the process is the actual achievement - and it is definitely worthy of note and our admiration!

Credit where due - always. Screw revisionism!
Posted by: .com || 04/11/2004 18:06 Comments || Top||

#18  From .com's link

Al- Khawarizmi was born in an area called Khwarism in the year 780, east of the Caspian Sea. In Baghdad, an important center of Islamic learning, Al-Kharizmi (whose Latin name is Algorithmi) wrote accounts numbers in decimal units introduced from India and encouraged their use in all calculations. His books include one titled "Al-Khwarizmi on the Numerals of the Indians" that did much to extend the use of these symbol throughout the Western world.

I have seen Arabs credited with invention of both Algebra and the concept of zero. The above makes it clear that they didn't invent the first and the concept of zero as we understand it today was discovered in India.

I did a couple of history of science courses in university and its interesting that the stuff I was taught about the Arabs inventing this and that, I have subsequently discovered to be almost all false.
Posted by: Phil B || 04/11/2004 20:05 Comments || Top||

#19  Lies! Lies! All Infidel Lies!

(BTW, where's Mucky today, Ship? Heh...)
Posted by: Islamic Scholar (Abu .Blashphemer) || 04/11/2004 20:12 Comments || Top||

#20  Regards Arab cuisine - it sucks like an F5. They turn everything into mush for scooping up with Indian panbread. I astounded a headwaiter in Al Dammam once by ordering fried eggplant with onions and garlic in olive oil - UN-pureed. On my first visit - they turned this great Mediterranean dish into baby shit in a bowl - as they do with almost everything except rice and meat. So-called Arabic food restaurants elsewhere have caught on: we don't like baby food after we grow up - so many I've visited serve veggie dishes Mediterranean-style, not Arab style. Check it out at an Arabic food outlet if inclined - but ask how they prep various dishes - many are an unappetizing surprise. BTW, the eggplant dish rocked in its original Mediterranean form, unlike the Arabic mush form.

.com, it's pretty obvious you have yet to sample even a fraction of Arabic food. It is among one of the world's finest cusines. I rate almost like Mexican, which is one of my favorites.

If you've never had slivers of vertically roasted gyros stuffed into a souvlaki style sandwich drenched with tzatziki sour cream & yogurt garlic sauce, you haven't lived. Likewise with piping hot falafels, tahini sauce and fresh vegetables folded into warm pita. This is some of the most healthy food on earth.

Lamb shish kebab over basmati rice with a side of hummus and roasted tomato. Superbly mild kibbe, sirloin beef tartare minced with bulgur wheat. The incomparable chello, a flatiron pan of perfectly brown-crusted cooked long grain rice.

You do not know what you're missing.

HINT: I prepare food from every continent on earth.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/12/2004 6:23 Comments || Top||

#21  I prepare food from every continent on earth.

Barbecued penguin, yummy! Now you are talking (through your ass).
Posted by: Phil B || 04/12/2004 6:45 Comments || Top||

#22  It is important to remember that virtually all the science in the Islamic empire was the work of apostates.

It is also important to realize that there already is a kind of reformed Islam, namely the Admadiyya movement. They are genuinely non violent and are hated by other moslems. An example of a moslem horrified by the Admadiyya movement is at: http://alhafeez.org/rashid/escape.htm
http://alhafeez.org/rashid/escape.htm
Posted by: mhw || 04/11/2004 10:54 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine
Sharon to Get U.S. Nod to Keep W.Bank Land -Report
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon will receive, in exchange for a planned Gaza pullout, a written U.S. assurance Israel will not have to quit all of the West Bank in any future peace deal, an Israeli newspaper said on Sunday. The Haaretz daily said the pledge would be contained in a letter that President Bush will hand Sharon at their White House meeting on Wednesday. Political analysts say the more benefits the United States offers Sharon in the meetings in Washington, the easier it will be for him to obtain backing at home for his declared plan to withdraw from Gaza and four of some 120 West Bank settlements.
Let's not give away the store here; the Gaza withdrawal is a no-brainer good idea even if we don't hand out candy to the Israelis.
The newspaper said Bush's letter will declare that Israel will not be asked in the future to withdraw to the pre-1967 boundary known as the "green line." Determination of borders in any final-status accord with the Palestinians will take into consideration "demographic realities" on the ground, Haaretz quoted from the letter in an indirect reference to Jewish settlements on occupied land.
That's going to upset some Paleos!
On the other hand, there's not much that doesn't upset them, is there? They're a sensitive lot...
There was no immediate official Israeli comment on the report, which was carried by the newspaper's Web Site before the morning newspaper hit the stands. The report was likely to stoke Palestinian fears the Gaza pullout plan is an Israeli ruse to annex West Bank settlement blocs. Haaretz said Israeli officials believe the letter constituted U.S. acquiescence to such a future move. Bush's letter will effectively challenge any right of return by Palestinian refugees to what is now Israel, saying they can be absorbed in a future Palestinian state.
However small it ends up being.
In his own letter to Bush, Sharon will reiterate Israel's commitment to the roadkill road map peace plan and the president's vision of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Palestinians have said Sharon's unilateral steps contradict the road map's vision of mutual moves toward peace and a negotiated settlement leading to the creation of a Palestinian state by 2005. Sharon has said that more than three years of violence has shown that Israel has no real Palestinian peace partner.
And won't anytime soon.
Posted by: Steve White || 04/11/2004 12:31:12 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  seething starting in 3....2.....1....

Actually this is excellent payback for killing those 3 Americans in Gaza and doing squat to pony up the real killers. Lesson in Cause=>Effect, #3853
Posted by: Frank G || 04/11/2004 10:49 Comments || Top||

#2  Frank G: I think your cause-effect lesson number is off by at least a factor of 10. ;-p

Not that it matters with the Pals. After all, they "never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." And they've still got a perfect record. (Guess everyone has to be good at something).
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 04/11/2004 11:04 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
76[untagged]

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Sun 2004-04-11
  Khatami backs off from Sadr
Sat 2004-04-10
  IGC calls for immediate ceasefire
Fri 2004-04-09
  Rafsanjani Butts In
Thu 2004-04-08
  8 Koreans, 3 Japanese Kidnapped in Iraq
Wed 2004-04-07
  House to house, roof to roof
Tue 2004-04-06
  Al-Sadr threat comes to a head; Marines in Fallujah
Mon 2004-04-05
  Fallujah surrounded; Sadr "outlaw", Mahdi army thumped
Sun 2004-04-04
  4 Salvadoran, 14 thugs dead in Sadr festivities
Sat 2004-04-03
  Sharon Says Israel Will Leave Gaza Strip
Fri 2004-04-02
  The trains in Spain are mined with bombs again
Thu 2004-04-01
  Hit on Jamali thwarted?
Wed 2004-03-31
  Savagery in Fallujah
Tue 2004-03-30
  Major al-Qaeda bombing foiled in the UK
Mon 2004-03-29
  Mullah Omar wounded in airstrike?
Sun 2004-03-28
  Rantissi: Bush Is 'Enemy of God'
Sat 2004-03-27
  Perv vows to eliminate al-Qaeda


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
18.217.8.82
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (46)    Non-WoT (1)    (0)    (0)    (0)