Article

2007-03-17 Home Front: WoT

Ban word 'terrorist' from U.S. trial, lawyer asks

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2007-03-17 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Holding him in solitary isn't outrageous.

ALL suspected and convicted terrorists should be held in solitary confinement. Especially so in light of how Islam is spreading like wildfire throughout America's prison populations. Islamists represent one of the single most dangerous breeds of psychopath in history.

How it is possible for the defense to seek curbs upon free speech in a court of law stands as conduct worthy of censure. It is as if they seek to ban the word "steal" at a thief's trial. Padilla has already been charged with unrelated terrorist activity and the fact that a pattern of conduct is emerging more than justifies describing him as a terrorist. Jeanne Baker must have apprenticed under Lynne Stewart.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-03-17 00:29|| 2007-03-17 00:29|| Front Page Top

#2 Ditto.

Nice to see you posting again Zen.

Posted by Intrinsicpilot 2007-03-17 01:14|| 2007-03-17 01:14|| Front Page Top

#3 Just an excitable boy...

Posted by mojo 2007-03-17 01:17|| 2007-03-17 01:17|| Front Page Top

#4 Its not what they call Padilla, its the facts. If the jury begins to say, "That kinda stuff ain't gonna happen in my neighborhood," or, "I don't want that happening around here" then bad boy Padilla is going down. Show'em the facts,and the jurors' bullsh*t detectors will allow them to smell it out.

Posted by whatadeal 2007-03-17 01:22|| 2007-03-17 01:22|| Front Page Top

#5 That's as may be, whatadeal, but this issue is far more important than the actual outcome of this single trial. Under no circumstances should it be permissible to "sanitize" the prosecuting bench's accusatory language in such a crippling fashion. This is Politically Correct Newspeak and it must be slapped down, and slapped down HARD, for the legal balderdash it is.

PS: Back atcha' Ip.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-03-17 01:29|| 2007-03-17 01:29|| Front Page Top

#6 OK, how about "morally challenged"?

Posted by gorb 2007-03-17 06:48|| 2007-03-17 06:48|| Front Page Top

#7 Why don't we just ban the word criminal or crime or justice.

Posted by Jesing Ebbease3087 2007-03-17 15:49|| 2007-03-17 15:49|| Front Page Top

11:56 somesaypon
23:58 Sherry
23:48 Zenster
23:28 Anonymoose
23:25 Frank G
23:25 Frank G
23:15 49 Pan
23:03 Steve White
22:50 Dave D.
22:38 RD
22:38 Eric Jablow
22:30 Danking70
22:23 Sneaze
22:18 Shipman
22:16 Shipman
22:16 gromgoru
22:15 Sneaze
22:13 Lanny Ddub
22:11 twobyfour
22:09 Shipman
22:07 Chuck Simmins
22:04 twobyfour
22:03 Chuck Simmins
21:59 Shipman