Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 02/07/2006 View Mon 02/06/2006 View Sun 02/05/2006 View Sat 02/04/2006 View Fri 02/03/2006 View Thu 02/02/2006 View Wed 02/01/2006
1
2006-02-07 Science & Technology
Bush Silent On BMD Success
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by ed 2006-02-07 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 So?
Posted by RWV 2006-02-07 02:58||   2006-02-07 02:58|| Front Page Top

#2 i find spacewar is normally very anti Bush and take with salt
Posted by ShepUK 2006-02-07 06:53||   2006-02-07 06:53|| Front Page Top

#3 Actually the article isn't by spacewar. Its a UPI article
Posted by Valentine 2006-02-07 06:59||   2006-02-07 06:59|| Front Page Top

#4 He's to busy attending a funeral in Atlanta today where people absolutely dispise him. Wake up Mr. President. They'll have forgotten about your gesture of friendship before your plane leaves Dobbins AFB.
Posted by Besoeker 2006-02-07 07:46||   2006-02-07 07:46|| Front Page Top

#5 The billions lavished on missile defense could be much better spent on protecting U.S. ports and chemical plants, or on increased investments in locking down loose nuclear weapons and nuclear bomb-making materials in Russia and beyond."

Are they going to run with this? I'm really beginning to believe that Karl Rove is writing the Democratic party's platform.
Posted by 2b 2006-02-07 10:55||   2006-02-07 10:55|| Front Page Top

#6 One can only hope, 2b, one can only hope!
Posted by Karl Rove, evil genius 2006-02-07 11:04||   2006-02-07 11:04|| Front Page Top

#7 Yet after a breakthrough year of successful tests, increased weapons and radar deployments with more major nations than ever around the world committing billions of dollars to buy U.S. systems and develop complementary defense systems on BMD, President George W. Bush did not say a word about any of it in his State of the Union address Tuesday night. Why not?

Why should he?
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2006-02-07 15:10||   2006-02-07 15:10|| Front Page Top

#8 I see it as an indicator that the system is mostly built, yet not entirely finished. And yet, when finished, it won't be talked about, either.

Right now, the US faces at least two tangible ballistic missile threats. Imagine the shock and surprise if one of our enemies shoots one at us, and it just goes *poof*, disappears. And then the US does *nothing*. Says nothing, does nothing.

At that point, suddenly that enemy experiences all sorts of grave self-doubts. Call it "shitting themselves", if you like. We own them.

Do they button up against nuclear counterattack for a week? A month? Do they continue with their attack plan somewhere else? They can literally be paralyzed with fear.
Posted by Anonymoose 2006-02-07 20:56||   2006-02-07 20:56|| Front Page Top

10:00 The Angry Fliegerabwehrkanonen
07:59 Besoeker
10:53 Hyper
23:49 Craper Glerenter1108
23:47 mmurray821
23:44 gromgoru
23:35 phil_b
23:27 Scott R
23:09 Sock Puppet O´ Doom
23:00 Sock Puppet O´ Doom
22:50 Mike
22:44 Frank G
22:43 Frank G
22:33 Pappy
22:27 Fordesque
22:18 whitecollar redneck
22:16 Bomb-a-rama
22:14 Matt
22:10 steve
22:10 JosephMendiola
22:06 2b
22:03 .com
22:01 2b
22:00 DMFD









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com