1 |
Aris Katsaris |
"So just why the hell can't Howard make remarks about the candidates in our elections?"
Because Republicans were throwing a hissy fit with pretensions of national pride, each and every time a European leader said anything against Bush? Hipocricy alert?
Can you imagine your reactions if an Australian (or European) PM had directed such comments *against* Bush?
Actually we don't need to imagine them, we just need to remember them. Weren't Rantburgers threatening to nuke every nation whose leaders tried to interfere or comment on your elections, I think?
The doublethink inherent would be so amusing if it weren't so sad.
And as for the core of Howard's comments, everyone knows what a great boost the invasion of Iraq was to Al Qaeda and to Tehran both -- both Sunni and Shiite islamofascisms greatly strengthened. This is just a plain fact anymore, not a matter of debate.
Affirmative action can get you a Harvard degree, but it can't get you elected president
Ooh, and you *almost* had me convinced that Obama's race had nothing to do with it. |
2007-02-12 09:36 |
62.38.195.83 |