Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 02/19/2007 View Sun 02/18/2007 View Sat 02/17/2007 View Fri 02/16/2007 View Thu 02/15/2007 View Wed 02/14/2007 View Tue 02/13/2007
1
2007-02-19 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran’s Doctrine of Asymmetric Naval Warfare
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by anonymous5089 2007-02-19 12:23|| || Front Page|| [10 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Iran has developed innovative, asymmetric naval warfare tactics that exploit its favorable geographic situation, build on its strengths, and target the vulnerabilities of its enemies.

Exploit geography, play to your strengths and attack your enemies vulnerabilites. Dang! Now why didn't we think of that?
Posted by SteveS 2007-02-19 13:27||   2007-02-19 13:27|| Front Page Top

#2 How many hours does Iran have to get results from these tactics ? Our air superiority will wear down their forces and they will be forced to operate without cover. Will their tactics still have positive results even then ?
Bring them on, Puleeze.
Posted by wxjames 2007-02-19 15:23||   2007-02-19 15:23|| Front Page Top

#3 Shipman would love this article. He gets upset when he sees the mention of hundreds of small, swarming things.
Posted by Anonymoose 2007-02-19 15:34||   2007-02-19 15:34|| Front Page Top

#4 :>

Naw, I usually just sneer at 'em. Small swarming semi-intelligent things remind me of arabs.
Posted by Shipman 2007-02-19 16:50||   2007-02-19 16:50|| Front Page Top

#5 Right now, "asymmetric{al}" is the new kewl buzzword, and all the writers are using it. Does not mean that the concept actually will work, or stands a snowball's chance in Hell against a carrier battle group, it is the new kewl buzzword which must be invoked. Against Coast Guard high endurance cutters, Navy whalers, Marine Super Cobras, Burke class destroyers, F/A-18s, SeaHawks carrying Penguin missiles, and the like, all of the Iranian "asymetric naval warfare" craft will be quite useless after the first 15 minutes or so. They could possible actually sink one of our ships, but for the cost of their entire navy.
Posted by Shieldwolf 2007-02-19 18:21||   2007-02-19 18:21|| Front Page Top

#6 Oh, and by the way, a full scale swarm attack on the US Navy would give President Bush carte blanche to hammer Iran's nuclear program as retaliation.
Posted by Shieldwolf 2007-02-19 18:22||   2007-02-19 18:22|| Front Page Top

#7 There is no obvious prepping for invasion and occupation of Iran. Therefore: any play would involve destruction of Ayatollah power sources, psychological war against the Arabist parasites, and proferred alliances with seculars and religious moderates. I would forsee a quick coup after surgical strikes. Once the Khomeini Monument falls in Teheran, it is all over for the "parasts" (Iranian exile term for the ruling moonhowlers).

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the worst threat faced by the US and its allies is: Shiite power. Disregard the suicidal notions of the Wall Street Journal editorialists - and others - who favor exporting Iraq Shiite power to Iran. That cannot work.
Posted by Sneaze 2007-02-19 20:34||   2007-02-19 20:34|| Front Page Top

#8 the mullahs in Iran, are first and foremost gangsters posing as religious men. They have sources of income, assets (car dealerships, warehouses, etc) , and interests. It would be an integral part of a successful Iran campaign to take those assets and interests out with the first strike, along with their mansions and compounds. Strike at their power and the MM's will topple. Shut off the gasoline imports and the IRG will be pushing the targets vehicles towards the "front". No invasion necessary
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-02-19 21:08||   2007-02-19 21:08|| Front Page Top

#9 This naval doctrine sounds a lot like the old confederate horse general who said that his strategy was "to get there the firstest with the mostest". Isn't that our strategy too?
Posted by whatadeal 2007-02-19 22:47||   2007-02-19 22:47|| Front Page Top

11:14 ARMYGUY
23:56 mac
23:52 3dc
23:46 RD
23:31 Atomic Conspiracy
23:30 anonymous2u
23:23 3dc
23:20 Eric Jablow
23:18 RD
23:18 C-Low
23:16 RD
23:15 C-Low
23:12 RD
23:09 Frank G
23:09 RD
23:06 Barbara Skolaut
23:06 Frank G
22:59 gromgoru
22:57 phil_b
22:57 mhw
22:54 Frank G
22:51 MoeDee
22:47 whatadeal
22:44 Barbara Skolaut









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com