Article

2006-06-11 Syria-Lebanon-Iran

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by ryuge 2006-06-11 01:14|| || Front Page|| [11132 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I agree; there should be nukes used on all muzzy states. Let's start with Iran.

Posted by mac 2006-06-11 02:07|| 2006-06-11 02:07|| Front Page Top

#2 Please use non-residue H bomb, as I live in the neighborhood.

Posted by gromgoru 2006-06-11 08:35|| 2006-06-11 08:35|| Front Page Top

#3 Curse Iran and that God Damned Islamic state.

Posted by newc">newc 2006-06-11 09:55|| 2006-06-11 09:55|| Front Page Top

#4 If we don't make an example out of Iran, you can bet your ass every Mulsim country will have nukes.

Posted by bigjim-ky 2006-06-11 12:37|| 2006-06-11 12:37|| Front Page Top

#5 They will all have nukes, and being the geniuses they are, one or more will feel brave enough to use one. Just wish they would target Brussels or Paris instead of Tel Aviv. We'll probably have to witness an outrage of this proportion until we will feel guiltless to annihilate the entire area and be done with this scum once and for all.

Posted by SOP35/Rat 2006-06-11 13:22|| 2006-06-11 13:22|| Front Page Top

#6 Who shall stop them, and when?

Or will the question be, in a few years: why did nobody stop them, so we lost our major cities?

Have you read Dan Simmons' letter?

Posted by Kalle (kafir forever) 2006-06-11 14:38|| http://radio.weblogs.com/0103811/categories/currentEvents/]">[http://radio.weblogs.com/0103811/categories/currentEvents/] 2006-06-11 14:38|| Front Page Top

#7 Neutron bombs would be fine. Eliminate the population and leave everything else intact.

Posted by Random Thoughts 2006-06-11 20:15|| 2006-06-11 20:15|| Front Page Top

#8 Man, this'll make for some big ass work accidents...

Posted by tu3031 2006-06-11 21:14|| 2006-06-11 21:14|| Front Page Top

#9 No, Moud-Mullahs want IRAN-ONLY to have nuclear weapons, NOT all other Muslim nations. Larijani is just being PC as Iran knows Dubya is NOT going to give them the many chances Saint Bill and the UNO gave Saddam, not after 9-11. IRAN'S DEADLINE IS CIRCA JUNE 27th, 2006. Failure to accept limits or Sanctions = referral to the UNSC for military action, which Dubya & Co. has already made clear the USA is prepared to act unilaterally. Not to argue that Dubya will attack on or shortly after June 27th, but it must be said that Dubya > generally a THREE STRIKES AND YOU'RE OUT kind of Leader-Moralist, i.e. once the chances for mutual peace-resolution are used up, its over and t'aint gonna be offered again.

Posted by Fleager Spinenter4931 2006-06-11 21:42|| 2006-06-11 21:42|| Front Page Top

#10 JosephM, I think you've misplaced your cookie, dear.

Why do you posit a June 27th deadline? (Not that I'm arguing, I'd much prefer sooner rather than later -- I'd just like to understand your thought on it.) Thanks in advance for explaining!

Posted by trailing wife 2006-06-11 22:57|| 2006-06-11 22:57|| Front Page Top

23:58 flyover
23:58 bigjim-ky
23:56 bigjim-ky
23:37 JosephMendiola
23:31 trailing wife
23:29 JosephMendiola
23:26 trailing wife
23:22 Glains Threrese9277
23:22 JosephMendiola
23:19 trailing wife
23:13 Lone Ranger
23:11 JosephMendiola
23:02 JosephMendiola
23:02 trailing wife
23:00 49 Pan
22:59 Frank G
22:57 trailing wife
22:57 JosephMendiola
22:49 Frank G
22:46 trailing wife
22:43 trailing wife
22:43 DMFD
22:37 Sherry
22:36 Captain America