Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 02/20/2010 View Fri 02/19/2010 View Thu 02/18/2010 View Wed 02/17/2010 View Tue 02/16/2010 View Mon 02/15/2010 View Sun 02/14/2010
1
2010-02-20 Economy
Citigroup Warns Customers It May Refuse To Allow Withdrawals
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by  Anonymoose 2010-02-20 11:47|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 "Effective April 1, 2010, we reserve the right to require (7) days advance notice before permitting a withdrawal from all checking accounts. While we do not currently exercise this right and have not exercised it in the past, we are required by law to notify you of this change," Citigroup said on statements received by customers all over the country.

Nice move. Expect a major drawdown/cancellation of accounts in 5...4...3..
Posted by Frank G 2010-02-20 12:24||   2010-02-20 12:24|| Front Page Top

#2 Looks like the Marketing Department of my former and now-deceased IT employer has now found work....!
Posted by Uncle Phester 2010-02-20 13:21||   2010-02-20 13:21|| Front Page Top

#3 Somehow we all knew this was coming.

"No pulse, no hearbeat. If condition does not change, this man is dead."
Sidney Wang, Murder by Death (1976)
Posted by Besoeker 2010-02-20 13:40||   2010-02-20 13:40|| Front Page Top

#4 At least California gives IOU's.

I stopped doing business with Citibank, Travelers... when they got takenover by Obama and Company
Posted by airandee 2010-02-20 14:37||   2010-02-20 14:37|| Front Page Top

#5 I am starting to think my mattress is safer for my money than banks are.
Posted by DarthVader 2010-02-20 16:28||   2010-02-20 16:28|| Front Page Top

#6 Per the article this actually only in effect in Texas but mistakenly sent out to all States. BUT if Citi is in trouble in Texas they are in trouble every where else.

Or is this one of those things in the fine print (microscope required) that no one reads and Texas made plain notification a requirement?
Posted by tipover 2010-02-20 16:40||   2010-02-20 16:40|| Front Page Top

#7  This is most likely much ado about nothing. See this 550 page+ PDF from the Federal Reserve. Flip to p. 37, using the Acrobat Reader page select window, there see Highlights of Regulations Q and D
that Affect Consumers
Seven-Day Notice Period
Banks must reserve the right to require at least
seven days’ notice of a customer’s intent to
withdraw funds from savings accounts, NOW
accounts, and ATS accounts. Banks have the
option of enforcing this notice requirement, and in practice it is rarely, if ever, enforced.

Only exception is on p. 35: Demand deposit accounts have the following
characteristics:
• No maturity period (or maturity period of less
than seven days)
• Payable on demand (or on less than seven days’ notice)
• May not be interest-bearing
• No limit on the number of withdrawals or
transfers an account holder may make
• No eligibility requirements
I've never had a Demand Deposit Account, and I doubt few people have. Most people want some kind of interest paid on money they keep in a bank.
I have read many stories online of people who tried to withdraw as little as $500 in cash at one of their banks & could not get it for several days. Many of these stories pre-date the current financial crisis.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2010-02-20 19:32||   2010-02-20 19:32|| Front Page Top

#8 Really tired of banks being in the RIP OFF biz.
Posted by 3dc 2010-02-20 20:46||   2010-02-20 20:46|| Front Page Top

#9 Hell, its been a zombie bank for what, a year now? Without another feasting on brains chaange! it was only a matter of time before stuff like this pops up...if this is all in context and correct. Many reporters know as much about banking as they do the military so be sure to look into it yourself if you think you are affected.

If the banks were forced into these situations by laws, then ya gotta mention being pissed at the gov. If the bank was making bad moves which threatened the bank then the gov regulators should have caught it and again must mention the gov.

There are a ton of bank choices out there..if ya still with a bailout bank imho ya askin for it; not suggesting what you should do with your money mind you, just be sure about what you are doing with your money...you wouldn't just drop your kids off with anyone so why do that with your money. Shop around, don't just choose a bank solely because it is on your way home from work.
Posted by swksvolFF 2010-02-20 21:09||   2010-02-20 21:09|| Front Page Top

23:59 Frank G
23:22 gorb
23:21 gorb
23:20 tu3031
23:04 lotp
22:58 crosspatch
22:56 crosspatch
22:41 Frank G
22:40 newc
22:39 tu3031
22:39 newc
22:21 BernardZ
22:19 BernardZ
22:15 swksvolFF
22:13 BernardZ
22:12 trailing wife
22:12 Ptah
22:08 trailing wife
22:08 tipover
21:39 Uncle Phester
21:38 Goober Crealet3411
21:35 lord garth
21:29 trailing wife
21:29 rjschwarz









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com